Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Nursing Ethics

• Publication date

  2011-06-06

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Philosophy, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/0969733011403807PMID 21646327
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The History of Sexuality: An Introduction

  2012cited by this paper
• ‘Caught in the act’: ethics committee review and researching the sexual culture of schools

  2009cited by this paper
• Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation

  2009cited by this paper
• Accounting for Ethos or Programmes for Conduct? The Brave New World of Research Ethics Committees

  2009cited by this paper
• A double-edged sword? Health research and research governance in UK primary care.

  2009cited by this paper
• The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence

  2009cited by this paper
• New Strategies of Control

  2008cited by this paper
• THE PRACTICE AND POLITICS OF FUNDED QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

  2007cited by this paper
• Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice.

  2007cited by this paper
• Questionable Requirement for Consent in Observational Research in Psychiatry

  2007cited by this paper
• Informed consent in a changing environment.

  2007cited by this paper
• Ethical issues in social inquiry : the enemy within?

  2007cited by this paper
• The Tensions Between Academic Freedom and Institutional Review Boards

  2007cited by this paper
• Rethinking Ethics Review as Institutional Discourse

  2007cited by this paper
• The Illinois White Paper

  2007cited by this paper
• Canadian University Ethics Review

  2007cited by this paper
• Participatory research

  2007cited by this paper
• The Epistemological Bias of Ethics Review

  2007cited by this paper
• Power, Ethics, and the IRB

  2007cited by this paper
• The Technologies of Normalization and Self

  2007cited by this paper
• Common (Mis)Perceptions About IRB Review of Human Subjects Research

  2005cited by this paper
• Dangerous Discourses: Methodological Conservatism and Governmental Regimes of Truth

  2004cited by this paper
• Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics

  2004cited by this paper
• Qualitative Research and Institutional Review Boards

  2004cited by this paper
• Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent.

  2003cited by this paper
• Nuremberg and Tuskegee: lessons for contemporary American medicine.

  2003cited by this paper
• International research ethics.

  2000cited by this paper
• Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.

  1997cited by this paper
• Putting Humpty Together Again: Essays toward Integrative Analysis@@@The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act@@@Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977

  1982cited by this paper
• Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977

  1980cited by this paper
• Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison

  1978cited by this paper
• Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason.

  1966cited by this paper

• The personal, academic and political dimensions of researching domestic violence: an autoethnographic exploration

  2026cites this paper
• Ethical challenges confronted in non-clinical, public health research with young people in England

  2025influential citation
• From Power Over to Power With: The PARTNER Tool for Transformation in Participatory Health Research.

  2025cites this paper
• ‘Consider a Less Risky Alternative’: Navigating Ethics Approval in Suicide Research

  2025influential citation
• Intersectional Performativity Framework: A Collective Reflexivity in Ethics on Ethnographic Research With Vulnerable Groups in China

  2025cites this paper
• Giving, Receiving, Reciprocating: The Reimagining of Ethics in Participatory Health Research

  2025influential citation
• Interrogating the concept of vulnerability in social research ethics

  2024cites this paper
• The Ethics of Using News Stories concerning Minors as Empirical Material in Health Research: Reflections on a Swedish Case.

  2024cites this paper
• Hard to reach? Methodological challenges researching vulnerable, gang‐involved, young people

  2024cites this paper
• Cooperation with Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Reflections of Co-Researchers Associated with Conducting Inclusive Research

  2024cites this paper
• Legal dissemination protections in community-based participatory health equity research

  2024cites this paper
• Reimagining institutional ethics procedures in research partnerships with young people across Majority/Minority World contexts

  2023cites this paper
• Vulnerable advantages: Re-searching my self while navigating queer identity, research ethics, and emotional labour

  2023cites this paper
• Promoting nurses' and midwives' ethical responsibilities towards vulnerable people: An alignment of research and clinical practice

  2022cites this paper
• Why do people participate in research interviews? Participant orientations and ethical contracts in interviews with victims of interpersonal violence

  2022cites this paper
• First do no harm: using ‘ethical triage’ to minimise causing harm when undertaking educational research among vulnerable participants

  2021cites this paper
• A combination sampling approach for epidemiologic research in humanitarian settings: a case analysis of a study of depressive disorder prevalence among refugees in Greece

  2021cites this paper
• From vision to action: Canadian leadership in ethics and neurotechnology.

  2021cites this paper
• Ethics review, reflective equilibrium and reflexivity

  2021cites this paper
• The ethics of facing the Other in suicide

  2021cites this paper
• Beyond Formal Ethics Reviews: Reframing the Potential Harms of Sexual Violence Research

  2021cites this paper
• The Relationship Between Ethics and Ontology in Researching Suicide

  2021cites this paper
• Ethical Data Collection and Recognizing the Impact of Semi-Structured Interviews on Research Respondents

  2020cites this paper
• The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study

  2020cites this paper
• Value, vulnerability and voice: An integrative review on research assent

  2020cites this paper
• Ethnic Data Collection: Key Elements, Rules and Principles

  2019cites this paper
• “On the Way to Calvary, I Lost My Way”: Navigating Ethical Quagmires in Community Psychology at the Margins

  2019cites this paper
• Ethical approval and informed consent reporting in ASEAN journals: a systematic review

  2019cites this paper
• Evaluation of the burdens and benefits of participation in research by parents of children with life-limiting illnesses.

