Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Medical Physics (Lancaster)

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1118/1.4812681PMID 23927321
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.

  2013cited by this paper
• The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography.

  2012cited by this paper
• Including the effect of motion artifacts in noise and performance analysis of dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography

  2012cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study

  2012cited by this paper
• Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI?

  2012cited by this paper
• Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies.

  2012cited by this paper
• Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT.

  2012cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results

  2011cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality

  2011cited by this paper
• Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

  2011cited by this paper
• Single-layer and dual-layer contrast-enhanced mammography using amorphous selenium flat panel detectors

  2011cited by this paper
• Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

  2011cited by this paper
• On the orientation of mammographic structure.

  2011cited by this paper
• Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a photon-counting detector.

  2010cited by this paper
• Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms

  2010cited by this paper
• Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT.

  2010cited by this paper
• The myth of the 50-50 breast.

  2009cited by this paper
• Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images.

  2009cited by this paper
• Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies

  2009cited by this paper
• Dynamic functional and mechanical response of breast tissue to compression.

  2008cited by this paper
• Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images.

  2008cited by this paper
• Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging.

  2008cited by this paper
• Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.

  2008cited by this paper
• Signal detection in power-law noise: effect of spectrum exponents.

  2007cited by this paper
• Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

  2006cited by this paper
• Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.

  2006cited by this paper
• Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.

  2005cited by this paper
• Digital Mammography Using Iodine-Based Contrast Media: Initial Clinical Experience With Dynamic Contrast Medium Enhancement

  2005cited by this paper
• Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.

  2005cited by this paper
• Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities.

  2003cited by this paper
• Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

  2003cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.

  2003cited by this paper
• A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis.

  2002cited by this paper
• Hepatic and vascular enhancement at dual-phase helical CT: comparison of Iobitridol 300 and Iohexol 300 in a prospective randomized study

  2001cited by this paper
• Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

  2001cited by this paper
• Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results.

  2000cited by this paper
• Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

  1999cited by this paper
• A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.

  1998cited by this paper
• Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.

  1997cited by this paper
• Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis.

  1990cited by this paper
• X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues.

  1987cited by this paper
• Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.

  1985cited by this paper
• Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography.

  1981cited by this paper
• A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography.

  1981cited by this paper
• Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography

  1976cited by this paper

• A novel direct‐indirect dual‐layer flat‐panel detector for contrast‐enhanced breast imaging: Experimental assessment

  2025cites this paper
• A novel direct‐indirect dual‐layer flat‐panel detector for contrast‐enhanced breast imaging: Monte Carlo simulation

  2025cites this paper
• Scatter correction for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis with a dual-layer detector

  2024cites this paper
• Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: II. Artefacts/uniformity, exposure time and phantom-based dosimetry

  2023cites this paper
• Angiomammographie : technique

  2023cites this paper
• An anatomic clutter phantom for lung-ventilation-imaging studies

  2023cites this paper
• Monte-Carlo study of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors.

  2023cites this paper
• An initial experience of using dual energy contrast enhanced mammography at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

  2023cites this paper
• A homemade phantom for image quality evaluation in contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)

  2022cites this paper
• Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast mass lesions

  2021cites this paper
• Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors.

  2021cites this paper
• Mammographic image quality assessment by a contrast-to-noise ratio for clinical images

  2020cites this paper
• Cascaded systems analysis of anatomic noise in digital mammography and dual-energy digital mammography

  2019cites this paper
• Hyperspectral x-ray imaging : a comparison of iodinated and gold nanoparticle contrast media for the application of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

  2019cites this paper
• Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment

  2019cites this paper
• Physics of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

  2019cites this paper
• Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): a systematic review

  2019cites this paper
• A linear systems approach to modeling anatomic noise in digital mammography

  2018cites this paper
• Development of an automated detection algorithm for patient motion blur in digital mammograms

  2018cites this paper
• High Energy Resolution Hyperspectral X-Ray Imaging for Low-Dose Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography

  2017cites this paper
• A novel method for quantification of beam's‐eye‐view tumor tracking performance

  2017cites this paper
• Optimization of contrast‐enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model

  2017cites this paper
• Investigation of x-ray spectra for iodinated contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT

  2017cites this paper
• Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x‐ray spectra

  2017cites this paper
• Challenges in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography interpretation: artefacts lexicon.

  2016cites this paper
• A novel approach to background subtraction in contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography with commercially available mammography devices: Noise minimization.

  2016cites this paper
• The effect of NPS calculation method on power-law coefficient estimation accuracy in breast texture modeling

  2015cites this paper
• Si-strip photon counting detectors for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography

  2015cites this paper
• Optimisation de l’angiomammographie et de l’angiotomosynthèse double-énergie

  2015cites this paper
• Assessment of mass detection performance in contrast enhanced digital mammography

  2015cites this paper
• Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts

  2015cites this paper
• A simple scatter correction method for dual energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis

  2014cites this paper
• Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols

  2014cites this paper
• Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and digital mammography in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast mass lesions malignant breast mass lesion

  year unknowncites this paper