Beware the creeping cracks of bias

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Nature

• Publication date

  2012-05-09

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Economics, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/485149aPMID 22575922
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

  2012cited by this paper
• Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

  2005cited by this paper

• A Subjective and Intuitive Approach to Rapid, Holistic Assessment of Natural Ecosystem Integrity Across a Community‐Managed Conservation Area in Southern Tanzania

  2025cites this paper
• Can AI help authors prepare better risk science manuscripts?

  2025cites this paper
• Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of the Ifakara-Lupiro-Mang’ula Wildlife Management Area in Southern Tanzania

  2025cites this paper
• Community end user perceptions of hessian fabric transfluthrin vapour emanators for protecting against mosquitoes under conditions of routine use in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

  2024cites this paper
• GLP-1R agonists demonstrate potential to treat Wolfram syndrome in human preclinical models

  2023cites this paper
• Reliability of a Meta-analysis of Air Quality−Asthma Cohort Studies

  2022influential citation
• NIH Policies and Regulatory Pathways to U.S. FDA licensure: Strategies to Inform Advancement of Radiation Medical Countermeasures and Biodosimetry Devices

  2022cites this paper
• Statistical Reliability of a Diet-Disease Association Meta-analysis

  2022cites this paper
• A clinician’s guide to understanding and critically appraising machine learning studies: a checklist for Ruling Out Bias Using Standard Tools in Machine Learning (ROBUST-ML)

  2022cites this paper
• Do Registered Reports Make Scientific Findings More Believable to the Public?

  2022cites this paper
• Distinctions between Scientific Misconduct and Bias in Social Science: Avoidable versus Unavoidable Deviations from Best Practices in Research

  2021cites this paper
• Fooling ourselves and others: confirmation bias and the trustworthiness of qualitative research – Part 1 (the threats)

  2021cites this paper
• Confirmation bias and methodology in social science: an editorial

  2021cites this paper
• Evaluation of a meta-analysis of the association between red and processed meat and selected human health effects

  2021cites this paper
• Reliability of meta-analysis of an association between ambient air quality and development of asthma later in life

  2020cites this paper
• Evaluation of a Meta-Analysis of Ambient Air Quality as a Risk Factor for Asthma Exacerbation

  2020cites this paper
• Causal vs. Spurious Spatial Exposure-Response Associations in Health Risk Analysis

  2020cites this paper
• Have Decreases in Air Pollution Reduced Mortality Risks in the United States?

  2020cites this paper
• Improving Causal Determination

  2019cites this paper
• Evaluation of a meta-analysis of air quality and heart attacks, a case study

  2019cites this paper
• Perception and Proof

  2018cites this paper
• Evaluation Analytics for Public Health: Has Reducing Air Pollution Reduced Death Rates in the United States?

  2018cites this paper
• Pathological Reasoning Within Sciences

  2018cites this paper
• Improving Individual, Group, and Organizational Decisions: Overcoming Learning Aversion in Evaluating and Managing Uncertain Risks

  2018cites this paper
• Evolution of 21st Century Sea Level Rise Projections

  2018cites this paper
• Expanding our perspectives on research in musculoskeletal science and practice.

  2017cites this paper
• Recherche biomédicale et journalisme en situation d'incertitude : validité des résultats de la recherche biomédicale et couverture médiatique

  2017influential citation
• Indirect evidence of reporting biases was found in a survey of medical research studies.

  2017cites this paper
• Core Ethics for Health Professionals

  2017cites this paper
• Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers

  2017cites this paper
• Outlook for the Future

  2017cites this paper
• Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science

  2017cites this paper
• Experimental Design for Laboratory Biologists: Maximising Information and Improving Reproducibility. By Stanley E. Lazic. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. $175.00 (hardcover); $64.99 (paper). xv + 412 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-1-107-07429-3 (hc); 978-1-107-42488-3 (pb); 978-1-316

  2017cites this paper
• Replication Validity of Initial Association Studies: A Comparison between Psychiatry, Neurology and Four Somatic Diseases

  2016cites this paper
• Correcting the "self-correcting" mythos of science

  2015cites this paper
• Top-predator control-induced trophic cascades: an alternative hypothesis to the conclusion of Colman et al.

