Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Eye

• Publication date

  2011-09-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/eye.2011.151PMID 21720417PMCID PMC3178233
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Pre-operative quality of life and psychological factors that influence patient decision making in LASIK

  2010cited by this paper
• Referrals to the Wills Eye Institute Cornea Service after laser in situ keratomileusis: Reasons for patient dissatisfaction

  2008cited by this paper
• Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis.

  2007cited by this paper
• The Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire: development and validation.

  2006cited by this paper
• The Development and Validation of the Health Proneness Questionnaire

  2006cited by this paper
• A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers.

  2005cited by this paper
• 5-year follow-up of LASIK for hyperopia.

  2005cited by this paper
• Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes

  2005cited by this paper
• Patient Satisfaction and Visual Symptoms After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis

  2004cited by this paper
• The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: Development and Validation

  2004cited by this paper
• Personality and quality of life: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment

  2004cited by this paper
• Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Quality-of-Life Scale for Myopia

  2004cited by this paper
• The case for domains of function in quality of life assessment

  2004cited by this paper
• Reasons patients recommend laser in situ keratomileusis

  2004cited by this paper
• Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups.

  2003cited by this paper
• A Guide to Health Measurement

  2003cited by this paper
• Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments.

  2003cited by this paper
• Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis.

  2003cited by this paper
• An informal satisfaction survey of 200 patients after laser in situ keratomileusis.

  2002cited by this paper
• Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia up to -11 diopters with up to -5 diopters of astigmatism with the summit autonomous LADARVision excimer laser system.

  2001cited by this paper
• Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia.

  2001cited by this paper
• Laser in situ keratomileusis with a scanning excimer laser for the correction of low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism

  2001cited by this paper
• Cognitive dissonance, the placebo effect and the evaluation of surgical results.

  2000cited by this paper
• Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 1: development and validation of a survey questionnaire.

  2000cited by this paper
• Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients.

  2000cited by this paper
• Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges

  2000cited by this paper
• The refractive status and vision profile: a questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error.

  2000cited by this paper
• Attitude change: persuasion and social influence.

  2000cited by this paper
• Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia

  2000cited by this paper
• Laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

  1998cited by this paper
• What are quality of life measurements measuring?

  1998cited by this paper
• Issues in quality-of-life measurement in clinical trials.

  1991cited by this paper
• Factors of importance when evaluating quality of life in clinical trials.

  1990cited by this paper
• Laser in situ keratomileusis

  1990cited by this paper

• Association of Big Five Inventory Personality Traits With Postoperative Satisfaction and Visual Quality Following Corneal Refractive Surgery.

  2026cites this paper
• Patient-Reported LASIK Outcomes on RealSelf: a Social Media Review Platform

  2025cites this paper
• Changes in quality of life after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

  2025cites this paper
• A comprehensive study of laser use in dermatology: assessing the safety, innovations, and effectiveness of laser technology for skin treatment

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of Refractive Surgery on Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: A Six-Month Assessment in Palestine

  2025cites this paper
• Patient-Reported Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

  2024cites this paper
• Advancements in Laser Eye Surgery Through Sectional Study

  2024cites this paper
• Corneal Refractive Surgery Considerations in Patients with Anorexia Nervosa

  2024cites this paper
• The promising role of chatbots in keratorefractive surgery patient education.

  2024cites this paper
• Risks and Benefits of LASIK Surgery

  2023cites this paper
• Actualización sobre las contraindicaciones en cirugía refractiva láser corneal

  2022cites this paper
• Chirurgie réfractive : Partie 2. Complications et progrès récents

  2022cites this paper
• Chirurgie réfractive : Partie 1. Résultats à long terme

  2022influential citation
• Update on contraindications in laser corneal refractive surgery.

  2022cites this paper
• Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Marfan Syndrome—Polish Study

  2022cites this paper
• Periorbital aesthetic concerns in patients seeking corneal refractive surgery

  2021cites this paper
• Reversal of Myopic Correction for Patients Intolerant to LASIK

  2021cites this paper
• Commentary: Pre-aesthetic workup: Should it be a part of pre-refractive surgery workup?

  2021cites this paper
• Re-treatment in LASIK: To Flap Lift or Perform Surface Ablation.

  2020cites this paper
• Subjective Happiness and Satisfaction in Postoperative Anisometropic Patients after Refractive Surgery for Myopia

  2020cites this paper
• Subjective Happiness and Sleep in University Students with High Myopia

  2020cites this paper
• Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Review

  2019cites this paper
• Visual Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following LASIK on Eyes with Low Myopia and Astigmatism

  2018cites this paper
• Functional outcome and patient satisfaction following LASIK surgery

  2018cites this paper
• Patients’ satisfaction and subjective happiness after refractive surgery for myopia

  2018cites this paper
• Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery Preferred Practice Pattern®.

  2018cites this paper
• Assessment and Evaluation of the Level of Satisfaction After Lasik Among Myopic Patients in Aljouf City

  2017influential citation
• A Survey of Patient Satisfaction with LASIK

  2017cites this paper
• Questionnaires for Measuring Refractive Surgery Outcomes.

  2017cites this paper
• Changes in Corneal Higher Order Aberrations (HOAS) and its Effect on Quality of Life after Wavefront Optimized Lasik

  2017cites this paper
• Symptoms and Satisfaction of Patients in the Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL) Studies

  2017cites this paper
• Patient-reported Outcomes for Assessment of Quality of Life in Refractive Error: A Systematic Review.

  2017cites this paper
• Satisfaction with life in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS): associations with health-related consequences of MFS, pain, fatigue, and demographic factors

  2016cites this paper
• An advanced extended depth of focus IOL for new-age cataract patients

  2016cites this paper
• Anterior Chamber Foldable Phakic Intra Ocular Lens Safety and Efficacy

  2016cites this paper
• Patient profile and postoperative follow up compliance in refractive surgery

  2016cites this paper
• Works Title Symptoms and Satisfaction of Patients in the Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis ( PROWL ) Studies Permalink

  2016cites this paper
• Percepce subjektivního dopadu zdravotního postižení / přítomnosti chronického onemocnění a pojetí zdravotního uvědomění a gramotnosti - výzkumy, teorie a jejich využití v práci s klientem

  2016cites this paper
• Managing Expectations in Refractive Surgery

  2016cites this paper
• Functional Outcome and Patient Satisfaction after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

  2015cites this paper
• Simultaneous Dynamic Optical Refraction and Biometry of the Human Accommodative Response

  2015cites this paper
• Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2012: a review

  2014cites this paper
• LASIK

  2013cites this paper
• Secretary for Quality of Care

  2012cites this paper
• Clinical Ophthalmology Dovepress Effects of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis on Mental Health-related Quality of Life

  year unknowncites this paper
• Refractive Surgery Part 2: Complications and Recent Advances

  year unknowncites this paper
• Refractive Surgery Part 1: Long-term Outcomes

  year unknowninfluential citation