Survey of otorhinolaryngologists on their clinical examinations performed in patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

• Publication date

  2016-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00405-015-3748-9PMID 26298704
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• European position paper on drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE)

  2014cited by this paper
• Diagnostic Value of the Friedman Tongue Position and Mallampati Classification for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

  2013influential reference
• Sleep endoscopy with simulation bite for prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome

  2013cited by this paper
• Current opinions and clinical practice in the titration of oral appliances in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing.

  2012cited by this paper
• The Upper Airway Evaluation of Habitual Snorers and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

  2012influential reference
• Oropharyngeal examination to predict sleep apnea severity.

  2011cited by this paper
• Nasal Obstruction and High Mallampati Score as Risk Factors for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

  2010influential reference
• The upper airway in sleep‐disordered breathing: A clinical prediction model

  2009cited by this paper
• Otorhinolaryngologic examination in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: the correlation between the severity of sleep disorder and physical examination.

  2009cited by this paper
• Airway evaluation in obstructive sleep apnea.

  2008cited by this paper
• Physical findings in the upper airways related to obstructive sleep apnea in men and women

  2007cited by this paper
• The prognostic value of simulated snoring in awake patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing: introduction of a new technique of examination.

  2006cited by this paper
• Comparison of two endoscopic examination methods, the Muller maneuver and fiberoptic pharyngoscopy during sleep, in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

  2006cited by this paper
• Sleep endoscopy versus modified Mallampati score in sleep apnea and snoring.

  2005cited by this paper
• Sleep Endoscopy Versus Modified Mallampati Score in Sleep Apnea and Snoring

  2005cited by this paper
• Head and Neck Physical Examination: Comparison Between Nonapneic and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

  2005cited by this paper
• Association of Systematic Head and Neck Physical Examination With Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea—Hypopnea Syndrome

  2003cited by this paper
• Clinical Staging for Sleep-Disordered Breathing

  2002cited by this paper
• Standard ENT clinical evaluation of the sleep-disordered breathing patient; a consensus report.

  2002cited by this paper
• [Predictive value of the Müller maneuver in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome].

  2000cited by this paper
• Physical findings and the risk for obstructive sleep apnea. The importance of oropharyngeal structures.

  2000cited by this paper
• The value of sedation nasendoscopy: a comparison between snoring and non-snoring patients.

  1998cited by this paper
• Observation of the mechanism of snoring using sleep nasendoscopy.

  1995cited by this paper
• Predictive value of Müller maneuver, cephalometry and clinical features for the outcome of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Evaluation of predictive factors using discriminant analysis in 30 sleep apnea patients.

  1994cited by this paper
• A grading system for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea--based on sleep nasendoscopy.

  1993cited by this paper
• Sleep nasendoscopy: a technique of assessment in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.

  1991cited by this paper
• A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.

  1986cited by this paper
• Predictive value of müuller maneuver in selection of patients for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

  1985cited by this paper

• Sleep medicine in otolaryngology units: an international survey

  2020cites this paper