Revolutionizing peer review?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Nature Neuroscience

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Art, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/nn0405-397PMID 15795738
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Citation data: the wrong impact?

  1998cited by this paper
• The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.

  1998cited by this paper

• Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers

  2020cites this paper
• Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers

  2019cites this paper
• Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science

  2019cites this paper
• Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data

  2019cites this paper
• Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it?

  2018cites this paper
• Altmetric scores: An early indicator of research impact

  2018cites this paper
• Burdens Without Blessings: Peer Reviewers Get No Respect.

  2017cites this paper
• Burdens without blessings: Peer reviewers get no respect.

  2017cites this paper
• Ethics of reviewing scientific publications.

  2017cites this paper
• Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature

  2016cites this paper
• Using Altmetrics as an Engineering Faculty Outreach Tool

  2016cites this paper
• Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review

  2015cites this paper
• The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers

  2015cites this paper
• Annotating for the world: Attitudes toward sharing scholarly annotations

  2014cites this paper
• Conceptualising research quality in medicine for evaluative bibliometrics

  2013cites this paper
• F 1000 , Mendeley and Traditional Bibliometric Indicators

  2012cites this paper
• Post-publication review: Will it hold its ground?

  2012cites this paper
• Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review

  2011cites this paper
• Decoupling the scholarly journal

  2011cites this paper
• Four Draft Working Papers: PEER REVIEW IN ACADEMIC PROMOTION AND PUBLISHING: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future

  2010cites this paper
• Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: lessons from the Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project.

  2008cites this paper
• Analyzing the impact of an author's publications.

  2008cites this paper
• Soft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation

  2008cites this paper
• Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project

  2007cites this paper
• Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers

  2006cites this paper