Ontario doctors' attitudes toward and use of clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

• Publication date

  2007-08-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2006.00670.XPMID 17683303
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology.

  2005cited by this paper
• International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument.

  2004cited by this paper
• Perspectives on the value of American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines as reported by oncologists and health maintenance organizations.

  2003cited by this paper
• Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review

  2002cited by this paper
• Practice guidelines: useful and "participative" method? Survey of Italian physicians by professional setting.

  2001cited by this paper
• What is the quality of drug therapy clinical practice guidelines in Canada?

  2001cited by this paper
• Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study

  2001cited by this paper
• Canadian Oncologists and Clinical Practice Guidelines: A National Survey of Attitudes and Reported Use

  2000cited by this paper
• Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms.

  2000cited by this paper
• Comparing physician and administrator responses to cesarean section guidelines and actual practice.

  2000cited by this paper
• Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.

  2000cited by this paper
• Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

  1999cited by this paper
• Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature.

  1999cited by this paper
• Attitudes of faculty, housestaff, and medical students toward clinical practice guidelines.

  1999cited by this paper
• The attitudes of Australian GPs to evidence-based medicine: a focus group study.

  1999cited by this paper
• [How have opinions of medical oncologists changed regarding compared guidelines? Findings from two surveys conducted in 1993-1997].

  1999cited by this paper
• Progress of clinical oncology guidelines development using the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle: the role of practitioner feedback.

  1998cited by this paper
• General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey

  1998cited by this paper
• Surgeons' opinions about the NHMRC clinical practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer

  1998cited by this paper
• Family physicians' attitudes about and use of clinical practice guidelines.

  1997cited by this paper
• Physicians' view of practice guidelines. A survey of Italian physicians.

  1996cited by this paper
• Credibility, Cookbook Medicine, and Common Sense: Guidelines and the College

  1994cited by this paper
• Internists' Attitudes about Clinical Practice Guidelines

  1994cited by this paper
• Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

  1993cited by this paper

• Utilization of clinical practice guidelines for cancer care in routine practice and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in India

  2024cites this paper
• Clinician attitudes towards cancer treatment guidelines in Australia

  2023cites this paper
• Physicians’ attitudes and perceived barriers to adherence to the national breast cancer clinical practice guidelines in Mexico: a survey study

  2022cites this paper
• Evaluation of the quality of published SCI clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument: Results from Can-SCIP expert panel

  2021cites this paper
• Clinicians’ attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol

  2020cites this paper
• Clinicians’ attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature

  2020influential citation
• Imaging for metastatic disease in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: are doctor's perceptions in keeping with the guidelines?

  2015cites this paper
• Intrapartum clinical guideline for monitoring and managing a woman during labour

  2014cites this paper
• Electronic Decision Support Systems for Prescribing: Challenges and Perspectives for Personalized Medicine

  2014cites this paper
• Implementationsforschung: Grundbegriffe und Konzepte

  2014cites this paper
• The impact of acute care clinical practice guidelines on length of stay: A closer look at some conflicting findings

  2014cites this paper
• Reasons for non-use of proven pharmacotherapeutic interventions: systematic review and framework development.

  2012cites this paper
• Target for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol)

  2011cites this paper
• Is There a Role for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Meetings? A Descriptive Study of Knowledge Transfer Between Research and Practice

  2011cites this paper
• Breast medical oncologists' use of standard prognostic factors to predict a 21-gene recurrence score.

  2011cites this paper
• Importance of adherence to guidelines in breast cancer clinical practice. The Italian experience (AIOM)

  2011cites this paper
• Importance of adherence to guidelines in breast cancer clinical practice. The Italian experience (AIOM).

  2011cites this paper
• Perceptions and attitudes of clinicians in Spain toward clinical practice guidelines and grading systems: a protocol for a qualitative study and a national survey

  2010cites this paper
• Radiation oncology.

  2010cites this paper
• Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

  2010cites this paper
• Examining the introduction of a supportive care screening and referral process for cancer patients: how does practice compare with protocols?

  2010influential citation
• Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?

  2010cites this paper
• Clinicians' evaluations of, endorsements of, and intentions to use practice guidelines change over time: a retrospective analysis from an organized guideline program

  2009cites this paper
• Medicine and evidence: knowledge and action in clinical practice.

  2007cites this paper