Act versus Impact: Conservatives and liberals exhibit different structural emphases in moral judgment

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Ratio

• Publication date

  2017-03-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Political Science, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/RATI.12162
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Reinforcement learning

  2019cited by this paper
• A deterministic worldview promotes approval of state paternalism

  2017cited by this paper
• When Does Model-Based Control Pay Off?

  2016cited by this paper
• of Experimental Psychology : General Inference of Trustworthiness From Intuitive Moral Judgments

  2016cited by this paper
• Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them

  2016cited by this paper
• Trait psychopathy and utilitarian moral judgement: The mediating role of action aversion

  2015influential reference
• Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking

  2014influential reference
• Evaluative focus: A dual-process view of moral judgment

  2014cited by this paper
• Retrospective revaluation in sequential decision making: a tale of two systems.

  2014cited by this paper
• Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm.

  2014influential reference
• Integrative Moral Judgment: Dissociating the Roles of the Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex

  2014cited by this paper
• Action, Outcome, and Value

  2013influential reference
• How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character

  2013cited by this paper
• Neural computations underlying arbitration between model-based and model-free learning.

  2013cited by this paper
• Working-memory capacity protects model-based learning from stress

  2013cited by this paper
• Models of morality

  2013cited by this paper
• Action , outcome and value 1 RUNNING HEAD : ACTION , OUTCOME AND VALUE Action , outcome and value : A dual-system framework for morality and more

  2013influential reference
• Aversive for Me, Wrong for You: First‐person Behavioral Aversions Underlie the Moral Condemnation of Harm

  2013influential reference
• The Curse of Planning : Dissecting Multiple Reinforcement-Learning Systems by Taxing the Central Executive

  2013cited by this paper
• Disruption of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Decreases Model-Based in Favor of Model-free Control in Humans

  2013cited by this paper
• Simulating murder: the aversion to harmful action.

  2012cited by this paper
• Judgment before principle: engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission.

  2012cited by this paper
• Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality

  2012cited by this paper
• Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment

  2012cited by this paper
• Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians

  2012cited by this paper
• “If You Love Me Keep My Commandments”: Religiosity Increases Preference for Rule-Based Moral Arguments

  2012influential reference
• Kinship on the Kibbutz: coresidence duration predicts altruism, personal sexual aversions and moral attitudes among communally reared peers

  2012cited by this paper
• The social psychology of morality : exploring the causes of good and evil

  2012cited by this paper
• Two Minds Vs. Two Philosophies: Mind Perception Defines Morality and Dissolves the Debate Between Deontology and Utilitarianism

  2012cited by this paper
• Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength

  2011cited by this paper
• Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults

  2011cited by this paper
• The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.

  2011cited by this paper
• Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude.

  2010cited by this paper
• States versus rewards: dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning.

  2010cited by this paper
• The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules

  2010cited by this paper
• Deontological Dissonance and the Consequentialist Crutch

  2010cited by this paper
• Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays.

  2009influential reference
• Pushing moral buttons: the interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment.

  2009cited by this paper
• Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations

  2009influential reference
• Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals

  2009influential reference
• Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients.

  2009cited by this paper
• Disgust and the moralization of purity.

  2009influential reference
• Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences

  2009cited by this paper
• The fragmented folk : More evidence of stable individual differences in moral judgments and folk intuitions

  2008cited by this paper
• Planet of the Durkheimians : Where Community , Authority , and Sacredness Are Foundations of Morality

  2008cited by this paper
• Who Shalt Not Kill? Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment

  2008cited by this paper
• Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.

  2008cited by this paper
• Reinforcement learning: the good, the bad and the ugly.

  2008cited by this paper
• The secret joke of Kant's soul.

  2008cited by this paper
• The cognitive neuroscience of motivation and learning

  2008cited by this paper
• Infection, Incest, and Iniquity: Investigating the Neural Correlates of Disgust and Morality

  2008cited by this paper
• The smart potential behind probability matching.

  2008cited by this paper
• Moral appraisals affect doing/allowing judgments.

  2008cited by this paper
• The Disgust Scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement.

  2007cited by this paper
• Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism

  2007cited by this paper
• Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements

  2007cited by this paper
• When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

  2007cited by this paper
• The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment

  2006cited by this paper
• The Religion Gap

  2006cited by this paper
• The Construction of Preference: The Affect Heuristic

  2006cited by this paper
• The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.

