Interpretation of digital radiographs by pediatric critical care physicians using Web-based bedside personal computers versus diagnostic workstations*

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2003

• Venue

  Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

• Publication date

  2003-01-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1097/00130478-200301000-00005PMID 12656538
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: A comparison of 2.5 K × 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film

  2005cited by this paper
• An automated PACS workstation interface: a timesaving enhancement.

  2000cited by this paper
• A picture archival and communication system shortens delays in obtaining radiographic information in a medical intensive care unit

  2000cited by this paper
• Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists.

  1999cited by this paper
• The electronic transformation of radiology: commentary.

  1998cited by this paper
• Digital Radiology in Skeletal Trauma: Assessment of Casualty Officers' Performance

  1998cited by this paper
• A comparison between digital images viewed on a Picture Archiving and Communication System diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians

  1998cited by this paper
• Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis.

  1997cited by this paper
• Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.

  1997cited by this paper
• Detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities of the lungs on digitized chest radiographs: acceptable data compression ratios.

  1996cited by this paper
• Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.

  1996cited by this paper
• Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit.

  1996cited by this paper
• Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: teleradiology workstation versus radiograph readings.

  1995cited by this paper
• Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus film-digitized radiography.

  1994cited by this paper
• Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography.

  1992cited by this paper
• Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.

  1992cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.

  1992cited by this paper
• Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.

  1991cited by this paper
• Mediastinal abnormalities: detection with storage phosphor digital radiography.

  1991cited by this paper
• Clinical evaluation of irreversible image compression: analysis of chest imaging with computed radiography.

  1990cited by this paper
• Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.

  1990cited by this paper
• Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit.

  1988cited by this paper

• Computed and Digital Radiography in Neonatal Chest Examination

  2008cites this paper
• Influence of film digitization on radiological interpretation.

  2005cites this paper
• Where is the chest radiograph?

  2003cites this paper
• Where is the chest radiograph

  2003cites this paper
• Critical Care & Patient Information Systems -references Eleven Critical Success Factors for Implementing Electronic Medical Records Ge Medical Systems

  year unknowncites this paper