Attitudes and beliefs of non‐participants in a population‐based screening programme for colorectal cancer

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Health Expectations

• Publication date

  2015-10-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Sociology, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/hex.12157PMID 24268129PMCID PMC5060871
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences

  2012cited by this paper
• Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot

  2011cited by this paper
• Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data

  2011cited by this paper
• The role of physician reminders in faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening

  2011cited by this paper
• Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England.

  2011cited by this paper
• Pre-notification Increases Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in All Demographic Groups: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Effect of evidence based risk information on “informed choice” in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: a population-based randomized trial.

  2011cited by this paper
• Answering Patient Questions about the Role Lifestyle Factors Play in Cancer Onset and Recurrence

  2010cited by this paper
• A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial

  2010cited by this paper
• Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening decision stage.

  2010cited by this paper
• How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

  2010cited by this paper
• Effect of repeated invitations on uptake of colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: analysis of prevalence and incidence screening

  2010cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention

  2009cited by this paper
• Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processing.

  2009cited by this paper
• Impact of an educational video-based strategy on the behavior process associated with colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled study.

  2009cited by this paper
• The NHS bowel cancer screening programme

  2009cited by this paper
• Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.

  2008cited by this paper
• Predicting the impact of the screening programme for colorectal cancer in the UK

  2008cited by this paper
• Ethnic differences in participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in the UK

  2008cited by this paper
• Understanding Intentions and Action in Colorectal Cancer Screening

  2008cited by this paper
• What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study.

  2008cited by this paper
• Low priority main reason not to participate in a colorectal cancer screening program with a faecal occult blood test.

  2008cited by this paper
• Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult.

  2007cited by this paper
• Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK.

  2007cited by this paper
• A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening

  2007cited by this paper
• The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England

  2007cited by this paper
• Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations and guideline adherence by physicians from digestive endoscopy centers in the Lazio region, Italy.

  2006cited by this paper
• Applying a stage model of behavior change to colon cancer screening.

  2005cited by this paper
• Workgroup IV: public education. UICC International Workshop on Facilitating Screening for Colorectal Cancer, Oslo, Norway (29 and 30 June 2002).

  2005cited by this paper
• The immunochemical faecal occult blood test leads to higher compliance than the guaiac for colorectal cancer screening programmes: a cluster randomized controlled trial

  2005cited by this paper
• The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT.

  2004cited by this paper
• Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations.

  2004cited by this paper
• Self-Sampling in Screening to Reduce Mortality from Colorectal Cancer: A Qualitative Exploration of the Decision to Complete a Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT)

  2004cited by this paper
• Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.

  2003cited by this paper
• Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner

  2002cited by this paper
• Barriers to screening for colorectal cancer.

  2002cited by this paper
• Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer.

  2002cited by this paper
• Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process.

  2001cited by this paper
• Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial

  2000cited by this paper
• Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

  2000cited by this paper
• Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening.

  2000cited by this paper
• Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd ed.

  1998cited by this paper
• Screening

  1991cited by this paper

• Attitudes and information-needs towards a risk-based optimization of colorectal cancer screening among Danish citizens: a qualitative study

  2026cites this paper
• Choice of colon capsule or colonoscopy versus default colonoscopy in FIT positive patients in the Danish screening programme: a parallel group randomised controlled trial

  2025cites this paper
• Reduced healthcare costs for patients with screen-detected colorectal cancer: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

  2025cites this paper
• The effect of implementing colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening on participation and sociodemographic inequalities: A parallel group randomised controlled trial.

  2025cites this paper
• Disparity in Cancer Screening Among Black and Other Ethnic Minority Groups in the UK.

  2025cites this paper
• Co-designing planning interventions to facilitate participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening

  2024cites this paper
• A Case-Control Study of Cognitive Factors Affecting Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in 50–70-Year-Old Iranian Adults

  2024cites this paper
• Socioeconomic differences in discrepancies between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy

  2024cites this paper
• Attitudes to multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for population-based screening: A qualitative study in Great Britain.

  2024cites this paper
• Digital tools to support informed decision making among screening invitees in a vulnerable position for population-based cancer screening: A scoping review

  2024cites this paper
• Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

  2023cites this paper
• The Barriers to Bowel Cancer Screening Scale: Examining Structural Validity, Measurement Invariance, and Criterion Validity

  2023cites this paper
• Individuals With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer Warrant Tailored Interventions to Address Patient-Reported Barriers to Screening

  2023cites this paper
• Subsequent participation in organized FIT based screening following screen-derived colonoscopy – A Danish nationwide cohort study

  2023cites this paper
• Bowel cancer knowledge gaps evident among Irish residents: results of a national questionnaire survey

  2023cites this paper
• Impact of family history of cancer on colorectal cancer screening: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

  2023cites this paper
• Anticipatory anxiety and participation in cancer screening. A systematic review

  2023cites this paper
• Actitudes e imágenes sociales sobre el cribado de cáncer colorrectal. Una aproximación exploratoria mediante grupos de discusión

