A Framework for Developing Objective and Measurable Recovery Criteria for Threatened and Endangered Species

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Conservation Biology

• Publication date

  2014-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/cobi.12155PMID 24112040
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Combined Influences of Model Choice, Data Quality, and Data Quantity When Estimating Population Trends

  2015cited by this paper
• Renewable Energy and the Free Movement of Goods

  2015cited by this paper
• By the Numbers: How is Recovery Defined by the US Endangered Species Act?

  2012cited by this paper
• Strength in Numbers: Setting Quantitative Criteria for Listing Species Under the Endangered Species Act

  2012cited by this paper
• The Route to Best Science in Implementation of the Endangered Species Act’s Consultation Mandate: The Benefits of Structured Effects Analysis

  2011cited by this paper
• The science and application of ecological monitoring

  2010cited by this paper
• Geography and Recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

  2010cited by this paper
• Evaluating the protection of wildlife in parks: the case of African buffalo in Serengeti

  2010cited by this paper
• Population viability management: ecological standards to guide adaptive management for rare species

  2009cited by this paper
• Incorporating ecological drivers and uncertainty into a demographic population viability analysis for the island fox

  2009cited by this paper
• The Future of Fisheries Science: Merging Stock Assessment with Risk Assessment, for Better Fisheries Management

  2009cited by this paper
• A Quantitative Threats Analysis for the Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris)

  2007cited by this paper
• Merging Precaution with Sound Science under the Endangered Species Act

  2007cited by this paper
• Importance of Well‐Designed Monitoring Programs for the Conservation of Endangered Species: Case Study of the Snail Kite

  2007cited by this paper
• Modeling Approaches in Avian Conservation and the Role of Field Biologists

  2006cited by this paper
• The Normative Dimension and Legal Meaning of Endangered and Recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act

  2006cited by this paper
• Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time.

  2006cited by this paper
• How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation

  2005cited by this paper
• Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology.

  2004cited by this paper
• Population viability analysis

  2003cited by this paper
• Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2003. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA

  2003cited by this paper
• Using Population Viability Analysis to Develop Recovery Criteria for Endangered Insects: Case Study of the Fender's Blue Butterfly

  2003cited by this paper
• POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS IN ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS: PAST USE AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS

  2002cited by this paper
• Quantitative conservation biology : theory and practice of population viability analysis

  2002cited by this paper
• ARE WE RECOVERING? AN EVALUATION OF RECOVERY CRITERIA UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

  2002cited by this paper
• Critiques of PVA Ask the Wrong Questions: Throwing the Heuristic Baby Out with the Numerical Bath Water

  2002cited by this paper
• Developing Classification Criteria under the U.S. Endangered Species Act: Bowhead Whales as a Case Study

  2001cited by this paper
• Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data

  2001cited by this paper
• The use and abuse of population viability analysis.

  2001cited by this paper
• Science and the Endangered Species Act

  1996cited by this paper
• AN INTRODUCTION TO BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRONMENTAL

  1996cited by this paper
• Strengthening the Use of Science In Achieving the Goals of the Endangered Species Act: An Assessment By the Ecological Society of America

  1996cited by this paper
• Implementing the Endangered Species Act Assessing the listing of species as endangered or threatened

  1996cited by this paper
• Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants

  1994cited by this paper
• Four Facts Every Conservation Biologists Should Know about Persistence

  1994cited by this paper
• Status and prospects for success of the endangered species act: a look at recovery plans.

  1993cited by this paper
• Endangered species act.

