A comparison of techniques for assessing farmland bumblebee populations

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Oecologia

• Publication date

  2015-02-14

• Fields of study

  Agricultural and Food Sciences, Medicine, Biology, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00442-015-3255-0PMID 25676106
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats

  2017cited by this paper
• Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields.

  2013cited by this paper
• Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services

  2013cited by this paper
• Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

  2013cited by this paper
• Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss--a meta-analysis.

  2013cited by this paper
• Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees.

  2012cited by this paper
• Humans versus dogs; a comparison of methods for the detection of bumble bee nests

  2012cited by this paper
• Factors influencing moth assemblages in woodland fragments on farmland: implications for woodland management and creation schemes

  2012cited by this paper
• Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits.

  2011cited by this paper
• Potential Bias in Pan Trapping as a Function of Floral Abundance

  2011cited by this paper
• Bumblebees: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation

  2010cited by this paper
• COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data

  2010influential reference
• Estimation of bumblebee queen dispersal distances using sibship reconstruction method

  2010cited by this paper
• Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival

  2010cited by this paper
• Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers.

  2010cited by this paper
• Decline of bumble bees (Bombus) in the North American Midwest

  2009cited by this paper
• Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide

  2009cited by this paper
• MEASURING BEE DIVERSITY IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN HABITATS AND BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS

  2008cited by this paper
• The decline of the bumble bees and cuckoo bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini) of Western and Central Europe

  2007cited by this paper
• Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses.

  2007cited by this paper
• A Comparison of Pan Trap and Intensive Net Sampling Techniques for Documenting a Bee (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) Fauna

  2007cited by this paper
• Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats

  2007cited by this paper
• Genetic diversity and mass resources promote colony size and forager densities of a social bee (Bombus pascuorum) in agricultural landscapes

  2007cited by this paper
• Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops

  2007cited by this paper
• Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes

  2007cited by this paper
• Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale

  2006cited by this paper
• Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

  2006cited by this paper
• Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands

  2006cited by this paper
• Comparing the efficacy of agri‐environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins

  2006cited by this paper
• Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence

  2006cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of new agri-environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes

  2006cited by this paper
• An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species

  2005influential reference
• Does specialization explain rarity and decline among British bumblebees? A response to Goulson et al.

  2005cited by this paper
• A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark–recapture data

  2005cited by this paper
• Unscented Color Traps for Non-Apis Bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes)

  2005cited by this paper
• Pan-trapping for bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in Utah’s west desert: the importance of color diversity

  2005cited by this paper
• Causes of rarity in bumblebees

  2005influential reference
• Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK

  2003cited by this paper
• How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?

  2003cited by this paper
• Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees

  2003cited by this paper
• Non-lethal sampling of DNA from bumble bees for conservation genetics

  2003cited by this paper
• Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale

  2003cited by this paper
• Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?

  2003cited by this paper
• SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS

  2002cited by this paper
• Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic DNA with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT).

  2000cited by this paper
• Foraging Distances of Bombus muscorum, Bombus lapidarius, and Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae)

  2000cited by this paper
• Female mating frequencies in Bombus spp. from Central Europe

  2000cited by this paper
• Sampling Bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) for Pollinator Community Studies: Pitfalls of Pan-trapping

  2000cited by this paper
• Colour‐coded sampling: the pan trap colour preferences of oligolectic and nonoligolectic bees associated with a vernal pool plant

  1999cited by this paper
• A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar

  1999cited by this paper
• Bioindication using trap‐nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions

  1998cited by this paper
• Genetic differentiation of continental and island populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Europe

  1996cited by this paper
• Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera; Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites

  1995cited by this paper
• Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation

  1993cited by this paper
• Rothamsted Repository Download

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Unveiling the association of mangrove flowering phenology on the dynamics of insect abundance

  2025cites this paper
• Assessing wild bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in Calabria (southern Italy)

  2025cites this paper
• Bumble bees (Bombus spp., Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Rhode Island: species richness, relative abundance, and floral visitation.

