Promoting Transparency in Evolutionary Biology and Ecology

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Systematic Botany

• Publication date

  2016-07-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1600/036364416X692262PMID 27282313
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

  2016cited by this paper
• Elevating the status of code in ecology

  2015cited by this paper
• A meta‐analysis of the effects of nutrient enrichment on litter decomposition in streams

  2015cited by this paper
• Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording

  2015cited by this paper
• Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum

  2015cited by this paper
• Blind trust in unblinded observation in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior

  2015cited by this paper
• Promoting an open research culture

  2015cited by this paper
• Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution

  2013cited by this paper
• What do we really know about the signalling role of plumage colour in blue tits? A case study of impediments to progress in evolutionary biology

  2013cited by this paper
• Confirmation Bias in Studies of Nestmate Recognition: A Cautionary Note for Research into the Behaviour of Animals

  2013cited by this paper
• Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta‐analysis

  2012cited by this paper
• Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices.

  2011cited by this paper
• Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions

  2011cited by this paper
• “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences

  2010cited by this paper
• Data archiving

  2010cited by this paper
• Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology

  2006cited by this paper
• A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology

  2004cited by this paper
• How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists?

  2002cited by this paper
• The "File Drawer Problem" of Non-Significant Results: Does It Apply to Biological Research?

  1996cited by this paper
• The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results

  1979cited by this paper

• Code sharing in ecology and evolution increases citation rates but remains uncommon

  2024cites this paper
• Functional R code is rare in species distribution and abundance papers

  2024cites this paper
• Empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting in ecology

  2023cites this paper
• Ten simple rules for reporting information on species interactions

  2022cites this paper
• Early Undergraduate Biostatistics & Data Science Introduction Using R, R Studio & the Tidyverse

  2022cites this paper
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension

  2021influential citation
• Replication in field ecology: Identifying challenges and proposing solutions

  2021cites this paper
• The neglected impact of tracking devices on terrestrial arthropods

  2020cites this paper
• Open Science principles for accelerating trait-based science across the Tree of Life

  2020cites this paper
• Can't see the “hood” for the trees: Can avian cooperative breeding currently be understood using the phylogenetic comparative method?

  2020cites this paper
• Is less more? A commentary on the practice of ‘metric hacking’ in animal social network analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Consequences of multiple imputation of missing standard deviations and sample sizes in meta‐analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Queen pheromones, colony odors, and better science: a comment on Holman

  2018cites this paper
• Ecological Network Metrics: Opportunities for Synthesis

  2017cites this paper
• Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution

  2017cites this paper
• Will your paper be used in a meta‐analysis? Make the reach of your research broader and longer lasting

  2017cites this paper
• Usability , and Reproducibility : A Four-Step Plan toward Improved Comparative Databases Using Primates as Examples

  2017cites this paper
• Sustainable Digital Environments: What Major Challenges Is Humankind Facing?

  2016cites this paper
• Analysis of publication trends of biodiversity data papers

  2016influential citation
• Transparency, usability, and reproducibility: Guiding principles for improving comparative databases using primates as examples

  2016cites this paper