Mathematical coupling does not account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important change values.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

• Publication date

  2012-04-01

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.010PMID 21803544
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Mathematical coupling may account for the association between baseline severity and minimally important difference values.

  2010cited by this paper
• Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

  2010cited by this paper
• Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

  2008cited by this paper
• Revisiting the relation between change and initial value: a review and evaluation

  2007cited by this paper
• Patient‐perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): Interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient’s perspective

  2006cited by this paper
• An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life.

  2004cited by this paper
• Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement

  2004cited by this paper
• Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.

  2003cited by this paper
• Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale.

  2001cited by this paper
• Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11‐point numerical pain rating scale

  2001cited by this paper
• Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2.

  1998cited by this paper
• Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1.

  1998cited by this paper
• Understanding changes in health status. Is the floor phenomenon merely the last step of the staircase?

  1997cited by this paper
• Understanding Changes in Health Status

  1997cited by this paper
• Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

  1989cited by this paper

• Intervention differential effects and regression to the mean in studies where sample selection is based on the initial value of the outcome variable: an evaluation of methods illustrated in weight-management studies

  2020cites this paper
• Diagnosing melancholic depression: some personal observations

  2017cites this paper
• The misleading concept of initial severity in depression clinical trials: development and results from a mathematical model

  2017cites this paper
• Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change

  2015cites this paper