Reputation based on punishment rather than generosity allows for evolution of cooperation in sizable groups

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Evolution and Human Behavior

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Business, Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2014.09.001
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Assortative mating based on cooperativeness and generosity

  2014cited by this paper
• Individual heterogeneity and costly punishment: a volunteer's dilemma

  2013cited by this paper
• HUMAN COOPERATION BASED ON PUNISHMENT REPUTATION

  2013cited by this paper
• Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans

  2013cited by this paper
• Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment

  2013cited by this paper
• Charitable Giving as a Signal of Trustworthiness: Disentangling the Signaling Benefits of Altruistic Acts

  2013cited by this paper
• Moral assessment in indirect reciprocity

  2012cited by this paper
• Emergence of responsible sanctions without second order free riders, antisocial punishment or spite

  2012cited by this paper
• The evolution of cooperation by social exclusion

  2012cited by this paper
• Indirect reciprocity with trinary reputations

  2012cited by this paper
• Punishment and cooperation in nature.

  2012cited by this paper
• The evolution of punishment

  2012cited by this paper
• The varying relationship between helping and individual quality

  2012cited by this paper
• The evolution of punishment through reputation

  2011cited by this paper
• The Calculus of Selfishness

  2011influential reference
• THE EVOLUTION OF PUNISHMENT IN n‐PLAYER PUBLIC GOODS GAMES: A VOLUNTEER'S DILEMMA

  2011cited by this paper
• To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

  2011cited by this paper
• Replicator dynamics of reward & reputation in public goods games.

  2010cited by this paper
• Coordinated Punishment of Defectors Sustains Cooperation and Can Proliferate When Rare

  2010cited by this paper
• Punishers Benefit From Third-Party Punishment in Fish

  2010cited by this paper
• Incentives and opportunism: from the carrot to the stick

  2010cited by this paper
• Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games

  2010cited by this paper
• The evolutionary significance of costly punishment is still to be demonstrated

  2009cited by this paper
• Costly punishment does not always increase cooperation

  2009cited by this paper
• Winners don’t punish

  2008cited by this paper
• Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks.

  2008cited by this paper
• Evolution and Human Behaviour

  2008cited by this paper
• Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity.

  2007cited by this paper
• Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans.

  2007influential reference
• ReviewEvolutionary Explanations for Cooperation

  2007cited by this paper
• Reputation and the evolution of cooperation in sizable groups

  2005influential reference
• Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem

  2004cited by this paper
• Human behaviour: Don't lose your reputation

  2004influential reference
• Cooperation and Punishment, Especially in Humans

  2004cited by this paper
• Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games

  2003influential reference
• From reciprocity to unconditional altruism through signalling benefits

  2003cited by this paper
• Altruistic punishment in humans

  2002cited by this paper
• The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity.

  2002cited by this paper
• Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’

  2002cited by this paper
• Costly signaling and cooperation.

  2001cited by this paper
• The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation

  2001cited by this paper
• Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity

  2001influential reference
• Reward and punishment

  2001cited by this paper
• Cooperation through image scoring in humans.

  2000cited by this paper
• Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring

  1998cited by this paper
• Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle

  1998cited by this paper
• Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups

  1992cited by this paper
• The evolution of indirect reciprocity

  1989cited by this paper
• The biology of moral systems

  1989influential reference
• The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups.

  1988cited by this paper
• The evolution of cooperation

  1981cited by this paper
• Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach.

  1981cited by this paper
• The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle).

  1977cited by this paper
• Tragedy of the Commons

  1968cited by this paper
• The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

  1964cited by this paper
• The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.

  1964cited by this paper
• Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

  1781cited by this paper

• The cooperation evolution in a three-strategy model including enforcers with the ability to reward, punish and assess

  2026cites this paper
• Offloading punishment to karma: Thinking about karma reduces the punishment of transgressors

  2025cites this paper
• Dynamic indirect reciprocity: The influence of personal reputation and group reputation on cooperative behavior in nested social dilemmas

  2024cites this paper
• Acting without considering personal costs signals trustworthiness in helpers but not punishers

  2024cites this paper
• Indirect reciprocity undermines indirect reciprocity destabilizing large-scale cooperation

  2023cites this paper
• Fairness, partner choice, and punishment: An ethnographic study of cooperative behavior among children in Helsinki, Finland

  2023cites this paper
• Communicating emotions, but not expressing them privately, reduces moral punishment in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game

  2023cites this paper
• Navigating between punishment, avoidance, and instruction: The form and function of responses to moral violations varies across adult and child transgressors.

  2022cites this paper
• Third-party punishers do not compete to be chosen as partners in an experimental game

  2022cites this paper
• A lineage explanation of human normative guidance: the coadaptive model of instrumental rationality and shared intentionality

  2022cites this paper
• HOW DO PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECT INNOVATION AND ADOPTION DECISIONS?

  2022cites this paper
• Zip-merging behavior at Y-intersection based on Intelligent travel points

  2022cites this paper
• It pays to be nice: The benefits of cooperating in markets

  2021cites this paper
• Local reputation, local selection, and the leading eight norms

  2021cites this paper
• The evolution of morality and the role of commitment

  2021cites this paper
• Punitive Sentiment

  2021cites this paper
• The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity

  2021cites this paper
• The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game

  2021cites this paper
• When Costly Punishment Becomes Evolutionarily Beneficial

  2020cites this paper
• Cooperation in Groups of Different Sizes: The Effects of Punishment and Reputation-Based Partner Choice

  2020cites this paper
• Probabilistic punishment and reward under rule of trust-based decision-making in continuous public goods game.

  2019cites this paper
• Gossip, Reputation, and Sustainable Cooperation

  2019influential citation
• The Dose Does it: Punishment and Cooperation in Dynamic Public-Good Games

  2019cites this paper
• Punishment: one tool, many uses

  2019cites this paper
• Influence of Reputation on Cooperative Behavior in Crowd Innovation Network

  2019cites this paper
• The Influence of Cooperation Degree on Behavior Choice in College Students' Entrepreneurial Network

  2019cites this paper
• The emergence and selection of reputation systems that drive cooperative behaviour

  2018cites this paper
• Cooperation Via Intimidation: An Emergent System of Mutual Threats can Maintain Social Order

  2017cites this paper
• Sistemas de reputação: um caso de simulação social em narrativas interativas

  2017cites this paper
• Increasing returns to scale: The solution to the second-order social dilemma

  2016cites this paper
• Reputation, Gossip, and Human Cooperation

  2016cites this paper
• Who Punishes? The Status of the Punishers Affects the Perceived Success of, and Indirect Benefits From, “Moralistic” Punishment

  2016cites this paper
• Effects of Punishment in a Structure Population Playing the Social Dilemma Game by Using Discrete PSO Algorithm

  2015cites this paper
• Social Distance and Control Aversion : Evidence from the Internet and the Laboratory

  2015cites this paper
• Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation

  2015cites this paper
• Understanding Cooperative Behavior Based on the Coevolution of Game Strategy and Link Weight

  2015cites this paper
• Indirect Reciprocity, Gossip, and Reputation-Based Cooperation

  year unknowncites this paper