Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Acta Psychologica

• Publication date

  2013-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.005PMID 24076331
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

  2012cited by this paper
• The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time.

  2012cited by this paper
• The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex

  2012cited by this paper
• Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle.

  2011cited by this paper
• Reaction time effects due to imperative stimulus modality are absent when a startle elicits a pre-programmed action.

  2011cited by this paper
• Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans.

  2011cited by this paper
• Gestalt principles in the control of motor action.

  2011cited by this paper
• Motor preparation of spatially and temporally defined movements: evidence from startle.

  2011cited by this paper
• The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?

  2009cited by this paper
• On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.

  2009cited by this paper
• How strategic is the central bottleneck: can it be overcome by trying harder?

  2009cited by this paper
• Current status of the motor program: revisited.

  2009cited by this paper
• Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement

  2009cited by this paper
• Motor limitation in dual-task processing with different effectors

  2008cited by this paper
• Bimanual Response Grouping in Dual-Task Paradigms

  2008cited by this paper
• Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans

  2008cited by this paper
• Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment

  2008cited by this paper
• Motor Limitation in Dual-Task Processing Under Ballistic Movement Conditions

  2006cited by this paper
• The startle reflex, voluntary movement, and the reticulospinal tract.

  2006cited by this paper
• Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects

  2006cited by this paper
• How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

  2006cited by this paper
• Excitability of subcortical motor circuits in Go/noGo and forced choice reaction time tasks.

  2006cited by this paper
• Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition

  2005cited by this paper
• Prepared Movements Are Elicited Early by Startle

  2004cited by this paper
• Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

  2004cited by this paper
• Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?

  2003cited by this paper
• Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

  2003cited by this paper
• A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

  2003cited by this paper
• Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion.

  2002cited by this paper
• Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection

  2002cited by this paper
• Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans

  1999cited by this paper
• The Psychology of Attention

  1997cited by this paper
• Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation

  1996cited by this paper
• The acoustic startle reflex: neurons and connections.

  1995cited by this paper
• Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects.

  1995cited by this paper
• Current status of the motor program.

  1994cited by this paper
• Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

  1994cited by this paper
• Cortical cell assemblies: a possible mechanism for motor programs.

  1994cited by this paper
• Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance

  1993cited by this paper
• Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance.

  1993cited by this paper
• New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man.

  1991cited by this paper
• The locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time.

  1984cited by this paper
• A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention

  1977cited by this paper
• Presidential Address, 1974. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation.

  1975cited by this paper
• Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

  1973cited by this paper
• Attention and Effort

  1973cited by this paper
• Attention and human performance

  1973cited by this paper
• On the speed of mental processes.

  1969cited by this paper
• The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period

  1969cited by this paper
• Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period

  1968cited by this paper
• The psychological refractory period

  1966cited by this paper
• THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY

  1952cited by this paper
• The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses

  1931cited by this paper
• (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.1378 Task Prioritisation in Multitasking during Driving: Opportunity to Abort a Concurrent Task Does Not Insulate Braking Responses from Dual-Task Slowing

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Upper-limb coordination deficits in paraplegia during symmetrical movement tasks: Evidence from surface EMG and kinematic analysis.

  2025cites this paper
• Media Multitasking – Does what they say Match the Reality? a Study of its Impact on Academic Performance

  2024cites this paper
• Working memory involvement in action planning does not include timing initiation structure

  2024cites this paper
• Effect of multitasking and task characteristics interaction on cognitive load and learning outcomes in virtual reality learning environments

  2023cites this paper
• Response preparation of a secondary reaction time task is influenced by movement phase within a continuous visuomotor tracking task

  2022cites this paper
• Retrospective composite analysis of StartReact data indicates sex differences in simple reaction time are not attributable to response preparation.

  2022cites this paper
• What Cognitive Mechanism, When, Where, and Why? Exploring the Decision Making of University and Professional Rugby Union Players During Competitive Matches

  2021cites this paper
• Investigating Attentional Demands of a Continuous Motor Task Using Probe Reaction Time and Measures of Corticospinal Excitability

  2020influential citation
• Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift–diffusion model approach

  2020cites this paper
• The role of duration in speech plans uncovered by startling auditory stimulus

  2020cites this paper
• Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms

  2019cites this paper
• Cognitive Performance in the relation between Digital Use and Subjective Wellbeing

  2019influential citation
• The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection

  2018cites this paper
• Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance

  2018cites this paper
• Refractory Period ( PRP ) and Emotions : Final dissertation

  2017cites this paper
• Separating Limits on Preparation Versus Online Processing in Multitasking Paradigms: Evidence for Resource Models

  2017cites this paper
• Examining interference of different cognitive tasks on voluntary balance control in aging and stroke

  2016cites this paper
• The Impact of Distraction on Laparoscopic Skills in Veterinary Medical Students.

  2016cites this paper
• Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation

  2015cites this paper
• A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.

  2015cites this paper
• Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle

  2015cites this paper
• Effect of dual tasking on intentional vs. reactive balance control in people with hemiparetic stroke.

  2014cites this paper
• When unintended movements "leak" out: a startling acoustic stimulus can elicit a prepared response during motor imagery and action observation.

  2013cites this paper
• Human Perception and Performance Separating Limits on Preparation Versus Online Processing in Multitasking Paradigms: Evidence for Resource Models

  year unknowncites this paper