Emerging modalities in breast cancer imaging.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America

• Publication date

  2014-10-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.soc.2014.07.005PMID 25246048
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

  2014cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013.

  2014cited by this paper
• Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

  2014cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis utilization in the United States: a survey of physician members of the Society of Breast Imaging.

  2014cited by this paper
• Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.

  2013cited by this paper
• Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.

  2013cited by this paper
• Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.

  2013cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

  2013cited by this paper
• Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?

  2013cited by this paper
• Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.

  2013cited by this paper
• Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

  2013cited by this paper
• Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies.

  2012cited by this paper
• Non-Gaussian statistical properties of breast images.

  2012cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.

  2012cited by this paper
• Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.

  2012cited by this paper
• Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study.

  2012cited by this paper
• Results of a multicenter patient registry to determine the clinical impact of breast-specific gamma imaging, a molecular breast imaging technique.

  2012cited by this paper
• One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis

  2012cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study

  2012cited by this paper
• Calcifications in the Breast and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

  2011cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results

  2011cited by this paper
• Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.

  2011cited by this paper
• Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm.

  2011cited by this paper
• Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG.

  2011cited by this paper
• Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.

  2010cited by this paper
• Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.

  2010cited by this paper
• Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

  2010cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.

  2010cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

  2009cited by this paper
• Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings

  2008cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study.

  2008cited by this paper
• Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

  2008cited by this paper
• Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.

  2008cited by this paper
• Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

  2008cited by this paper
• Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

  2008cited by this paper
• Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications.

  2007cited by this paper
• American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography

  2007cited by this paper
• Breast‐Specific Gamma Imaging with 99mTc‐Sestamibi and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer—A Comparative Study

  2007cited by this paper
• Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

  2007cited by this paper
• Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

  2006cited by this paper
• High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer

  2006cited by this paper
• Digital Mammography Using Iodine-Based Contrast Media: Initial Clinical Experience With Dynamic Contrast Medium Enhancement

  2005cited by this paper
• Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.

  2003cited by this paper
• Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

  2003cited by this paper
• Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

  2002cited by this paper
• Development of contrast digital mammography.

  2002cited by this paper
• Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

  2001cited by this paper
• Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.

  2001cited by this paper
• Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

  2000cited by this paper
• Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

  1997cited by this paper

• Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?

  2018cites this paper
• Three-Dimensional Local Energy-Based Shape Histogram ( 3 D-LESH )-Based Feature Extraction – A Novel Technique

  2017cites this paper
• Three-Dimensional Local Energy-Based Shape Histogram (3D-LESH): A Novel Feature Extraction Technique

  2017cites this paper
• Dedicated Breast CT: Screening Technique of the Future

  2016cites this paper
• Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

  2016cites this paper