Abstract This study aimed to compare the efficacy of thromboelastography (TEG) and conventional coagulation methods in predicting hemorrhage risk in patients with leukemia. A total of 226 patients diagnosed with leukemia were included and divided into bleeding and nonbleeding groups. All patients had their blood samples taken for TEG test to measure the reaction time (R time), alpha (&agr; angle), and maximum amplitude (MA) as well as measure platelet count (PLT), prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Patients were followed up for bleeding episodes. The multivariate analysis showed that PLT [odds ratio (OR) = 0.993] and MA (OR = 0.921) have better association with bleeding risk. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the combination of PLT and MA (AUC = 0.824) was better for hemorrhage risk prediction than PLT [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.730] and MA (AUC = 0.819) alone. The combination of TEG and conventional coagulation methods could help in assessing the risk of hemorrhage in patients with leukemia.
The role of thromboelastography in predicting hemorrhage risk in patients with leukemia
H. Bao,Jing Du,Bing-yu Chen,Ying Wang
Published 2018 in Medicine
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Medicine
- Publication date
2018-03-01
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-23 of 23 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-11 of 11 citing papers · Page 1 of 1