  2015cites this paper
• Has reducing fine particulate matter and ozone caused reduced mortality rates in the United States?

  2015cites this paper
• Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty about Causality in Improving Public Health and Safety

  2015cites this paper
• Overcoming Learning Aversion in Evaluating and Managing Uncertain Risks

  2015cites this paper
• Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.

  2015cites this paper
• Sarantakos's Research on Same-Sex Parenting in Australia and New Zealand: Importance, Substance, and Corroboration with Research from the United States1:

  2015cites this paper
• Scientific integrity and the market for lemons

  2014cites this paper
• Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics

  2014cites this paper
• The influence of sampling design on tree‐ring‐based quantification of forest growth

  2014cites this paper
• Science Perspectives on Psychological

  2014cites this paper
• 1 Yeast as a Model for Systems Biology Studies on Complex Diseases

  2014cites this paper
• Top-predator controlinduced controlinduced controlinduced trophic cascades : an alternative hypothesis to the conclusion of Colman et al

  2014cites this paper
• Environmental Risk Assessors as Honest Brokers or Stealth Advocates

  2014cites this paper
• Data Management in Astrobiology: Challenges and Opportunities for an Interdisciplinary Community

  2014cites this paper
• Review of Making Markets Work for the Poor (M4P) Evaluation Methods and Approaches

  2013cites this paper
• Biosafety Data as Confidential Business Information

  2013cites this paper
• We are not Born Knowing how to Design and Analyse Scientific Experiments

  2013cites this paper
• Temperature, not Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5), is Causally Associated with Short-Term Acute Daily Mortality Rates: Results from One Hundred United States Cities

  2013cites this paper
• Causal versus spurious spatial exposure–response associations in health risk analysis

  2013cites this paper
• Improving Causal Inferences in Risk Analysis

  2013cites this paper
• OF M 4 P EVALUATION METHODS AND APPROACHES

  2013cites this paper
• When money talks.

  2013cites this paper
• The decline and fall of the IGF‐I receptor

  2013cites this paper
• How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?

  2013cites this paper
• As clear as mud: A critical review of evidence for the ecological roles of Australian dingoes

  2013cites this paper
• Ecological periodic tables: in principle and practice

  2013cites this paper
• Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank

  2013cites this paper
• Learning about Champions — Individuals Catalysing Social Change

  2013cites this paper
• Perspectives When money talks

  2013cites this paper
• Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions

  2013cites this paper
• RUNNING HEAD: How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology?

  2013cites this paper
• Improving basic and translational science by accounting for litter-to-litter variation in animal models

  2012cites this paper
• Causality for Risk Analysts: Improving Our Understanding of How the World Works

  2012cites this paper
• Enfoques modernos del sesgo y la causalidad en la investigación epidemiológica

  2012cites this paper
• Strengthening statistical usage in marine ecology

  2012influential citation
• Quality and honesty in publications vs quantity

  2012cites this paper
• UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Bayesian model selection with applications in social science

  2012influential citation
• Childhood Disorders of the Synapse: Challenges and Opportunities

  2012cites this paper
• Dyssynchrony measurements to predict functional recovery after CRT: too good to be true?

  2012cites this paper
• Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science

  2012cites this paper
• Ocean viruses: rigorously evaluating the metagenomic sample-to-sequence pipeline.

  2012cites this paper
• In press for Perspectives on Psychological Science dummy text An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research

  2012cites this paper
• Promising outcomes of an online course in research writing at a Rwandan university

  2012cites this paper
• An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research

  2012cites this paper
• Undermine Science Science or Art ? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but

  2012cites this paper
• Modelling Epistemic Systems

  2012cites this paper
• Running Head : Consequences of Journal Rank Deep Impact : Unintended consequences of journal rank

  year unknowncites this paper
• Science Perspectives on Psychological an Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science

  year unknowncites this paper