Interactions between treatment and continuous covariates: a step toward individualizing therapy.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  Journal of Clinical Oncology

• Publication date

  2008-03-20

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8981PMID 18349388
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Chemoendocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapies for node-negative breast cancer: predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors--International Breast Cancer Study Group.

  2008cited by this paper
• Detecting an interaction between treatment and a continuous covariate: A comparison of two approaches

  2007cited by this paper
• Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea

  2006cited by this paper
• A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials

  2004cited by this paper
• Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.

  2004cited by this paper
• Is treatment with interferon-α effective in all patients with metastatic renal carcinoma? A new approach to the investigation of interactions

  2004cited by this paper
• Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

  2000cited by this paper
• A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data.

  2000cited by this paper
• Modelling the effects of standard prognostic factors in node-positive breast cancer

  1999cited by this paper

• Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine linear or non‐linear treatment‐covariate interactions at multiple time‐points for a continuous outcome

  2024cites this paper
• Favoring the hierarchical constraint in penalized survival models for randomized trials in precision medicine

  2023cites this paper
• Post hoc subgroup analysis and identification—learning more from existing data

  2023cites this paper
• Estimation of a treatment effect based on a modified covariates method with L0 norm

  2023cites this paper
• A flexible approach for predictive biomarker discovery.

  2022cites this paper
• Impact of salvage radiotherapy on survival of patients with advanced locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Derivation and validation of a predictive model.

  2022cites this paper
• Radial Data Mining to Identify Density–Dose Interactions That Predict Distant Failure Following SABR

  2022cites this paper
• ScholarWorks@UTEP Refined Moderation Analysis with Binary Outcomes Refined Moderation Analysis with Binary Outcomes REFINED MODERATION ANALYSIS WITH BINARY OUTCOMES Proposed Method (Refined Moderation Analysis with Binary Outcomes) An Illustrative Example using the Wart dataset

  2021cites this paper
• Individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant‐level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning

  2020cites this paper
• A sparse additive model for treatment effect-modifier selection.

  2020cites this paper
• A constrained sparse additive model for treatment effect-modifier selection

  2020cites this paper
• A Simulation Study Comparing Different Statistical Approaches for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers

  2019cites this paper
• Confidence interval estimation for the changepoint of treatment stratification in the presence of a qualitative covariate‐treatment interaction

  2019cites this paper
• BREAST CANCER THERAPY

  2019cites this paper
• Probability of cancer in lung nodules using sequential volumetric screening up to 12 months: the UKLS trial

  2019cites this paper
• Stratified treatment recommendation or one-size-fits-all? A health economic insight based on graphical exploration

  2018cites this paper
• A simulation study on estimating biomarker–treatment interaction effects in randomized trials with prognostic variables

  2018cites this paper
• Long-term prognostic and predictive factors in hormone receptor positive breast cancer

  2018cites this paper
• Cardiovascular risk factors for perioperative myocardial injury

  2018cites this paper
• Flexible Regression Models for Estimating Interactions between a Treatment and Scalar/Functional Predictors

  2018cites this paper
• Impact of hormone receptor status and distant recurrence-free interval on survival benefits from trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

  2017cites this paper
• Graphical Presentation of Patient-Treatment Interaction Elucidated by Continuous Biomarkers

  2016cites this paper
• Towards optimal decision making in personalized medicine: Potential value assessment of biomarkers in heart failure exemplars

  2016cites this paper
• Relative efficacy of different types of exercise for treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis: protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  2016cites this paper
• Preoperative heart rate and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: results of a predefined secondary analysis of the VISION study

  2016cites this paper
• Evaluation ofAlcohol-Related Personalized Normative FeedbackWith andWithout an Injunctive Message

  2016cites this paper
• Evaluation of Alcohol-Related Personalized Normative Feedback With and Without an Injunctive Message.

  2016cites this paper
• ER and HER 2 expression are positively correlated in HER 2 non-overexpressing breast cancer

  2016cites this paper
• Identification of biomarker‐by‐treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes and high‐dimensional spaces

  2016cites this paper
• $\mathtt {Deepr}$: A Convolutional Net for Medical Records

  2016cites this paper
• University of Groningen Towards optimal decision making in personalized medicine

  2016cites this paper
• Multi-state relative survival modelling of colorectal cancer progression and mortality.

  2015cites this paper
• Understanding heterogeneity of treatment effect in prostate cancer

  2015cites this paper
• Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for generalized linear models

  2014cites this paper
• Prognostic impact of baseline serum C‐reactive protein in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with sunitinib

  2014cites this paper
• Investigation of continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP in patients requiring mechanical ventilation - protocol of the ICEM study

  2014cites this paper
• Interaction of treatment with a continuous variable: simulation study of significance level for several methods of analysis

  2013cites this paper
• Sample size and threshold estimation for clinical trials with predictive biomarkers.

  2013influential citation
• Trial Steering Committee

  2013cites this paper
• Partition Models for Variable Selection and Interaction Detection

  2013cites this paper
• Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration

  2012cites this paper
• Prognostic Factor Studies

  2012cites this paper
• Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration

  2012cites this paper
• A Simple Method for Detecting Interactions between a Treatment and a Large Number of Covariates

  2012cites this paper
• Quantum dots-based molecular classification of breast cancer by quantitative spectroanalysis of hormone receptors and HER2.

  2011cites this paper
• Treatment Interactions with Nonexperimental Data in Stata

  2010cites this paper
• ER and HER2 expression are positively correlated in HER2 non-overexpressing breast cancer

  2009cites this paper
• [Individualizing treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer].

  2009cites this paper
• Therapie beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom

  2009cites this paper
• Another STEPP in the right direction.

  2008cites this paper
• Towards optimal decision making in personalized medicine

  year unknowncites this paper
• References

  year unknowncites this paper