  2025cites this paper
• Expanding the Scope of the Bumblebee Model BEE‐STEWARD: A Simple Foraging Module Facilitates the Parameterization

  2025cites this paper
• High-Res Acoustic and Environmental Data to Monitor Bombus dahlbomii Amid Invasive Species, Habitat Loss

  2025cites this paper
• Standardising bee sampling: A systematic review of pan trapping and associated floral surveys

  2024influential citation
• Standardized transect walks outperform pan traps in assessing wild bee community in a Mediterranean protected area (Asinara National Park, Italy)

  2024cites this paper
• Diurnal versus nocturnal pollination in a subalpine wetland: from network structure to plant reproduction

  2024cites this paper
• Crop-Specific Effects on Pan-Trap Sampling of Potential Pollinators as Influenced by Trap Color and Location

  2023cites this paper
• Adapting to changing methodology in a long-term experiment

  2023cites this paper
• Seasonal patterns of beneficial phytochemical availability in honey and stored pollen from honey bee colonies in large apiaries

  2023cites this paper
• Higher floral richness promotes rarer bee communities across remnant and reconstructed tallgrass prairies, though remnants contain higher abundances of a threatened bumble bee (Bombus Latreille)

  2023cites this paper
• Estimating bee abundance: can mark-recapture methods validate common sampling protocols?

  2022cites this paper
• A novel method for monitoring ground-dwelling arthropods on hard substrates: characterizing arthropod biodiversity among survey methods

  2022cites this paper
• Landscape Context Influences the Bee Conservation Value of Wildflower Plantings

  2021cites this paper
• Color pan traps often catch less when there are more flowers around

  2021cites this paper
• Designing sampling protocols for plant-pollinator interactions - timing, meteorology, flowering variations and failed captures matter

  2021cites this paper
• Experimental calibration of trapping methods for addressing bias in arthropod biodiversity monitoring

  2021cites this paper
• Open‐canopy ponds benefit diurnal pollinator communities in an agricultural landscape: implications for farmland pond management

  2020cites this paper
• The State of Bee Monitoring in the United States: A Call to Refocus Away From Bowl Traps and Towards More Effective Methods

  2020cites this paper
• Pan Traps for Tracking Honey Bee Activity-Density: A Case Study in Soybeans

  2020cites this paper
• Characterization of wild bee communities in apple and blueberry orchards

  2020cites this paper
• Sampling of flower-visiting insects: Poor correspondence between the catches of colour pan-trap and sweep netting

  2019cites this paper
• Monitoring insect pollinators and flower visitation: The effectiveness and feasibility of different survey methods

  2019cites this paper
• Contrasting impacts of highly invasive plant species on flower-visiting insect communities

  2018cites this paper
• Crop rotation and agri‐environment schemes determine bumblebee communities via flower resources

  2018cites this paper
• Enhancing the benefits to biodiversity and ecosystem services within arable field margins

  2018cites this paper
• The Impacts of Habitat Management on Beneficial Insects in Lowbush Blueberry Agroecosystems

  2017cites this paper
• Variability of bumblebee communities (Apidae, Bombini) in urban green areas

  2017cites this paper
• Providing foraging resources for solitary bees on farmland: current schemes for pollinators benefit a limited suite of species

  2017cites this paper
• Sampling technique affects detection of habitat factors influencing wild bee communities

  2017cites this paper
• An expert-assisted citizen science program involving agricultural high schools provides national patterns on bee species assemblages

  2016cites this paper
• Status, Threats and Conservation Recommendations for Wild Bumble Bees (Bombus spp.) in Ontario, Canada: A Review for Policymakers and Practitioners

  2016cites this paper
• The ecology and population genetics of a complex of cryptic bumblebee species

  2016cites this paper
• Effects of flower abundance and colour on pan-trap catches

  2016cites this paper