A gap analysis comparing the effectiveness of Natura 2000 and national protected area networks in representing European amphibians and reptiles

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Biodiversity and Conservation

• Publication date

  2015-01-20

• Fields of study

  Biology, Geography, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-0862-3
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

  2014cited by this paper
• Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe

  2014cited by this paper
• Protected areas and insect conservation: questioning the effectiveness of Natura 2000 network for saproxylic beetles in Italy

  2013cited by this paper
• Do protected areas represent species' optimal climatic conditions? A test using Iberian water beetles

  2013cited by this paper
• The conservation status of the world's reptiles

  2013cited by this paper
• “Mind the gap!” – How well does Natura 2000 cover species of European interest?

  2012cited by this paper
• Conolophus marthae. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1. .

  2012cited by this paper
• Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network

  2012cited by this paper
• Protected areas in Europe:an overview

  2012cited by this paper
• The sensitivity of gap analysis to conservation targets

  2011cited by this paper
• Is the Natura 2000 network sufficient for conservation of butterfly diversity? A case study in Slovenia

  2011cited by this paper
• Climate change threatens European conservation areas

  2011cited by this paper
• Misleading results from conventional gap analysis – Messages from the warming north

  2011influential reference
• Gap analysis of European wetland species: priority regions for expanding the Natura 2000 network

  2011cited by this paper
• The efficacy of Romania's protected areas network in conserving biodiversity

  2010influential reference
• IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

  2010cited by this paper
• Extent of the Global Network of Terrestrial Protected Areas

  2010influential reference
• Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system.

  2009influential reference
• Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians

  2008cited by this paper
• Are the endemic water beetles of the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands effectively protected

  2008cited by this paper
• Protected Areas in Europe

  2008influential reference
• Contribution of the Natura 2000 Network to Biodiversity Conservation in Italy

  2007influential reference
• Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: the efficiency of reserve networks.

  2007cited by this paper
• The Effectiveness of Iberian Protected Areas in Conserving Terrestrial Biodiversity

  2007influential reference
• Au th or ' s pe rs on al co py Are threatened lichen species well-protected in Spain ? Effectiveness of a protected areas network

  2006cited by this paper
• Nature protection in Greece: an appraisal of the factors shaping integrative conservation and policy effectiveness

  2006cited by this paper
• The status and distribution of reptiles and amphibians of the Mediterranean basin

  2006cited by this paper
• Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: Priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape

  2006influential reference
• Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets

  2005cited by this paper
• Matching species with reserves – uncertainties from using data at different resolutions

  2004influential reference
• Questioning the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 Special Areas of Conservation strategy: the case of Crete

  2004cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity

  2004influential reference
• Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design

  2004cited by this paper
• NATURE RESERVES: DO THEY CAPTURE THE FULL RANGE OF AMERICA'S BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY?

  2001cited by this paper
• Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity.

  2001cited by this paper
• Using presence–absence data to establish reserve selection procedures that are robust to temporal species turnover

  2000cited by this paper
• The Atlas of European Mammals. A. J. Mitchell-Jones , G. Amori , W. Bogdanowicz , B. Kryštufek , P. J. H. Reijnders , F. Spitzenberger , M. Stubbe , J. B. M. Thissen , V. Vohralik , J. Zima

  2000cited by this paper
• National‐scale conservation assessments at an appropriate resolution

  2000cited by this paper
• Systematic conservation planning

  2000influential reference
• The Atlas of European Mammals

  1999cited by this paper

• Beyond coverage: Effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in conserving breeding bird populations in a highly anthropogenic region

  2026cites this paper
• Priority areas for arthropod conservation in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands: Insights from a multi‐taxon distributional database

  2026cites this paper
• A novel multidimensional framework for bridging conservation gaps and optimizing the system of natural reserves for biodiversity: A case study of Dongying, China

  2025cites this paper
• Protected areas unevenly contribute to terrestrial vertebrate habitat conservation in China

  2025cites this paper
• Environmental heterogeneity and lizard assemblages in riparian areas in Cyprus

  2024cites this paper
• Year-round differences in the use of roosting sites in an endangered vulture reveal gaps in protected areas coverage

  2024cites this paper
• Protected areas and the ranges of threatened species: Towards the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030

  2023cites this paper
• A multitaxonomic assessment of Natura 2000 effectiveness across European biogeographic regions

  2023cites this paper
• Differential vulnerability to biological invasions: not all protected areas (and not all invaders) are the same

  2022cites this paper
• How Well Do Protected Areas Safeguard Endangered White-Clawed Crayfish in Croatia?

