Commentary: Fundamental problems with candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies - reflections on Moore and Thoemmes (2016).

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

• Publication date

  2017-03-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12669PMID 28194762PMCID PMC5312579
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• What is the biological reality of gene-environment interaction estimates? An assessment of bias in developmental models.

  2016influential reference
• Evaluating Historical Candidate Genes for Schizophrenia

  2015cited by this paper
• Problems and Pit-Falls in Testing for G × E and Epistasis in Candidate Gene Studies of Human Behavior

  2014cited by this paper
• Mind the gap: why many geneticists and psychological scientists have discrepant views about gene-environment interaction (G×E) research.

  2014cited by this paper
• Gene × environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution.

  2014cited by this paper
• A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry.

  2011cited by this paper
• GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.

  2011cited by this paper
• Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability.

  1990cited by this paper

• Genetic susceptibility to adverse arsenic-related cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review

  2025cites this paper
• The influence of testosterone on rejection sensitivity: Insights from salivary testosterone levels and genetic polymorphisms

  2024influential citation
• Testing Environmental Effects on Age at Menarche and Sexual Debut within a Genetically Informative Twin Design

  2023cites this paper
• OXTR polymorphisms and parental bonding modulate alexithymia: The main effects and interaction

  2023influential citation
• Identifying the Basic Dimensions of Medication-Triggered Impulsive Compulsive Behaviours in Parkinson’s Disease

  2023cites this paper
• Bereft and Left: The interplay between insecure attachment, isolation, and neurobiology

  2022cites this paper
• G2PMineR: A Genome to Phenome Literature Review Approach

  2021cites this paper
• Therapygenetic effects of 5-HTTLPR on cognitive-behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis.

  2021cites this paper
• Associations between oxytocin and empathy in humans: A systematic literature review.

  2021cites this paper
• Gene-Environment Interactions Relevant to Estrogen and Risk of Breast Cancer: Can Gene-Environment Interactions Be Detected Only among Candidate SNPs from Genome-Wide Association Studies?

  2021cites this paper
• Genome Wide Prediction, Mapping and Development of Genomic Resources of Mastitis Associated Genes in Water Buffalo

  2021cites this paper
• Context matters: Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with increased disordered eating and earlier activation of genetic influences in girls.

  2021cites this paper
• Gene-Environment Interactions in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Dimensions: The Role of Unhealthy Food Habits

  2021cites this paper
• IS THIS THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF BEHAVIORAL GENETICS?

  2021cites this paper
• The effect of polymorphisms in startle-related genes on anxiety symptom severity.

  2020cites this paper
• SNPs from BCHE and DRD3 genes associated to cocaine abuse amongst violent individuals from Sao Paulo, Brazil.

  2020cites this paper
• The immunity‐related GTPase M rs13361189 variant does not increase the risk for prevalent or incident steatosis; results from the Framingham Heart Study

  2019cites this paper
• Genomic updates in understanding PTSD.

  2019cites this paper
• No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples.

  2019cites this paper
• Father absence, age at menarche, and sexual behaviors in women: Evaluating the genetic confounding hypothesis using the androgen receptor gene.

  2019cites this paper
• Neuropeptide Y Gene × Environment Interaction Predicts Resilience and Positive Future Focus.

  2019cites this paper
• Molecular genetics in psychology and personality neuroscience: On candidate genes, genome wide scans, and new research strategies.

  2019cites this paper
• Child maltreatment, adaptive functioning, and polygenic risk: A structural equation mixture model

  2019cites this paper
• Genetic risk for neuroticism predicts emotional health depending on childhood adversity

  2018cites this paper
• Epigenetic correlates of neonatal contact in humans

  2017cites this paper
• Commentary: What is the case for candidate gene approaches in the era of high-throughput genomics? A response to Border and Keller (2017).

  2017influential citation