  1993cited by this paper
• Estimation of Growth and Extinction Parameters for Endangered Species

  1991cited by this paper
• Where Ickes Went Right or Reason and Rationality in Environmental Law

  1987cited by this paper
• Viable Populations for Conservation: The demography of chance extinction

  1987cited by this paper
• A Simple Mechanism that Causes Collapsing Stability Regions in Exploited Salmonid Populations

  1977cited by this paper

• The Effect of Federal Delisting on US Wolf Population Dynamics

  2026cites this paper
• Using population viability analysis to inform and adapt ex situ conservation activities benefitting a critically endangered butterfly

  2025cites this paper
• Monitoring to assess the recovery status of imperiled species should be commensurate with the criteria for their recovery: the case of Bull Trout

  2025cites this paper
• Using resiliency, redundancy, and representation in a Bayesian belief network to assess imperilment of riverine fishes

  2024cites this paper
• Population Status of the Endangered Plant Orobanche filicicola and Optimal Sampling Design for Growth Monitoring1a

  2024cites this paper
• Designing fit‐for‐purpose monitoring – A case study of a cryptic songbird

  2024cites this paper
• Assumptions about survival estimates and dispersal processes can have severe impacts on population viability assessments

  2024cites this paper
• Predicting the population viability of an endangered amphibian under environmental and demographic uncertainty

  2023cites this paper
• Data collection and analysis methods to evaluate potential impacts of seismic surveys and other marine industrial activities on baleen whales

  2023cites this paper
• Estimating population viability of the northern Great Plains piping plover population considering updated population structure, climate change, and intensive management

  2023cites this paper
• PVA-based Assessment of Resiliency, Redundancy, and Representation in an Imperiled Freshwater Turtle

  2023cites this paper
• Demographic Modeling Refines Assessment of Three Populations of a Long-Lived Threatened Plant

  2022cites this paper
• Marine Mammal Noise Exposure Criteria: Assessing the Severity of Marine Mammal Behavioral Responses to Human Noise

  2021cites this paper
• False dichotomy in population viability analysis quality assessment: reply to Lawson et al.

  2021cites this paper
• The Legal Foundations of Conservation Biology

  2020cites this paper
• A novel modelling framework to explicitly simulate predator interaction with poison baits

  2020cites this paper
• Prioritizing threat management across terrestrial and freshwater realms for species conservation and recovery

  2020cites this paper
• Application of multiple‐population viability analysis to evaluate species recovery alternatives

  2019cites this paper
• Comparative Analysis of Plant Demographic Traits Across Species of Different Conservation Concern: Implications for Pesticide Risk Assessment

  2019cites this paper
• A critical appraisal of population viability analysis

  2019cites this paper
• Raising the bar: Recovery ambition for species at risk in Canada and the US

  2019cites this paper
• Population viability analyses in New Zealand: a review

  2018cites this paper
• Development of a Species Status Assessment Process for Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

  2018cites this paper
• Predictability of demographic rates based on phylogeny and biological similarity

  2018cites this paper
• Spatially-explicit model for assessing wild dog control strategies in Western Australia.

  2018cites this paper
• Modelling different reintroduction strategies for the critically endangered Floreana mockingbird

  2017cites this paper
• From forecasting vulnerabilities to assessing recovery: the utility of demographic models in addressing population declines

  2017cites this paper
• A Decision-theory Approach to Cost-effective Population Supplementation for Imperiled Species

  2017cites this paper
• vortexR: an R package for post Vortex simulation analysis

  2017cites this paper
• A General Framework for Setting Quantitative Population Objectives for Wildlife Conservation - eScholarship

  2017influential citation
• Integrating biology, field logistics, and simulations to optimize parameter estimation for imperiled species

  2016cites this paper
• Species‐level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment

  2016cites this paper
• Recommendations for Improving Recovery Criteria under the US Endangered Species Act

  2015cites this paper
• A risk assessment approach to ecological decision-making

  2015cites this paper
• Beyond PVA: Why Recovery under the Endangered Species Act Is More than Population Viability

  2015cites this paper
• Using ecological theory to develop recovery criteria for an endangered butterfly

  2015cites this paper
• Investigating the direct and indirect effects of introduced greenback cutthroat trout on boreal toad recruitment

  2015cites this paper
• Combined Influences of Model Choice, Data Quality, and Data Quantity When Estimating Population Trends

  2015cites this paper
• The impact of Natura 2000 on forest management: a socio-ecological analysis in the continental region of the European Union

  2014cites this paper