An unexpected influence of widely used significance thresholds on the distribution of reported P‐values

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Journal of Evolutionary Biology

• Publication date

  2007-05-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01291.xPMID 17465918
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Statistical Tables

  2021cited by this paper
• Error in statistical tests of error in statistical tests

  2006cited by this paper
• Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies

  2004cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis can “fail”: reply to Kotiaho and Tomkins

  2004cited by this paper
• A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias

  2004cited by this paper
• Finding the Missing Science : The Fate of Studies Submitted for Review by a Human Subjects Committee

  2004influential reference
• Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Incongruence between Test Statistics and P Values in Medical Papers

  2004cited by this paper
• Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies

  2003cited by this paper
• The Reliability of P Values

  2003cited by this paper
• Meta‐analysis, can it ever fail?

  2002cited by this paper
• Cribbage

  2001influential reference
• Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

  2001cited by this paper
• The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth.

  2000influential reference
• QUASIREPLICATION AND THE CONTRACT OF ERROR: Lessons from Sex Ratios, Heritabilities and Fluctuating Asymmetry

  2000cited by this paper
• Publication and related biases.

  2000cited by this paper
• The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing

  1999cited by this paper
• Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy

  1999cited by this paper
• Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients

  1999cited by this paper
• Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects

  1997influential reference
• Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs

  1996cited by this paper
• Bayesian reasoning in science

  1991cited by this paper
• ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS

  1989cited by this paper
• Publication bias : a problem in interpreting medical data

  1988influential reference
• Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis

  1987cited by this paper
• Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.

  1983influential reference
• The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

  1979influential reference
• Statistical methods for research workers

  1927influential reference

• Research integrity, thick and thin

  2025cites this paper
• Drawing legs on a snake: A reflection against word count tyranny in academic publishing

  2025cites this paper
• What Do MBA Program in Southeast Asia Scholars Propose for Future COVID-19 Research in Academic Publications? A Topic Analysis Based on Autoencoder

  2023influential citation
• Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research

  2023cites this paper
• Why multiple hypothesis test corrections provide poor control of false positives in the real world.

  2021cites this paper
• p-Values Less Than 0.05 in Psychology: What is Going on?

  2020cites this paper
• Contributions towards understanding and building sustainable science

  2019cites this paper
• Publication Bias and Editorial Statement on Negative Findings

  2019cites this paper
• Methods Matter: P-Hacking and Causal Inference in Economics

  2018cites this paper
• The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.

  2018cites this paper
• I can see clearly now: Reinterpreting statistical significance

  2018influential citation
• Invited review: Reproducible research from noisy data: Revisiting key statistical principles for the animal sciences.

  2018cites this paper
• Meta‐Regression Models and Observational Research

  2017cites this paper
• Experimental Design for Laboratory Biologists: Maximising Information and Improving Reproducibility. By Stanley E. Lazic. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. $175.00 (hardcover); $64.99 (paper). xv + 412 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-1-107-07429-3 (hc); 978-1-107-42488-3 (pb); 978-1-316

  2017cites this paper
• Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature – A systematic review

  2017cites this paper
• p-Curve and Selection Methods as Meta-Analytic Supplements for Biologists: A Demonstration of Effect Size Estimation in Studies of Human Fluctuating Asymmetry

  2017cites this paper
• Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias

  2016cites this paper
• Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions.

  2016cites this paper
• Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?

  2016cites this paper
• The fragility of meta-regression models in observational research

  2016cites this paper
• The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature

  2015cites this paper
• If The Stars Were Mine ” by Melody Gardot 1 Introduction

  2015cites this paper
• The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

  2015cites this paper
• Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size

  2014cites this paper
• Evidence-based vegetation management: prospects and challenges

  2014cites this paper
• The genetic basis for response to the Ketogenic diet in drug-resistant epilepsy

  2014cites this paper
• A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research

  2014cites this paper
• P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.

  2014cites this paper
• 13. Recovering Missing or Partial Data from Studies: A Survey of Conversions and Imputations for Meta-analysis

  2013cites this paper
• Identifying genuine effects in observational research by means of meta-regressions

  2013cites this paper
• 12. Software for Statistical Meta-analysis

  2013cites this paper
• 5. Extraction and Critical Appraisal of Data

  2013cites this paper
• Distinguishing true from false positives in genomic studies: p values

  2013cites this paper
• 21. Graphical Presentation of Results

  2013cites this paper
• 22. Power Statistics for Meta-analysis: Tests for Mean Effects and Homogeneity

  2013cites this paper
• Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science

  2012influential citation
• Inappropriate Fiddling with Statistical Analyses to Obtain a Desirable P-value: Tests to Detect its Presence in Published Literature

  2012cites this paper
• The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis

  2009cites this paper
• NORTHWESTERN SALAMANDER (AMBYSTOMA GRACILE) OVIPOSITION SITES AND HATCHING SUCCESS IN THE CASCADE MOUNTAINS OF SOUTHERN WASHINGTON

  2007cites this paper
• Garden of the forking paths

  year unknowncites this paper
• Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 a Surge of P-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in Recent Decades (but Negative Results Are Increasing Rapidly Too)

  year unknowncites this paper