Minimal model estimate of glucose effectiveness: role of the minimal model volume and of the second hidden compartment.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1998

• Venue

  American Journal of Physiology

• Publication date

  1998-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Chemistry

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1152/ajpendo.1998.274.3.E573PMID 9530143
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Impaired Basal Glucose Effectiveness in NIDDM: Contribution of Defects in Glucose Disappearance and Production, Measured Using an Optimized Minimal Model Independent Protocol

  1997cited by this paper
• Role of Glucose Effectiveness in the Determination of Glucose Tolerance

  1996cited by this paper
• Is the minimal model too minimal?

  1996cited by this paper
• A Comparison Between the Minimal Model and the Glucose Clamp in the Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity Across the Spectrum of Glucose Tolerance

  1994cited by this paper
• Non-Insulin-Mediated Glucose Disappearance in Subjects With IDDM: Discordance Between Experimental Results and Minimal Model Analysis

  1994cited by this paper
• A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

  1994cited by this paper
• Minimal Models of Glucose Disappearance: Lessons from the Labelled IVGTT

  1991cited by this paper
• Equivalence of the insulin sensitivity index in man derived by the minimal model method and the euglycemic glucose clamp.

  1987cited by this paper
• Importance of Glucose Per Se to Intravenous Glucose Tolerance: Comparison of the Minimal-Model Prediction with Direct Measurements

  1985cited by this paper
• Measurement of size and turnover rate of body glucose pool by the isotope dilution method.

  1956cited by this paper

• model improved accuracy by a Bayesian two-compartment underestimation: I overestimation and S G Minimal model S

  2016cites this paper
• two-compartment model underestimation: improved accuracy by a Bayesian I overestimation and S G Minimal model S

  2011cites this paper
• in presence of insulin response is due to undermodeling Overestimation of minimal model glucose effectiveness

  2011cites this paper
• from a two-compartment model Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights

  2011cites this paper
• Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity measurements derived from the non‐insulin‐assisted minimal model and the clamp techniques are concordant

  2010influential citation
• A computational model of the human glucose-insulin regulatory system

  2010cites this paper
• A perturbation-based estimate algorithm for parameters of coupled ordinary differential equations, applications from chemical reactions to metabolic dynamics

  2009cites this paper
• THE IMPORTANCE OF DETERMINING THE PRESENCE AND DEGREE OF INSULIN RESISTANCE IN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND IN SOME CLINICAL STATES

  2005cites this paper
• Dijagnoza metaboličke inzulinske rezistencije Diagnosis of the Metabolic Insulin Resistance

  2005cites this paper
• Mathematical modeling in glucose metabolism and insulin secretion

  2002cites this paper
• AENDO June 39/6

  1999cites this paper
• Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model.

  1999cites this paper
• Minimal model SGoverestimation and SIunderestimation: improved accuracy by a Bayesian two-compartment model.

  1999cites this paper
• Minimal model SG overestimation and SI underestimation: improved accuracy by a Bayesian two-compartment model.

  1999cites this paper
• Undermodeling affects minimal model indexes: insights from a two-compartment model.

  1999cites this paper
• Overestimation of minimal model glucose effectiveness in presence of insulin response is due to undermodeling.

  1998cites this paper
• Overestimation of minimal model glucose effectiveness in presence of insulin response is due to undermodeling.

  1998cites this paper