An Assessment of the Use of a Structured, Subjective Method to Evaluate the Quality of Decisions in Complex, Ill-structured Problems

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2014-10-07

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Psychology

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A Framework for Management Information Systems

  2015cited by this paper
• Basic Topics and Approaches to the Study of Complex Problem Solving

  2014influential reference
• Decision Making I

  2014cited by this paper
• Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology Volume 30 ( 1 ) Winter / hiver 2004 Identifying and Measuring Ill-Structured Problem Formulation and Resolution in Online Asynchronous Discussions

  2013cited by this paper
• Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Repeated Causal Decision Making

  2012cited by this paper
• A multicriteria group decision-making approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: A comparative perspective

  2011cited by this paper
• Evaluation of Geospatial Digital Support Products

  2010cited by this paper
• Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition?

  2010influential reference
• You Cannot Have Your Cake and Eat It, too: How Induced Goal Conflicts Affect Complex Problem Solving

  2010cited by this paper
• Analysis of dependence of decision quality on data quality

  2008cited by this paper
• Working Paper Alfred P. Sloan School of Management Decomposition and the Control of Errors in Decision Analytic Models* Decomposition and the Control of Errors in Decision Analytic Models* Decomposition and the Control of Errors in Decision Analytic Models*

  2008cited by this paper
• Diagnosing decision quality

  2008cited by this paper
• The Decision-Making Process in a Complex Situation

  2008cited by this paper
• All Problems are not Equal: Implications for Problem-Based Learning

  2008cited by this paper
• Benefits of Decision Support Systems

  2008influential reference
• Jean Gourd Statement of Research

  2008cited by this paper
• EVALUATION OF ADVANCED AUTOMATED GEOSPATIAL TOOLS: AGILITY IN COMPLEX PLANNING

  2008cited by this paper
• Complex Problem Solving: Identity Matching Based on Social Contextual Information

  2007influential reference
• Decision Support for Individuals, Groups, and Organizations: Ethics and Values in the Context of Complex Problem Solving

  2007cited by this paper
• “Leaky” Rationality: How Research on Behavioral Decision Making Challenges Normative Standards of Rationality

  2007influential reference
• Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Report

  2006cited by this paper
• Evolution of the ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement’

  2006cited by this paper
• The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms

  2006cited by this paper
• An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Situation Awareness and Decision Making

  2005cited by this paper
• Complex problem-solving: a field in search of a definition?

  2005cited by this paper
• Accepting uncertainty, assessing risk: decision quality in managing wildfire, forest resource values, and new technology

  2005influential reference
• Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management

  2005influential reference
• FROM CHESS TO CHANCELLORSVILLE: MEASURING DECISION QUALITY IN MILITARY COMMANDERS Robert S. Bolia W. Todd Nelson Michael A. Vidulich Air Force Research Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH USA Robert M. Taylor Defence Science and Technology Laboratory Farnborough, Hants UK

  2005cited by this paper
• An Empirical Test of Cognitive Style and Strategic Decision Outcomes

  2005cited by this paper
• Pluralistic multi-agent decision support system: a framework and an empirical test

  2004cited by this paper
• DSS Effectiveness in Marketing Resource Allocation Decisions: Reality vs. Perception

  2004cited by this paper
• A multiple-criteria framework for evaluation of decision support systems

  2004cited by this paper
• Semantic Web Methodologies for Spatial Decision Support

  2004cited by this paper
• Evaluating expert-authored rules for military reasoning

  2003influential reference
• Hard decisions, bad decisions: On decision quality and decision aiding

  2003influential reference
• Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks

  2003influential reference
• Introduction: Where to decision making

  2003cited by this paper
• Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation

  2003cited by this paper
• On the Assessment of Decision Quality: Considerations Regarding Utility, Conflict and Accountability

  2003cited by this paper
• Evacuation planning and spatial decision making: designing effective spatial decision support systems through integration of technologies

  2002influential reference
• Using a spatial decision support system for solving the vehicle routing problem

  2002cited by this paper
• Supporting complex decisions for sustainable river management in England and Wales

  2002cited by this paper
• From human decision making to DMSS architecture

  2002cited by this paper
• Decision making support systems: achievements, challenges and opportunities

  2002cited by this paper
• Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS

  2001cited by this paper
• Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

  2001influential reference
• Evaluation of a decision support system for credit management decisions

  2001cited by this paper
• Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier

  2000cited by this paper
• Toward a design theory of problem solving

  2000cited by this paper
• A study of how individuals solve complex and ill-structured problems

  1999cited by this paper
• Nondestructive Evaluation

  1998cited by this paper
• Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams

  1996cited by this paper
• Implicit learning in the control of complex systems

  1995influential reference
• Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving

  1995cited by this paper
• Spatial decision support systems: An overview of technology and a test of efficacy

  1995cited by this paper
• Thinking and deciding, 2nd ed.

  1994cited by this paper
• Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioral decision research.

  1994cited by this paper
• Assessing the Accuracy of Decisions

  1993cited by this paper
• Evaluating decision support and expert systems

  1991cited by this paper
• Solving complex problems: Exploration and control of complex systems

  1991cited by this paper
• Spatial decision support systems

  1991cited by this paper
• How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process

  1990cited by this paper
• Database organization strategies for spatial decision support systems

  1990cited by this paper
• Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making

  1989cited by this paper
• Either a medal or a corporal: the effects of success and failure on the evaluation of decision making and decision makers

  1989influential reference
• The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision‐making

  1989cited by this paper
• Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical test

  1988cited by this paper
• The economic evaluation of implementing a GIS

  1988influential reference
• Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making.

  1988cited by this paper
• Decision analysis: practice and promise

  1988influential reference
• Rational choice in an uncertain world

  1988cited by this paper
• DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR ILL‐STRUCTURED PROBLEMS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

  1987cited by this paper
• AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPUTER‐ASSISTED DECISION ANALYSIS*

  1986cited by this paper
• The evaluation of managerial decisions' quality by managers

  1984cited by this paper
• WHAT CONSTITUTES A GOOD DECISION

  1984cited by this paper
• Planning for strategic decision support systems

  1983cited by this paper
• Structuring decision problems for decision analysis

  1980cited by this paper
• Evaluating management information systems through optimal control theory

  1979cited by this paper
• Decision support systems : an organizational perspective

  1978cited by this paper
• Information Load and Decision Quality: Some Contested Issues

  1977cited by this paper
• Method and Appraisal in Economics: From substantive to procedural rationality

  1976cited by this paper
• Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.

  1975cited by this paper
• The Structure of Ill Structured Problems

  1973cited by this paper
• Computer Augmented Organizational Problem Solving

  1970cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.