Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Experimental Brain Research

• Publication date

  2017-04-24

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00221-017-4961-0PMID 28439628
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm

  2016cited by this paper
• Proactive inhibitory control: A general biasing account

  2016cited by this paper
• Poor stimulus discriminability as a common neuropsychological deficit between ADHD and reading ability in young children: a moderated mediation model

  2016cited by this paper
• Strategic down‐regulation of attentional resources as a mechanism of proactive response inhibition

  2016cited by this paper
• Evidence for capacity sharing when stopping

  2015cited by this paper
• Both the COMT Val158Met single-nucleotide polymorphism and sex-dependent differences influence response inhibition

  2015cited by this paper
• Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.

  2015cited by this paper
• Proactive and Reactive Stopping When Distracted: An Attentional Account

  2014cited by this paper
• Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change

  2014cited by this paper
• Fictitious Inhibitory Differences How Skewness and Slowing Distort the Estimation of Stopping Latencies

  2013influential reference
• Specificity of basic information processing and inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

  2013cited by this paper
• Fictitious Inhibitory Differences

  2013cited by this paper
• Proactive and reactive control of movement are differently affected in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder children.

  2013cited by this paper
• Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.

  2013cited by this paper
• The Countermanding Task Revisited: Fast Stimulus Detection Is a Key Determinant of Psychophysical Performance

  2013cited by this paper
• Spatial Frequency Information Modulates Response Inhibition and Decision-Making Processes

  2013cited by this paper
• Stop-signal response inhibition in schizophrenia: behavioural, event-related potential and functional neuroimaging data.

  2012cited by this paper
• Proactive inhibitory control varies with task context

  2012cited by this paper
• Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.

  2012cited by this paper
• Controlled movement processing: evidence for a common inhibitory control of finger, wrist, and arm movements.

  2012cited by this paper
• Neural Basis of Adaptive Response Time Adjustment during Saccade Countermanding

  2011cited by this paper
• Balancing cognitive demands: control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm.

  2011cited by this paper
• Response inhibition and response monitoring in a saccadic countermanding task in schizophrenia.

  2011cited by this paper
• Testing theories of post-error slowing

  2011cited by this paper
• Neural correlates of cognitive control of reaching movements in the dorsal premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys.

  2011cited by this paper
• Balancing Cognitive Demands: Control Adjustments in the Stop-signal Paradigm Stop-signal Paradigm Post-stop-signal Slowing

  2011cited by this paper
• Nonindependent and nonstationary response times in stopping and stepping saccade tasks

  2010cited by this paper
• Inhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task

  2010cited by this paper
• Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

  2009influential reference
• Post-error slowing: an orienting account.

  2009cited by this paper
• Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses

  2009influential reference
• Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task.

  2009cited by this paper
• Looking before you leap: A theory of motivated control of action

  2009cited by this paper
• Stop task after-effects: the extent of slowing during the preparation and execution of movement.

  2009cited by this paper
• A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task.

  2009cited by this paper
• Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans

  2009influential reference
• Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

  2009cited by this paper
• Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

  2008influential reference
• Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements

  2008cited by this paper
• Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments?

  2008cited by this paper
• Short-term Aftereffects of Response Inhibition: Repetition Priming or Between-trial Control Adjustments? the Stop-signal Paradigm

  2008cited by this paper
• The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process

  2008influential reference
• Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.

  2007cited by this paper
• Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex.

  2007cited by this paper
• Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys.

  2007influential reference
• G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

  2007influential reference
• Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque.

  2007cited by this paper
• Fixation offset and stop signal intensity effects on saccadic countermanding: a crossmodal investigation

  2006cited by this paper
• Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans

  2006cited by this paper
• Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.

  2005cited by this paper
• The neuropsychology of obsessive compulsive disorder: the importance of failures in cognitive and behavioural inhibition as candidate endophenotypic markers.

  2005cited by this paper
• Disentangling deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

  2005cited by this paper
• The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task.

  2004cited by this paper
• Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease

  2004cited by this paper
• Evidence for an Error Monitoring Deficit in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

  2004cited by this paper
• Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm.

  2004cited by this paper
• Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure.

  2003cited by this paper
• Inhibitory control of eye movements during oculomotor countermanding in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

  2003cited by this paper
• Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals.

  2001cited by this paper
• Redundancy gain in the stop-signal paradigm: implications for the locus of coactivation in simple reaction time.

  2001cited by this paper
• Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

  2001cited by this paper
• Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals

  2000cited by this paper
• Inhibitory after‐effects in the stop signal paradigm

  1999influential reference
• Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: a meta-analysis of studies with the stop task.

  1998cited by this paper
• Does motor programming necessitate response execution?

  1990cited by this paper
• The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation.

  1986cited by this paper
• On the ability to inhibit thought and action

  1984influential reference
• The Relation between Physical Stimulus Properties and the Effect of Foreperiod Duration on Reaction Time

  1973cited by this paper

• Inhibition of return emerges with non-predictive spatial cueing of the stop-signal

  2025cites this paper
• The difficulty in numerical computation impacts motor decisions in a Stop Signal task

  2025cites this paper
• Attentional spatial cueing of the stop-signal affects the ability to suppress behavioural responses

  2024cites this paper
• On the (un)reliability of common behavioral and electrophysiological measures from the stop signal task: Measures of inhibition lack stability over time.

  2024cites this paper
• Restart errors reaction time of a two-step inhibition process account for the violation of the race model’s independence in multi-effector selective stop signal task

  2023cites this paper
• Reward prospect affects strategic adjustments in stop signal task

  2023cites this paper
• Reply to: Hannah et al. (2021) Commentary: 'Does action-stopping involve separate pause and cancel processes? A view from premotor cortex': Action-stopping models must consider the role of the dorsal premotor cortex.

  2022cites this paper
• Individual differences in the effects of salience and reward on impulse control and action selection

  2022cites this paper
• Response Preparation Affects Cognitive Motor Control

  2022cites this paper
• How salience enhances inhibitory control: An analysis of electro-cortical mechanisms

  2022cites this paper
• Hold your horses: Differences in EEG correlates of inhibition in cancelling and stopping an action.

  2021cites this paper
• Color‐hierarchies in executive control of monkeys' behavior

  2021cites this paper
• When two is worse than one: The deleterious impact of multisensory stimulation on response inhibition

  2021cites this paper
• Response Inhibitory Control Varies with Different Sensory Modalities.

  2021cites this paper
• Cortical sensorimotor activity in the execution and suppression of discrete and rhythmic movements

  2021cites this paper
• tDCS over the inferior frontal gyri and visual cortices did not improve response inhibition

  2020cites this paper
• Models of making choice and control over thought for action

  2020cites this paper
• Stimulating stopping? Investigating the effects of tDCS over the inferior frontal gyri and visual cortices

  2019cites this paper
• The Puzzling Relationship between Attention and Motivation: Do Motor Biases Matter?

  2019cites this paper
• Neuronal Activity in the Premotor Cortex of Monkeys Reflects Both Cue Salience and Motivation for Action Generation and Inhibition

  2019cites this paper
• Visual salience of the stop signal affects the neuronal dynamics of controlled inhibition

  2018cites this paper
• Visual salience of the stop-signal affects neural dynamics of controlled inhibition

  2018cites this paper
• Detectability of stop‐signal determines magnitude of deceleration in saccade planning

  2018cites this paper
• Atrophic degeneration of cerebellum impairs both the reactive and the proactive control of movement in the stop signal paradigm

  2017cites this paper