Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research‐implementation gap and compromises in decision making

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Conservation Biology

• Publication date

  2018-02-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Business, Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/cobi.13054PMID 29139572
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Navigating the Space between Research and Implementation in Conservation

  2017influential reference
• Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.

  2014cited by this paper
• The effect of scientific evidence on conservation practitioners’ management decisions

  2014cited by this paper
• EDITORIAL: Bridging the knowing–doing gap: know‐who, know‐what, know‐why, know‐how and know‐when

  2014cited by this paper
• Conservation in a Wicked Complex World; Challenges and Solutions

  2014cited by this paper
• Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another

  2014cited by this paper
• Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting

  2013influential reference
• Use of Inverse Spatial Conservation Prioritization to Avoid Biological Diversity Loss Outside Protected Areas

  2013influential reference
• Getting the message across biodiversity science and policy interfaces: A review

  2012cited by this paper
• Walking in STEP: Lessons for linking spatial prioritisations to implementation strategies

  2011cited by this paper
• Buried by bad decisions

  2011cited by this paper
• Acknowledging Conservation Trade‐Offs and Embracing Complexity

  2010cited by this paper
• Birds and people both depend on China's wetlands

  2009cited by this paper
• Opportunism, Threats, and the Evolution of Systematic Conservation Planning

  2008cited by this paper
• Knowing But Not Doing: Selecting Priority Conservation Areas and the Research–Implementation Gap

  2008cited by this paper
• Science‐Driven Restoration: A Square Grid on a Round Earth?

  2007cited by this paper
• Embracing Opportunism in the Selection of Priority Conservation Areas

  2007cited by this paper
• Science Driven Restoration: A Candle in a Demon Haunted World—Response to Cabin (2007)

  2007cited by this paper
• Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.

  2006cited by this paper
• Failing but Learning: Writing the Wrongs after Redford and Taber

  2006cited by this paper
• An Operational Model for Implementing Conservation Action

  2006cited by this paper
• Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning

  2006cited by this paper
• Writing the Wrongs: Developing a Safe‐Fail Culture in Conservation

  2000cited by this paper
• War and Peace and Conservation Biology

  2000cited by this paper
• Systematic conservation planning

  2000cited by this paper

• Increasing the credibility of conservation plans through citizen science

  2026cites this paper
• Effective conservation action: Evaluating the implementation of the Core Flora Sites, a systematic conservation plan

  2025cites this paper
• Applied Solutions to Balance Conservation Need With Practical Applications: A Case Study With Eagles Movement Models and Wind Energy Development

  2025cites this paper
• Lack of spatial coordinate information for an important insect order (Lepidoptera) in a Central European country

  2025cites this paper
• Advancing at‐risk species recovery planning in an era of rapid ecological change with a transparent, flexible, and expert‐engaged approach

  2024influential citation
• A methodological procedure for the estimation of ecological value applied to a neotropical cloud forest

  2024cites this paper
• A systematic review on the definition, criteria, indicators, methods and applications behind the Ecological Value term

  2021cites this paper
• Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners’ preferences in boreal mire protection

  2021cites this paper
• Bridging the knowledge‐implementation gap between agency and academia: A case study of a graduate research experience

  2020cites this paper
• Combining spatial prioritization and expert knowledge facilitates effectiveness of large-scale mire protection process in Finland

  2020cites this paper
• Implementation strategies for systematic conservation planning

  2018cites this paper
• Strengthening the contribution of macroecological models to conservation practice

  2018cites this paper
• Evaluation, Gap Analysis, and Potential Expansion of the Finnish Marine Protected Area Network

  2018cites this paper