Meta‐analysis with missing study‐level sample variance data

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Statistics in Medicine

• Publication date

  2016-07-30

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/sim.6908PMID 26888093PMCID PMC4931964
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Missing data

  2019cited by this paper
• Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys

  2016cited by this paper
• Meta‐Analysis of Assay Sensitivity and Study Features in Clinical Trials of Pharmacologic Treatments for Osteoarthritis Pain

  2014cited by this paper
• Assay sensitivity and study features in neuropathic pain trials

  2013cited by this paper
• Multiple Imputation and its Application

  2013cited by this paper
• Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.

  2011cited by this paper
• A note on dealing with missing standard errors in meta‐analyses of continuous outcome measures in WinBUGS

  2011cited by this paper
• The Effects of Imputing the Missing Standard Deviations on the Standard Error of Meta Analysis Estimates

  2009cited by this paper
• Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis

  2008cited by this paper
• A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data.

  2006influential reference
• Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.

  2006cited by this paper
• Beyond classical meta-analysis: can inadequately reported studies be included?

  2004cited by this paper
• Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents.

  2004cited by this paper
• Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models

  2003cited by this paper
• Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents.

  2003cited by this paper
• Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.

  2002cited by this paper
• Generalized Linear Models

  2002cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis combining parallel and cross‐over clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes

  2002cited by this paper
• How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

  2002cited by this paper
• Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data

  2002cited by this paper
• Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data

  2000cited by this paper
• Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

  1997cited by this paper
• A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.

  1995cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

  1989influential reference
• Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature.

  1987cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

  1986cited by this paper

• Bayesian time-varying meta-analysis via hierarchical mean-variance random-effects models

  2025cites this paper
• MSE FINDR: A Shiny R Application to Estimate Mean Square Error Using Treatment Means and Post-hoc Test Results.

  2024cites this paper
• Choice of supraglottic airway devices: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

  2024cites this paper
• Heterogeneity Measure in Meta-analysis without Study-specific Variance Information

  2024cites this paper
• Comparative efficacy and safety of non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

  2023cites this paper
• Treatment of acute-onset hypertension in pregnancy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-hypertensives and route of administration.

  2023cites this paper
• Statistical inference on mixed one- and two-armed studies in meta-analysis without study-specific variance

  2022cites this paper
• Efficacy of regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing major oncologic breast surgeries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  2022cites this paper
• The Role of Agricultural Extension Programs On Crop Farming Technical Efficiency

  2021cites this paper
• Lychee Seed as a Potential Hypoglycemic Agent, and Exploration of its Underlying Mechanisms

  2021influential citation
• In Regard to Soltys et al.

  2021cites this paper
• Efficacy of regional blocks or local anaesthetic infiltration for analgesia after caesarean delivery: a network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials

  2021cites this paper
• A meta-analytical assessment of the aggregation parameter of the binary power law for characterizing spatial heterogeneity of plant disease incidence.

  2021cites this paper
• Carbetocin compared with oxytocin in non-elective Cesarean delivery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized-controlled trials

  2020cites this paper
• Meta-analyses in management: What can we learn from clinical research?

  2020cites this paper
• Multivariate network meta-analysis incorporating class effects

  2020cites this paper
• A simple test for the difference of means in meta-analysis when study-specific variances are unreported

  2020cites this paper
• Efficacy of New Long-Acting Bupivacaine HTX-011 in Providing Pain Relief for Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery – A Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

  2020cites this paper
• Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide

  2019cites this paper
• Meta-analysis in Sociological Research: Power and Heterogeneity

  2019cites this paper
• Vasopressor drugs for the prevention and treatment of hypotension during neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of fetal and maternal outcomes.

  2019cites this paper
• Meta-analysis without study-specific variance information: Heterogeneity case

  2019cites this paper
• Carbetocin reduces the need for additional uterotonics in elective caesarean delivery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

  2019cites this paper
• Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review

  2018cites this paper
• Handling missing continuous outcome data in a Bayesian network meta-analysis

  2018cites this paper
• Replacing qpcr non-detects with microarray expression data : An initialized approach towards microarray and qPCR data integration

  2018cites this paper
• Opioid-sparing effects of the thoracic interfascial plane blocks: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  2018cites this paper
• Haloperidol Versus 5‐HT3 Receptor Antagonists for Postoperative Vomiting and QTc Prolongation: A Noninferiority Meta‐Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2018cites this paper
• Statistical methodology for estimating the mean difference in a meta‐analysis without study‐specific variance information

  2017cites this paper
• Comparison of the Recovery Profile between Desflurane and Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery—a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2017cites this paper
• Role of Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Meta-analysis of Comparative Trials.

  2017cites this paper