Reply to article by King et al.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2004

• Venue

  Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

• Publication date

  2004-06-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00234.xPMID 15191463
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour; a systematic review of the evidence and a protocol for administration of nifedipine

  2003cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of nifedipine versus atosiban for tocolysis in preterm labour: a meta‐analysis with an indirect comparison of randomised trials

  2003cited by this paper
• Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta‐adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labour

  2001cited by this paper
• Gestational diabetes. Current recommendations for GPs.

  1997cited by this paper
• Nifedipine and Ritodrine in the Management of Preterm Labor: A Randomized Multicenter Trial

  1997cited by this paper
• Diabetes mellitus.

  1993cited by this paper

• The influence of ritodrine alone or in combination with nifedipine on maternal cardiovascular side effects and pregnancy outcomes.

  2014cites this paper
• Emerging tocolytics for maintenance therapy of preterm labour: oxytocin antagonists and calcium channel blockers

  2006cites this paper
• Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor. Comparison of their efficacy and secondary effects.

  2006cites this paper