  2004cited by this paper
• Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas

  2003cited by this paper
• An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

  2001cited by this paper
• The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

  2001cited by this paper
• Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them

  2001cited by this paper
• Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-Pencil versus Behavioral Measures

  1999cited by this paper
• Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance, and other system justifying attitudes

  1999influential reference
• Reinforcement learning

  1998cited by this paper
• Regular ArticleProtected Values

  1997cited by this paper
• Protected Values

  1997cited by this paper
• Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors

  1994cited by this paper
• Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.

  1994cited by this paper
• An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics.

  1993cited by this paper
• Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?

  1993influential reference
• The efficient assessment of need for cognition.

  1984cited by this paper

• Moral Judgments of Discrimination: The Effects of Expressive and Deliberative Disrespect

  2026cites this paper
• Bidirectional interplay of disgust and morality: Meta-analytic investigations

  2025cites this paper
• Validation and adaptation of the moral outrage scale in the Peruvian adult population

  2024cites this paper
• Does Momentary Outcome-Based Reflection Shape Bioethical Views? A Pre-Post Intervention Design

  2024cites this paper
• Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses

  2024cites this paper
• The Moral Reasoning of Ideology: The Mediating Role of Moral Foundations, Moral Absolutism, and Consistency Norm

  2023cites this paper
• Beyond bidimensional measures: Introducing a culturally tailored measure of political orientation

  2023cites this paper
• FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO EXISTENCE OF UNETHICAL PRACTICES IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY

  2022cites this paper
• Big Five Personality Traits and Moral-Dilemma Judgments: Two Preregistered Studies Using the CNI Model

  2022cites this paper
• The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia

  2022cites this paper
• Do well, do good, and know your audience: the double-edged sword of values-based CSR communication

  2022cites this paper
• Psychological Aspects of Political Choices: Focus on Cognition, Decision-Making Styles, and Emotions in Voting Behaviour

  2022cites this paper
• Consequences, Norms, and General Action Tendencies: Understanding Individual Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments

  2022cites this paper
• A tale of two hashtags: An examination of moral content of pro‐ and anti‐government tweets in Turkey

  2021cites this paper
• Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model

  2021influential citation
• Absolutely Right and Relatively Good: Consequentialists See Bioethical Disagreement in a Relativist Light

  2021cites this paper
• Dynamic processes underlying individual differences in moral behavior

  2021cites this paper
• Trolleys, triage and Covid-19: the role of psychological realism in sacrificial dilemmas

  2021cites this paper
• Understanding the Psychological Perspective of Political Trust in Indonesia Context

  2021cites this paper
• Moral migration: Desires to become more empathic predict changes in moral foundations

  2020cites this paper
• Translation and validation of the Moral Foundations Vignettes (MFVs) for the Portuguese language in a Brazilian sample

  2020cites this paper
• Political Orientations and Morality Judgments in the Turkish Context: Considering the Roles of the Needs for Cognition and Recognition

  2020influential citation
• Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2020cites this paper
• Moral Values and Voting

  2020cites this paper
• Insight into Individuals' Reaction toward Information Security Breach

  2019cites this paper
• Rationalization and Reflection Differentially Modulate Prior Attitudes Toward the Purity Domain

  2019cites this paper
• The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system

  2019cites this paper
• Not Just Bad Actions: Affective Concern for Bad Outcomes Contributes to Moral Condemnation of Harm in Moral Dilemmas

  2018cites this paper
• Actions speak louder than outcomes in judgments of prosocial behavior.

  2018cites this paper
• Personality dynamics in the brain: Individual differences in updating of representations and their phylogenetic roots

  2018cites this paper
• Effect of the Contents in Advance Directives on Individuals’ Decision-Making

  2018cites this paper
• Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?

  2018cites this paper
• Factors That Influence Conservatism vs. Liberalism

  2018cites this paper
• Disgust and Deontology

  2017cites this paper
• Is the moral domain unique? A social influence perspective for the study of moral cognition

  2017cites this paper
• --forthcoming in Cognition-- Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible ?

  2017cites this paper
• Trait psychopathy and utilitarian moral judgement: The mediating role of action aversion

  2015cites this paper
• Moral-Dilemma Judgments

  year unknowncites this paper