  2022cites this paper
• Water beetles from Castilla-La Mancha (Central Iberia): species and areas of interest

  2022cites this paper
• Prioritisation mismatch using dispersal-based connectivity assessment

  2021cites this paper
• Dispersal-based species pools as sources of connectivity area mismatches

  2021cites this paper
• Biodiversity modelling reveals a significant gap between diversity hotspots and protected areas for Iranian reptiles

  2021cites this paper
• Assessing Natura 2000 coverage of river fish species in Greece: What do field surveys show?

  2021cites this paper
• Biodiverse river basins: assessing coverage of protected areas for terrestrial vertebrates

  2021cites this paper
• Iberian Protected Areas Capture Regional Functional, Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Diversity of Most Tetrapod Groups

  2021cites this paper
• How well does NATURA 2000 protect threatened stone crayfish in Croatia?

  2021cites this paper
• The Natura 2000 network and the ranges of threatened species in Greece

  2021cites this paper
• Impact of disturbance on community structure, biomass and carbon stock in montane evergreen forests of Meghalaya, northeast India

  2021cites this paper
• Assessing the role of the aquatic Natura 2000 network to protect both freshwater European species of community interest and threatened species in a Mediterranean region

  2021cites this paper
• Long-term effectiveness of Natura 2000 network to protect biodiversity: A hint of optimism for common birds

  2021cites this paper
• Toward An Innovative Strategic Approach For Sustainable Management Of Natural Protected Areas In Italy

  2020cites this paper
• Evaluating and expanding the European Union's protected‐area network toward potential post‐2020 coverage targets

  2020cites this paper
• Species protection in areas conserved through community-driven direct democracy as compared with a large private land trust in California

  2020cites this paper
• Identifying factors and predicting the future land-use change of protected area in the agricultural landscape of Malaysian peninsula for conservation planning

  2020cites this paper
• A potential threat to amphibians in the European Natura 2000 network: Forecasting the distribution of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus

  2020cites this paper
• Expansion of protected area networks integrating ecosystem service and social-ecological coordination

  2020cites this paper
• Effectiveness of the European Natura 2000 network at protecting Western Europe's agro-steppes

  2020cites this paper
• Analysis of the contribution to conservation and effectiveness of the wetland reserve network in China based on wildlife diversity

  2019cites this paper
• EU protected area network did not prevent a country wide population decline in a threatened grassland bird

  2018cites this paper
• Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?

  2018cites this paper
• Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network in protecting Iberian endemic fauna

  2018cites this paper
• Common bats are more abundant within Natura 2000 areas

  2018cites this paper
• Influence of extent and data type on spatial conservation prioritization

  2018cites this paper
• Matches and mismatches between conservation investments and biodiversity values in the European Union

  2018cites this paper
• Is the Natura 2000 network of the European Union the key land use policy tool for preserving Europe's biodiversity heritage?

  2017cites this paper
• Deficiencies in Natura 2000 for protecting recovering large carnivores: A spotlight on the wolf Canis lupus in Poland

  2017cites this paper
• Meeting the Aichi targets: Pushing for zero extinction conservation

  2017cites this paper
• Impact of land reclamation and agricultural water regime on the distribution and conservation status of the endangered Dryophytes suweonensis

  2017cites this paper
• Defining the importance of landscape metrics for large branchiopod biodiversity and conservation: the case of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands

  2017cites this paper
• Fine-scale determinants of conservation value of river reaches in a hotspot of native and non-native species diversity.

  2017cites this paper
• Conservation on the blink: Deficient technical reports threaten conservation in the Natura 2000 network

  2017cites this paper
• The contribution of non‐protected areas to the conservation of Eurasian Eagle‐owls in Mediterranean ecosystems

  2017cites this paper
• Are species listed in the Annex II of the Habitats Directive better represented in Natura 2000 network than the remaining species? A test using Spanish bats

  2015cites this paper
• Using null models to identify under-represented species in protected areas: A case study using European amphibians and reptiles

  2015cites this paper
• Influência da extensão, do grão e do tipo de dado sobre a seleção de áreas prioritárias para a conservação

  2015cites this paper
• GAP ANALYSIS REVEALED A MODERATE EFFICIENCY OF PROTECTED AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE ENDANGERED NOBLE CRAYFISH IN CROATIA

  year unknowncites this paper