  2023cites this paper
• Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population

  2023cites this paper
• The role of need for control and self‐reliance in gender and age differences in bowel cancer screening participation

  2022cites this paper
• A health action process approach for developing invitee endorsed interventions to increase mail‐out bowel cancer screening

  2022influential citation
• Psychological distress and bowel cancer screening participation

  2022cites this paper
• Barriers for Participation in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a Qualitative Study

  2022cites this paper
• Risk and the importance of absent symptoms in constructions of the ‘cancer candidate’

  2022cites this paper
• Development and psychometric evaluation of the Aversion to Bowel Cancer Screening Scale

  2022cites this paper
• Self-Reported Reasons for Inconsistent Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using FIT in Flanders, Belgium

  2022cites this paper
• The integrated screening action model (I-SAM): A theory-based approach to inform intervention development

  2021cites this paper
• Ethnic disparities in the uptake of colorectal cancer screening: An analysis of the West London population

  2021cites this paper
• Mail‐out bowel cancer screening: Identifying the behavioural stumbling blocks

  2021cites this paper
• Facilitators and barriers to participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programme from the perspective of healthcare professionals: Qualitative research study.

  2021cites this paper
• Understanding patient factors to increase uptake of cancer screening: a review.

  2021influential citation
• Bowel health and screening: evaluating a peer-led educational intervention for people with learning disabilities

  2021cites this paper
• Barriers to home bowel cancer screening

  2021cites this paper
• Sociodemographics and their impacts on risk factor awareness and beliefs about cancer and screening: results from a cross-sectional study in Newfoundland and Labrador

  2020cites this paper
• Ways to use interventions to increase participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2020cites this paper
• Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening

  2020cites this paper
• Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening

  2020cites this paper
• Barriers and facilitators to participate in the colorectal cancer screening programme in Flanders (Belgium): a focus group study

  2020influential citation
• Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening in a low-income urban community in Mexico City

  2020cites this paper
• Implementation Strategies for Interventions Aiming to Increase Participation in Mail-Out Bowel Cancer Screening Programs: A Realist Review

  2020influential citation
• Impact of the introduction of a new policy of direct faecal immunochemical home screening test provision in a national bowel screening programme, both during and outside of advertising campaigns.

  2020cites this paper
• Factors Related to Non-participation in the Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme

  2020cites this paper
• Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.

  2020cites this paper
• Cancer beliefs and participation in screening for colorectal cancer: A Danish cohort study based on data from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership and national registers.

  2019cites this paper
• Patient perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and the role of general practice

  2019cites this paper
• Cancer screening: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions

  2019cites this paper
• Bowel cancer screening

  2019cites this paper
• Autonomous and informed decision- making in real life: The case of colorectal cancer screening

  2019cites this paper
• Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?

  2019cites this paper
• "I'm not doing that." An in-depth examination of nonparticipation in mail-out bowel cancer screening programs.

  2019cites this paper
• Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative study

  2019cites this paper
• Determinants of non-participation in colon examination following positive stool sample in colorectal cancer screening.

  2019cites this paper
• Colorectal Cancer Screening Education in Faith-Based Communities

  2018influential citation
• Factors influencing the decision to attend screening for cancer in the UK: a meta-ethnography of qualitative research

  2018cites this paper
• Les déterminants psychosociaux de la participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal : Enjeux de l'arrivée du nouveau test immunologique

  2018cites this paper
• It’s hard to reach the “hard-to-reach”: the challenges of recruiting people who do not access preventative healthcare services into interview studies

  2018cites this paper
• Why are the public so positive about colorectal cancer screening?

  2018cites this paper
• Public awareness of cancer screening

  2018cites this paper
• GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project

  2017cites this paper
• Testing innovative strategies to reduce the social gradient in the uptake of bowel cancer screening: a programme of four qualitatively enhanced randomised controlled trial

  2017influential citation
• Approaching the Hard-to-Reach in Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening: an Overview of Individual, Provider and System Level Coping Strategies

  2017cites this paper
• The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Program: current perspectives on strategies for improvement

  2017cites this paper
• The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?

  2016cites this paper
• Women’s intentions to Human Papillomavirus self-sample: development of an intervention to increase self-sampling intentions

  2016cites this paper
• Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer

  2016cites this paper
• Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening—a qualitative study in an ethnic and socio‐economically diverse inner city population

  2016cites this paper
• Increased uptake and improved outcomes of bowel cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: results from a pilot study within the national screening programme in England

  2016cites this paper
• Health Research, Qualitative

  2015cites this paper
• A population-based study of the extent of colorectal cancer screening in men with HIV

  2015cites this paper
• Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study

  2015cites this paper
• Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review

  2015cites this paper
• Obstacles to the uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: what remains to be achieved by French national programmes?

  2014cites this paper
• Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study

  2014cites this paper
• Impacts des incitatifs économiques en médecine générale : Analyse des préférences et des motivations des médecins

  2014cites this paper