The mounting evidence that R genes incur large fitness costs raises a question: how can there be a 5–10% fitness reduction for all 149 R genes in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome? The R genes tested to date segregate for insertion–deletion (indel) polymorphisms where susceptible alleles are complete deletions. Since costs of resistance are measured as the differential fitness of isolines carrying resistant and susceptible alleles, indels reveal costs that may be masked when susceptible alleles are expressed. Rps2 segregates for two expressed clades of alleles, one resistant and one susceptible. Plants with resistant Rps2 are not less fit than those with a susceptible Rps2 allele in the absence of disease. Instead, all alleles provide a fitness benefit relative to an artificial deletion because of the role of RPS2 as a negative regulator of defence. Our results highlight the interplay between genomic architecture and the magnitude of costs of resistance.
Genetic architecture and pleiotropy shape costs of Rps2-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana
Alice H. MacQueen,Xiaoqin Sun,J. Bergelson
Published 2016 in Nature Plants
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2016
- Venue
Nature Plants
- Publication date
2016-07-15
- Fields of study
Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-38 of 38 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-40 of 40 citing papers · Page 1 of 1