Lifestyle characteristics among participants in a Norwegian colorectal cancer screening trial

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2006

• Venue

  European Journal of Cancer Prevention

• Publication date

  2006-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/01.CEJ.0000186636.27496.BBPMID 16374224
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• [Nordic nutrition recommendations].

  2006cited by this paper
• Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer

  2004cited by this paper
• Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

  2004cited by this paper
• CRC screening: review of the evidence and suggestions on when and how to move on from randomized trials to screening programmes

  2004cited by this paper
• Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in a population-based study: the impact of gender, health care source, and time.

  2004influential reference
• Diet and cancer — the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

  2004cited by this paper
• The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey

  2004cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

  2003cited by this paper
• Diet, Body Weight, and Colorectal Cancer: A Summary of the Epidemiologic Evidence

  2003cited by this paper
• Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults.

  2003cited by this paper
• [Primary and secondary prevention of colorectal cancer].

  2003cited by this paper
• Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States

  2003influential reference
• [Screening colonoscopy among persons 50 to 60 years of age with and without familial risk of colorectal cancer - a prospective multicenter trial].

  2003cited by this paper
• The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years.

  2003cited by this paper
• Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.

  2003cited by this paper
• Primary and Secondary Prevention in Colorectal Cancer

  2003cited by this paper
• AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance : Clinical Guidelines and Rationale — Update Based on New Evidence

  2003cited by this paper
• European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003).

  2003cited by this paper
• Screeningkoloskopie bei Personen zwischen 50 und 60 Jahren mit und ohne familiäres Risiko für Kolonkarzinom - eine prospektive Multizenterstudie

  2003cited by this paper
• Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps

  2002cited by this paper
• Adherence to repeat screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial

  2002influential reference
• Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

  2002cited by this paper
• Barriers to preventive intervention.

  2002influential reference
• Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening

  2002cited by this paper
• Design, Organization and Management of a Controlled Population Screening Study for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia: Attendance Rates in the NORCCAP Study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention)

  2002cited by this paper
• Diversity of dietary patterns observed in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) project

  2002influential reference
• Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors.

  2001influential reference
• Physical activity and cancer risk: dose-response and cancer, all sites and site-specific.

  2001cited by this paper
• Do undesirable effects of screening affect all‐cause mortality in flexible sigmoidoscopy programmes? Experience from the Telemark Polyp Study 1983–1996

  2001cited by this paper
• An updated review of the epidemiological evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk of colorectal cancer.

  2001cited by this paper
• Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial

  2000influential reference
• A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women.

  2000cited by this paper
• Healthy dietary habits in relation to social determinants and lifestyle factors

  1999cited by this paper
• WHO consensus statement on the role of nutrition in colorectal cancer.

  1999cited by this paper
• Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I.

  1999cited by this paper
• Relationship between dietary habits, age, lifestyle, and socio-economic status among adult Norwegian women. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study

  1998cited by this paper
• Who eats 5 a day?: intake of fruits and vegetables among Norwegians in relation to gender and lifestyle.

  1998cited by this paper

• Predictors of Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Hospitalized Women

  2022cites this paper
• Development of Information Road map for Personalized Colorectal Cancer Screening in Iran

  2020cites this paper
• Concurrent participation in screening for cervical, breast, and bowel cancer in England

  2019cites this paper
• Rapid review of factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy screening use.

  2019cites this paper
• Title: Improving cancer preventive behaviors: a randomized trial of tailored lifestyle

  2018cites this paper
• Analysing mHealth usage logs in RCTs: Explaining participants’ interactions with type 2 diabetes self-management tools

  2018cites this paper
• Improving Cancer Preventive Behaviors: A Randomized Trial of Tailored Lifestyle Feedback in Colorectal Cancer Screening

  2018cites this paper
• The effect of colorectal cancer screening on health status in a survey study

  2018cites this paper
• Ethical issues with colorectal cancer screening—a systematic review

  2017cites this paper
• Lifestyle predictors for non-participation and outcome in the second round of faecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening

  2017cites this paper
• Respondent selection in a repeated survey on lifestyle within the randomized colorectal cancer screening programme

  2017cites this paper
• Lifestyle changes at middle age and mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study

  2016cites this paper
• Incentives and participation in a medical survey.

  2016influential citation
• Low post-operative mortality after surgery on patients with screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurysms: a Swedvasc registry study.

  2014cites this paper
• A Low-Intensity Mobile Health Intervention With and Without Health Counseling for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 1: Baseline and Short-Term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Norwegian Part of RENEWING HEALTH

  2014cites this paper
• Reasons for non‐participation in population‐based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening

  2014cites this paper
• Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial

  2014cites this paper
• Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

  2014cites this paper
• Do individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer adhere to medical recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer?

  2013cites this paper
• Principles, effectiveness and caveats in screening for cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Low-Intensity Self-Management Intervention for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Using a Mobile Phone-Based Diabetes Diary, With and Without Health Counseling and Motivational Interviewing: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

  2013cites this paper
• Screening colonoscopy participation in Turkish colorectal cancer patients and their first degree relatives.

  2012cites this paper
• The influence of non-response in a population-based cohort study on type 2 diabetes evaluated by the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register

  2012cites this paper
• Smoking, Smoking Cessation, and Lung Cancer Screening in the NELSON Trial

  2011cites this paper
• Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic review

  2011cites this paper
• Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?

  2010cites this paper
• Sex, Age, and Birth Cohort Effects in Colorectal Neoplasms

  2010cites this paper
• Adverse lifestyle effects of colorectal cancer screening : Does the incidence of selected lifestyle-related comorbidities change dependent upon a screening outcome?

  2010cites this paper
• Does participation to screening unintentionally influence lifestyle behaviour and thus lifestyle-related morbidity?

  2010cites this paper
• Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial

  2009cites this paper
• Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of the use of periodic health examinations: public vs. private sector.

  2009cites this paper
• Colorectal cancer in Europe and Australia: challenges and opportunities for the future

  2008cites this paper
• Comparison of nonbreast cancer incidence, survival and mortality between breast screening program participants and nonparticipants

  2008cites this paper
• Associations of job strain and working overtime with adverse health behaviors and obesity: evidence from the Whitehall II Study, Helsinki Health Study, and the Japanese Civil Servants Study.

  2008cites this paper
• A 9-Year Follow-up Study of Participants and Nonparticipants in Sigmoidoscopy Screening: Importance of Self-Selection

  2008cites this paper
• Impact of colorectal cancer screening on future lifestyle choices: a three-year randomized controlled trial.

  2007cites this paper
• Aspects of participation in sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

  2007cites this paper
• Factors determining early adherence to a lung cancer screening protocol

  2007cites this paper
• Toward understanding nonparticipation in sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

  2007cites this paper
• Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer.

  2007cites this paper
• Lifestyle as a predictor for colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals

  2006cites this paper
• GPX Pro198Leu and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphisms and risk of development of colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer.

  2005cites this paper