Aim Even though systematic reviews have examined how aspects of propensity score methods are used, none has reviewed how the challenge of missing data is addressed with these methods. This review there-fore describes how missing data are addressed with propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness studies. Methods Published articles on observational comparative effectiveness studies were extracted from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Results Our search yielded 167 eligible articles. Majority of these studies (114; 68%) conducted complete case analysis with only 53 of them stating this in the methods. Only 16 articles reported use of multiple imputation. Conclusion Few researchers use correct methods for handling missing data or reported missing data methodology which may lead to reporting biased findings.
Handling missing data in propensity score estimation in comparative effectiveness evaluations: a systematic review
Lucas Malla,Rafael Perera-Salazar,E. McFadden,Morris Ogero,K. Stepniewska,M. English
Published 2017 in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Publication date
2017-10-05
- Fields of study
Medicine, Economics
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-28 of 28 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-35 of 35 citing papers · Page 1 of 1