Why are artificial polymorphous concepts so hard for birds to learn?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2006

• Venue

  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

• Publication date

  2006-02-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/02724990544000031PMID 16618633
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Capacity and limits of associative memory in pigeons

  2005cited by this paper
• The concept of mind.

  2004cited by this paper
• Pigeon's recognition of cartoons: effects of fragmentation, scrambling, and deletion of elements.

  2004cited by this paper
• Pigeons use item-specific and category-level information in the identification and categorization of human faces.

  2003cited by this paper
• Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons

  2003cited by this paper
• Target-defining features in a “people-present/people-absent” discrimination task by pigeons

  2002cited by this paper
• A hybrid model of categorization

  2001cited by this paper
• The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons

  2001cited by this paper
• Natural Categorization through Multiple Feature Learning in Pigeons

  2000cited by this paper
• Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli.

  1999cited by this paper
• Generic perception: open-ended categorization of natural classes

  1999influential reference
• Categorical Discrimination of Human Facial Expressions by Pigeons: A Test of the Linear Feature Model

  1997cited by this paper
• Book Review: Attention and Emotion: A Clinical Perspective

  1997cited by this paper
• A prototype effect and categorization of artificial polymorphous stimuli in pigeons.

  1996cited by this paper
• Categorization and sensitivity to correlation.

  1996cited by this paper
• Categorization of Prototypical Stimulus Classes by Pigeons

  1996cited by this paper
• Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination

  1996cited by this paper
• Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

  1994cited by this paper
• Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

  1994cited by this paper
• Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds.

  1994cited by this paper
• Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning.

  1993cited by this paper
• Discrimination of Five-Dimensional Stimuli by Pigeons: Limitations of Feature Analysis

  1993influential reference
• A Test of the Linear Feature Model of Polymorphous Concept Discrimination with Pigeons

  1993cited by this paper
• Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder

  1993cited by this paper
• Spatial and configural factors in compound stimulus processing by pigeons

  1992influential reference
• Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features.

  1990influential reference
• Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach.

  1990influential reference
• Partial reinforcement effects on discrimination learning

  1989cited by this paper
• Pigeon visual memory capacity.

  1984cited by this paper
• Discrimination of Polymorphous Stimulus Sets by Pigeons

  1978cited by this paper
• Natural concepts in pigeons.

  1976cited by this paper
• The role of test stimuli in matching to compound samples by pigeons

  1976cited by this paper
• Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories

  1975cited by this paper
• High-order concept formation in the pigeon.

  1974cited by this paper
• New Problem in Concept Formation

  1973influential reference
• A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement

  1972cited by this paper
• Recognition by the pigeon of stimuli varying in two dimensions.

  1972cited by this paper
• "Configural" conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing.

  1972cited by this paper
• A peak shift on a line-tilt continuum.

  1967cited by this paper
• Partial Reinforcement and Breadth of Learning

  1966cited by this paper
• Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon

  1964cited by this paper
• Learning and memorization of classifications.

  1961influential reference
• "Hypotheses" in rats.

  1932cited by this paper

• Visual categories and concepts in the avian brain

  2022cites this paper
• A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category learning

  2019cites this paper
• Multiple Feature Use in Pigeons’ Category Discrimination: The Influence of Stimulus Set Structure and the Salience of Stimulus Differences

  2018cites this paper
• Simultaneous Discrimination of Speed is More Difficult than Simultaneous Discrimination of Size for Both Pigeons and People

  2017cites this paper
• Categories and Concepts in Animals

  2016cites this paper
• The Ethology of Domestic Animals, 2nd Edition

  2015cites this paper
• Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons

  2014cites this paper
• Labelling and Family Resemblance in the 2 discrimination of polymorphous categories 3 by pigeons

  2013cites this paper
• Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

  2013cites this paper
• Interpreting the effects of image manipulation on picture perception in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

  2011cites this paper
• Labeling and family resemblance in the discrimination of polymorphous categories by pigeons

  2010cites this paper
• Comparative Vision Science: Seeing Eye to Eye?

  2010cites this paper
• Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: a common-elements model.

  2010cites this paper
• On Categories, Pictures, and the Goals of Comparative Psychology

  2010cites this paper
• What's the use of picture discrimination experiments?

  2010cites this paper
• A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).

  2009cites this paper
• A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia).

  2009cites this paper
• 1.11 – Categories and Concepts in Animals

  2008cites this paper
• Use of multiple dimensions in learned discriminations

  2008influential citation
• Revealing cognitive mechanisms in the pigeon brain

  2008cites this paper
• Adaptation by learning: its significance for farm animal husbandry

  2007cites this paper
• A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category learning learning

  year unknowncites this paper