Forty-five participants described and rated two events each week during their first term at university. After 3.5 years, we examined whether event characteristics rated in the diary predicted remembering, reliving, and life story importance at the follow-up. In addition, we examined whether ratings of life story importance were consistent across a three year interval. Approximately 60% of events were remembered, but only 20% of these were considered above medium importance to life stories. Higher unusualness, rehearsal, and planning predicted whether an event was remembered 3.5 years later. Higher goal-relevance, importance, emotional intensity, and planning predicted life story importance 3.5 years later. There was a moderate correlation between life story importance rated three months after the diary and rated at the 3.5 year follow-up. The results suggest that autobiographical memory and life stories are governed by different mechanisms and that life story memories are characterized by some degree of stability.
A 3.5 year diary study: Remembering and life story importance are predicted by different event characteristics.
D. Thomsen,T. Jensen,T. Holm,M. Olesen,Anette Schnieber,Jan Tønnesvang
Published 2015 in Consciousness and Cognition
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2015
- Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
- Publication date
2015-11-01
- Fields of study
Medicine, Education, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-56 of 56 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-24 of 24 citing papers · Page 1 of 1