Comparative impact of paraclinical studies in establishing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1989

• Venue

  Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

• Publication date

  1989-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90093-XPMID 2479522
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Magnetic resonance in multiple sclerosis

  2004cited by this paper
• SSEP and F‐wave studies in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

  1989cited by this paper
• Magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve in optic neuritis

  1988cited by this paper
• MRI in the diagnosis of MS

  1988cited by this paper
• Sample size for testing differences in proportions for the paired-sample design.

  1987cited by this paper
• Multiple sclerosis. The problem of incorrect diagnosis.

  1986cited by this paper
• Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study

  1986cited by this paper
• The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

  1986cited by this paper
• Verapamil-induced changes in central conduction in patients with multiple sclerosis.

  1985cited by this paper
• The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging

  1985cited by this paper
• Magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

  1985cited by this paper
• Value of multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria. 70 autopsy-confirmed cases.

  1985cited by this paper
• MR imaging of multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical and CT examinations in 74 patients.

  1985cited by this paper
• American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for clinical evoked potential studies.

  1984cited by this paper
• New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols

  1983cited by this paper
• Central and peripheral conduction times in multiple sclerosis.

  1980cited by this paper
• Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory, and short‐latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis

  1980cited by this paper
• STATISTICAL METHODS

  1967cited by this paper
• The morbid anatomy of the demyelinative disease.

  1952cited by this paper
• The morbid anatomy of the demyelinative diseases

  1952cited by this paper

• Chapter 25 – Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Pediatrics—Abnormal

  2006cites this paper
• VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL IN DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

  2005cites this paper
• Chapter 26 – Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Infants and Children

  2005cites this paper
• Long-latency Cerebral Event-related Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis

  2001cites this paper
• Visuell evozierte Potentiale (VEP)

  1999cites this paper
• A prospective study on the predictive value of CSF oligoclonal bands and MRI in acute isolated neurological syndromes for subsequent progression to multiple sclerosis.

  1996cites this paper
• The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor evoked potentials in the investigation of central motor pathways in multiple sclerosis.

  1996cites this paper
• The effect of spectrum bias on the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potentials in the diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis

  1996cites this paper
• Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.

  1995cites this paper
• Clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The impact of magnetic resonance imaging and ancillary testing. Rochester-Toronto Magnetic Resonance Study Group.

  1994cites this paper
• A randomized trial of test result sequencing in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group.

  1994cites this paper
• [Results of clinico-immunological testing of myelopid in chronic forms of multiple sclerosis].

  1992cites this paper
• Somatosensory evoked potential testing in infants and children.

  1992cites this paper
• The diagnostic reliability of magnetically evoked motor potentials in multiple sclerosis

  1992cites this paper
• The Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis

  1991cites this paper
• Sensory Evoked Potentials in Clinical Practice

  1990cites this paper