The Court of Life and Death: The Two Tracks of Constitutional Sentencing Law and the Case for Uniformity

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  Michigan Law Review

• Publication date

  2008-09-05

• Fields of study

  Law, Political Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Institutional Design and the Policing of Prosecutors: Lessons from Administrative Law

  2008cited by this paper
• From Lawlessness to Too Much Law? Exploring the Risk of Disparity from Differences in Defense Counsel Under Guidelines Sentencing

  2003cited by this paper
• Substance and Procedure in Capital Cases: Why Federal Habeas Courts Should Review the Merits of Every Death Sentence

  2000cited by this paper
• Let God Sort Them Out? Refining the Individualization Requirement in Capital Sentencing

  1992cited by this paper

• Global Surpluses of Extraction and Slow Climate Violence: A Sociological Framework

  2022cites this paper
• Eighth Amendment Values

  2020cites this paper
• Slow Law: Temporal Logics in US Death Penalty Mitigation Investigations

  2019cites this paper
• Normalizing extreme imprisonment: The case of life without parole in California (1972–2012)

  2019cites this paper
• Classical Liberal Criminal Law

  2018cites this paper
• How to End Mass Imprisonment: The Legal and Cultural Strategies of Bryan Stevenson

  2017cites this paper
• Cost and Access to Drug Treatment within the United States Prison System

  2017cites this paper
• A Power-Law Analysis of the Uneven Geographic Distribution of Executions in the Post-Furman Era of the Death Penalty

  2015cites this paper
• Sentenced to Life: Penal Reform and the Most Severe Sanctions

  2013cites this paper
• Law versus politics

  2013cites this paper
• The Study of Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions to the Eighth Amendment

  2012cites this paper
• Why Proportionality Matters

  2012cites this paper
• Can Criminal Law Be Controlled

  2010cites this paper
• The United States Supreme Court: Graham v. Florida & the Federal Court of Australia: Habib v. Australia

  2010cites this paper