Accurate prediction of interfacial residues in two‐domain proteins using evolutionary information: Implications for three‐dimensional modeling

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

• Publication date

  2014-07-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/prot.24486PMID 24375512
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER

  2016cited by this paper
• R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

  2014cited by this paper
• The RCSB Protein Data Bank: new resources for research and education

  2012cited by this paper
• Promiscuous domains: facilitating stability of the yeast protein-protein interaction network.

  2012cited by this paper
• Homology Modeling a Fast Tool for Drug Discovery: Current Perspectives

  2012cited by this paper
• Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013

  2012cited by this paper
• Prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces using a random forest model with hybrid features.

  2012cited by this paper
• Protein interface classification by evolutionary analysis

  2012cited by this paper
• Prediction of interacting protein residues using sequence and structure data.

  2012cited by this paper
• Amino acid coevolution induces an evolutionary Stokes shift

  2012cited by this paper
• Prescont: Predicting protein‐protein interfaces utilizing four residue properties

  2012cited by this paper
• Slow protein evolutionary rates are dictated by surface–core association

  2011cited by this paper
• Stability of domain structures in multi-domain proteins

  2011cited by this paper
• Tuning Protein Autoinhibition by Domain Destabilization

  2011cited by this paper
• HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment

  2011cited by this paper
• Proteins move! Protein dynamics and long-range allostery in cell signaling.

  2011cited by this paper
• The Pfam protein families database

  2011cited by this paper
• Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM

  2011cited by this paper
• A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution.

  2010cited by this paper
• iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein-protein interfaces

  2010cited by this paper
• Applying the Naïve Bayes classifier with kernel density estimation to the prediction of protein-protein interaction sites

  2010cited by this paper
• Protein interface conservation across structure space

  2010cited by this paper
• Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0

  2010cited by this paper
• Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level.

  2009cited by this paper
• Atomistic view of the conformational activation of Src kinase using the string method with swarms-of-trajectories.

  2009cited by this paper
• Structural assembly of two-domain proteins by rigid-body docking

  2008influential reference
• Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes.

  2008cited by this paper
• Src Kinase Conformational Activation: Thermodynamics, Pathways, and Mechanisms

  2008cited by this paper
• Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment

  2007cited by this paper
• The Pfam protein families database

  2007cited by this paper
• Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER

  2007cited by this paper
• Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation

  2007cited by this paper
• meta-PPISP: a meta web server for protein-protein interaction site prediction

  2007cited by this paper
• ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence

  2007cited by this paper
• Protein-Protein Binding-Sites Prediction by Protein Surface Structure Conservation

  2007cited by this paper
• Hot spots—A review of the protein–protein interface determinant amino‐acid residues

  2007cited by this paper
• The Many Faces of Protein–Protein Interactions: A Compendium of Interface Geometry

  2006cited by this paper
• Prediction of structures of multidomain proteins from structures of the individual domains

  2006influential reference
• Protein quality in bacterial inclusion bodies.

  2006cited by this paper
• A gold standard set of mechanistically diverse enzyme superfamilies

  2006cited by this paper
• Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast.

  2006cited by this paper
• Control of protein functional dynamics by peptide linkers.

  2005cited by this paper
• PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking

  2005cited by this paper
• Multi-domain proteins in the three kingdoms of life: orphan domains and other unassigned regions.

  2005cited by this paper
• CX, DPX and PRIDE: WWW servers for the analysis and comparison of protein 3D structures

  2005cited by this paper
• Interaction preferences across protein-protein interfaces of obligatory and non-obligatory components are different

  2005cited by this paper
• All are not equal: A benchmark of different homology modeling programs

  2005cited by this paper
• TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score

  2005cited by this paper
• The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces.

  2005cited by this paper
• Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach.

  2005cited by this paper
• A two-stage classifier for identification of protein-protein interface residues

  2004cited by this paper
• Structure, function and evolution of multidomain proteins.

  2004cited by this paper
• SUPFAM: A database of sequence superfamilies of protein domains

  2004cited by this paper
• Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior.

  2004cited by this paper
• Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces

  2003cited by this paper
• Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces.

  2003cited by this paper
• Class-Boundary Alignment for Imbalanced Dataset Learning

  2003cited by this paper
• LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures

  2003cited by this paper
• Intrinsically unstructured proteins.

  2002cited by this paper
• Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues

  2002cited by this paper
• Rosetta Stone proteins: "chance and necessity"?

  2002cited by this paper
• Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies.

  2001cited by this paper
• Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes.

  2001cited by this paper
• An insight into domain combinations

  2001cited by this paper
• Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures.

  2001cited by this paper
• Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases.

  2000cited by this paper
• Protein production: feeding the crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists

  2000influential reference
• Protein NMR spectroscopy in structural genomics

  2000cited by this paper
• Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases.

  2000cited by this paper
• Protein structure modeling for structural genomics

  2000cited by this paper
• Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

  1999cited by this paper
• Crystal structures of c-Src reveal features of its autoinhibitory mechanism.

  1999cited by this paper
• Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST--a tool for discovery in protein databases.

  1998cited by this paper
• Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

  1997cited by this paper
• An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families.

  1996cited by this paper
• Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments.

  1996cited by this paper
• SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures.

  1995cited by this paper
• CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.

  1994cited by this paper
• Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

  1993cited by this paper
• Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.

  1993cited by this paper
• The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins.

  1976cited by this paper
• Principles of protein–protein recognition

  1975cited by this paper

• Modified naive Bayes classifier for classification of protein-protein interaction sites

  2020cites this paper
• Specialized structural and functional roles of residues selectively conserved in subfamilies of the pleckstrin homology domain family

  2019cites this paper
• Domain architecture of BAF250a reveals the ARID and ARM-repeat domains with implication in function and assembly of the BAF remodeling complex

  2018cites this paper
• Computational modelling of multidomain proteins with covarying residue pairs

  2016cites this paper
• Prediction of protein–protein interaction sites by means of ensemble learning and weighted feature descriptor

  2016cites this paper
• Structural Modeling of GR Interactions with the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complex and C/EBP.

  2015cites this paper
• Advances in template-based protein docking by utilizing interfaces towards completing structural interactome.

  2015cites this paper
• An overview of recent advances in structural bioinformatics of protein-protein interactions and a guide to their principles.

  2014cites this paper