Impact of defibrillation testing on predicted ICD shock efficacy: implications for clinical practice.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Heart Rhythm

• Publication date

  2013-05-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.028PMID 23369742
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of Fixed Tilt and Tuned Defibrillation Waveforms: The PROMISE Study

  2013cited by this paper
• Impact of Defibrillation Test Protocol and Test Repetition on the Probability of Meeting Implant Criteria

  2011cited by this paper
• Incidence of very high defibrillation thresholds (DFT) and efficacy of subcutaneous (SQ) array insertion during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation

  2010cited by this paper
• Estimating the Parameter Distributions of Defibrillation Shock Efficacy Curves in a Large Population

  2010cited by this paper
• No benefit from defibrillation threshold testing in the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial).

  2008cited by this paper
• The Dilemma of ICD Implant Testing

  2007cited by this paper
• Benefit of millisecond waveform durations for patients with high defibrillation thresholds.

  2006cited by this paper
• Defibrillation threshold testing: is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion?

  2005cited by this paper
• Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it.

  2004cited by this paper
• Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial of Empirical Antitachycardia Pacing Versus Shocks for Spontaneous Rapid Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) Trial Results

  2004cited by this paper
• Safety of a Single Successful Conversion of Ventricular Fibrillation Before the Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillators

  2003cited by this paper
• Efficacy and Temporal Stability of Reduced Safety Margins for Ventricular Defibrillation: Primary Results From the Low Energy Safety Study (LESS)

  2002cited by this paper
• Effect of Shock Polarity on Biphasic Defibrillation Thresholds Using an Active Pectoral Lead System

  1998cited by this paper
• Comparative Reproducibility of Defibrillation Threshold and Upper Limit of Vulnerability

  1996cited by this paper
• A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

  1989cited by this paper
• Relation of the intraoperative defibrillation threshold to successful postoperative defibrillation with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

  1988cited by this paper
• The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.

  1987cited by this paper

• Influence of “high” defibrillation thresholds on patient survival and impact of system modification

  2021cites this paper
• Regression Models

  2019cites this paper
• Shock efficacy of single and dual coil electrodes—new insights from the NORDIC ICD Trial

  2018cites this paper
• 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

  2016cites this paper
• 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing

  2016cites this paper
• 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

  2016cites this paper
• The NO Regular Defibrillation testing In Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation (NORDIC ICD) trial: concept and design of a randomized, controlled trial of intra-operative defibrillation testing during de novo defibrillator implantation.

  2015cites this paper
• sensus Statement on Optimal Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Programming and Testing

  2015cites this paper
• Intra-operative defibrillation testing and clinical shock efficacy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the NORDIC ICD randomized clinical trial

  2015cites this paper
• Assessment of Adequate Safety Margin Using Single Coupling Interval‐Upper Limit of Vulnerability Test

  2014cites this paper
• The NO Regular Defibrillation testing In Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation (NORDIC ICD) trial: concept and design of a randomized, controlled trial of intra-operative defibrillation testing during de novo defibrillator implantation

  2014cites this paper
• Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Clinical Aspects

  2013cites this paper
• Defibrillation testing unplugged.

  2013cites this paper
• Clinical Impact, Safety, and Efficacy of Single‐ versus Dual‐Coil ICD Leads in MADIT‐CRT

  2013cites this paper
• Troubleshooting

  2012cites this paper