Choosing an option increases a person’s preference for that option. This phenomenon, called choice-based learning (CBL), has been investigated separately in the contexts of internally guided decision-making (IDM, e.g., preference judgment), for which no objectively correct answer exists and externally guided decision making (EDM, e.g., perceptual decision making), for which one objectively correct answer exists. For the present study, we compared decision making of these two types to examine differences of underlying neural processes of CBL. As IDM and EDM tasks, occupation preference judgment and salary judgment were used, respectively. To compare CBL for the two types of decision making, we developed a novel measurement of CBL: decision consistency. When CBL occurs, decision consistency is higher in the last-half trials than in first-half trials. Electroencephalography (EEG) data have demonstrated that the change of decision consistency is positively correlated with the fronto-central beta–gamma power after response in the first-half trials for IDM, but not for EDM. Those results demonstrate for the first time the difference of CBL between IDM and EDM. The fronto-central beta–gamma power is expected to reflect a key process of CBL, specifically for IDM.
Post-response βγ power predicts the degree of choice-based learning in internally guided decision-making
Takashi Nakao,N. Kanayama,K. Katahira,Misaki Odani,Yosuke Ito,Yuki Hirata,Reika Nasuno,Hanako Ozaki,Ryosuke Hiramoto,M. Miyatani,G. Northoff
Published 2016 in Scientific Reports
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2016
- Venue
Scientific Reports
- Publication date
2016-08-31
- Fields of study
Medicine, Computer Science, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-66 of 66 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-22 of 22 citing papers · Page 1 of 1