  2019cites this paper
• Reporting of ethical considerations in clinical trials in Chinese nursing journals

  2019cites this paper
• Stakeholders' Explanations of the State of Cricket in Barbados

  2019cites this paper
• Vulnerable Vets? How Gatekeeping and Stereotypes Shape Access to Student-Veterans in the Qualitative Interview Process

  2019influential citation
• Ethnic Data Collection: Key Elements, Rules and Principles

  2019cites this paper
• Visibility at risk for women as rights-holders : a study with regard to a refugee camp context

  2019cites this paper
• An Evaluation of a Redesigned Developmental Mathematics Course at a Hawaii Community College

  2019cites this paper
• Ethnographic reflections on access to care services

  2019cites this paper
• Mental health, big data and research ethics: Parity of esteem in mental health research from a UK perspective

  2019cites this paper
• Traversing Ethical Imperatives: Learning from Stories from the Field

  2018cites this paper
• Doing Research with Vulnerable Populations: The Case of Intravenous Drug Users

  2018cites this paper
• Research ethics, informed consent and the disempowerment of First Nation peoples

  2018cites this paper
• 'Insiderness' in my pilot study research

  2018cites this paper
• What is ‘access’ in the context of qualitative research?

  2018cites this paper
• “Money Helps”: People who inject drugs and their perceptions of financial compensation and its ethical implications

  2018cites this paper
• Telephone street triage : a service user perspective

  2018cites this paper
• Ethics Are Admin: Australian Human Research Ethics Review Forms as (Un)Ethical Actors

  2018cites this paper
• Carer positioning in supporting someone living with cancer and dementia: a narrative approach

  2017cites this paper
• Virtuous Leadership for Increased Business Growth

  2017cites this paper
• Women and alcohol: a phenomenological exploration of women’s decisions to engage with drug and alcohol services

  2016cites this paper
• The successful implementation of electronic health records at small rural hospitals

  2016cites this paper
• Just a bunch of grapes? Liminality and the experiences of adult visitors to NHS acute medical and surgical wards in England

  2016cites this paper
• The state, the academy and Indigenous justice: a counter-colonial critique

  2016cites this paper
• Perceived barriers and facilitators to positive therapeutic change for people with intellectual disabilities

  2016cites this paper
• Governing Well in Community-Based Research: Lessons from Canada’s HIV Research Sector on Ethics, Publics and the Care of the Self

  2016cites this paper
• Governing Well in Community-Based Research: Lessons from Canada's HIV Research Sector on Ethics, Publics and the Care of the Self.

  2016cites this paper
• High risk yet invisible: conflicting narratives on social research involving children and young people, and the role of Research Ethics Committees

  2015cites this paper
• Participatory research, people with intellectual disabilities and ethical approval: making reasonable adjustments to enable participation.

  2015cites this paper
• “RESEARCH WITH” INSTEAD OF “RESEARCH ON”: ACTION RESEARCH WITH “VULNERABLE”PARTICIPANTS

  2015cites this paper
• Ethics of Listening: Examining Methods and Praxes Toward a Community-Centred Art

  2015cites this paper
• Strategies for Developing Interpersonal Communication Skills for Business Students

  2015influential citation
• Research on U.S. Military Women: Recruitment and Retention Challenges and Strategies.

  2015cites this paper
• To Include, or Not to Include? Accuracy of Personality Judgments from Resumes with and Without Photographs

  2015cites this paper
• Reflections on access: too vulnerable to research?

  2015cites this paper
• To include or not to include? That is the ethical question

  2014cites this paper
• Determining Sustainable Strategies for Directors of Microfinance Banks in Nigeria

  2014cites this paper
• Capturing the Stories behind the Numbers: The Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study (ARCOS IV), a Qualitative Study

  2014cites this paper
• Medical Dominance within Research Ethics Committees

  2014cites this paper
• A Foucauldian analysis of power relations in an action research study

  2014cites this paper
• Catholic Social Teaching as a Framework for Research Ethics

  2014cites this paper
• Environmental Degradation: Key Challenge to Sustainable Economic Development in the Niger Delta

  2014cites this paper
• Catholic Social Teaching as a Framework for Research Ethics

  2014cites this paper
• The expectations and experiences of newly qualified diagnostic radiographers

  2014cites this paper
• AN INVESTIGATION INTO PATIENTS' AND DIABETES SPECIALIST NURSES' EXPERIENCE OF DIABETES CONSULTATIONS IN PRIMARY CARE

  2014cites this paper
• Resisting Condescending Research Ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand

  2014cites this paper
• Criminological research and institutional ethics protocols : empowering the indigenous other or the academy?

  2013cites this paper
• The Work of Phase I Ethics Committees: Expert and Lay Membership

  2013influential citation
• How do people with intellectual disabilities view abuse and abusers?

  2013cites this paper
• The Effectiveness of the United States Air Force Developmental Teams

  2013cites this paper
• The transformation of the medical ethos and the birth of bioethics in Colombia : a Foucauldian approach

  2013cites this paper
• The importance of moral sensitivity when including persons with dementia in qualitative research

  2013cites this paper
• Informed Consent of 16- to 18-Year-Old Participants in Evaluations

  2013cites this paper
• Resisting the seduction of "ethics creep": using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review.

  2013cites this paper
• Etisk utfordrende å forske på demens

  2012cites this paper
• Empowerment in Community-Based Participatory Research with Persons with Developmental Disabilities: Perspectives of Community Researchers

  2012cites this paper
• Informed consent: are researchers accurately representing risks and benefits?

  2012cites this paper
• Hidden in plain view: The impact of popular beliefs and perceptions, held as factual knowledge about the Criminal Justice System, on incidences of wrongful accusation and conviction

  2012cites this paper
• "We Don't Want the Loonies Taking Over": Examining Masculine Performatives by Private Security in a Hospital Setting

  2012cites this paper
• Researching sensitive and emotive topics: The participants’ voice

  2012influential citation