Comparison of ranking results obtained by topsis and vikor methods, using the same criteria as times higher education world university ranking

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Economics, Education

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Academic Performance vs. Academic Reputation: What Comes First – How Well You Perform or How Others See Your Performance?

  2017cited by this paper
• ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity: What if the award factor was Excluded?

  2016cited by this paper
• Webometrics Ranking in the Context of Accessibility of Higher Education

  2016cited by this paper
• The effect of university mergers on the Shanghai ranking

  2015cited by this paper
• On the effects of institutional size in university classifications: the case of the Shanghai ranking

  2015cited by this paper
• What the Overall doesn’t tell about world university rankings: examples from ARWU, QSWUR, and THEWUR in 2013

  2015cited by this paper
• Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings

  2012cited by this paper
• Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications

  2011cited by this paper
• Policy-relevant Webometrics for individual scientific fields

  2010cited by this paper
• University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators

  2010cited by this paper
• “1986-2006 Türkiye Ekonomisinin Performans Değerlendirmesi”

  2008cited by this paper
• The Real and Perceived Influence of the US News Ranking

  2008cited by this paper
• Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods

  2007influential reference
• Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment

  2006cited by this paper
• Dynamic multiple responses by ideal solution analysis

  2004cited by this paper
• Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

  2004influential reference
• Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model

  2003cited by this paper
• USING MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR SUPPORTING DECISIONS OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

  2002cited by this paper
• Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study

  2000cited by this paper
• TOPSIS for MODM

  1994cited by this paper
• A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions

  1987cited by this paper
• A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems

  1973cited by this paper

• Analysis of Composting Methods for Sustainable Management of Biodegradable Waste Using Decision‐Making Techniques

  2025cites this paper
• Geospatial modeling and analysis of groundwater stress-prone areas using GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in Murshidabad district, India

  2023cites this paper
• A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India

  2022cites this paper
• A mathematical approach to medical diagnosis via Pythagorean fuzzy soft TOPSIS, VIKOR and generalized aggregation operators

  2021cites this paper
• Forest fire susceptibility mapping via multi-criteria decision analysis techniques for Mugla, Turkey: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

  2021cites this paper
• Using PLS Path Modelling in Education System: A Model to Measure the Academic Performance Score

  2021cites this paper
• A mathematical approach to medical diagnosis via Pythagorean fuzzy soft TOPSIS, VIKOR and generalized aggregation operators

  2021cites this paper
• Impact of Accreditation on Quality and Excellence of Higher Education Institutions

  2020cites this paper
• A good career start can open doors: the plusses and minuses of an international graduate student program—a student’s perspective

  2020cites this paper
• COMPARISON OF TOPSIS AND VIKOR MULTI CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

  2018cites this paper
• El impacto de las políticas de evaluación del profesorado en la posición en los ránquines universitarios: el caso de la Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña

  2016cites this paper