Agreeing the content of a patient‐reported outcome measure for primary care: a Delphi consensus study

As the first contact for any health‐related need, primary care clinicians often address multiple patient problems, with a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) which covers this range of outcomes. Therefore, many research studies into primary care services use PROMs that do not capture the full impact of these services.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Health Expectations

• Publication date

  2016-04-28

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/hex.12462PMID 27123987PMCID 5354062
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Health Measurement Scales A Practical Guide To Their Development And Use

  2016cited by this paper
• Development and validation of a question prompt list for parents of children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a Delphi study

  2016cited by this paper
• Patient and practitioners’ views on the most important outcomes arising from primary care consultations: a qualitative study

  2015cited by this paper
• Core information set for oesophageal cancer surgery

  2015cited by this paper
• Can the outcome of primary care be measured by a Patient Reported Outcome Measure?

  2014cited by this paper
• Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention to support the management of long-term conditions: study protocol for two linked randomized controlled trials

  2014cited by this paper
• Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis.

  2014cited by this paper
• The content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study based on video recordings.

  2013cited by this paper
• Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare

  2013cited by this paper
• Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure

  2013cited by this paper
• Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial

  2013cited by this paper
• Improvements in Health Behaviors and Health Status Among Newly Insured Members of an Innovative Health Access Plan

  2013cited by this paper
• Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

  2013cited by this paper
• Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.

  2012cited by this paper
• University of Birmingham Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A.

  2012cited by this paper
• How the Affordable Care Act Will Strengthen the Nation's Primary Care Foundation

  2011cited by this paper
• Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A

  2011cited by this paper
• Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.

  2011cited by this paper
• Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

  2011cited by this paper
• Measuring the outcomes of long-term care.

  2011cited by this paper
• ASCOT Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit: Main Guidance v2.1PSSRU Discussion Paper 2716/3, University of Kent

  2011cited by this paper
• Asking questions: the effect of a brief intervention in community health centers on patient activation.

  2011cited by this paper
• Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use

  2010cited by this paper
• Do walk-in centres for commuters work? A mixed methods evaluation.

  2009cited by this paper
• Quality in primary health care: a multidimensional approach to complexity

  2009cited by this paper
• Health measurement scales

  2008cited by this paper
• Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four‐arm Delphi study

  2008cited by this paper
• Does Advanced Access improve access to primary health care? Questionnaire survey of patients.

  2007cited by this paper
• Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch modeling, Parallel analysis, and TETRAD

  2007cited by this paper
• The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus

  2007cited by this paper
• Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe.

  2005cited by this paper
• Prevalence of Multimorbidity Among Adults Seen in Family Practice

  2005cited by this paper
• Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure.

  2005cited by this paper
• How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?

  2004cited by this paper
• What Is the Quality of Quality of Medical Care Measures?: Rashomon -like Relativism and Real-World Applications

  2003cited by this paper
• The Delphi technique: myths and realities.

  2003cited by this paper
• Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries?

  2003cited by this paper
• Building Consensus Using the Policy Delphi Method

  2000cited by this paper
• Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care

  2000cited by this paper
• The emperor's quality clothes: for goodness' sake, let's take the strain off the word quality!

  2000cited by this paper
• Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey

  1999cited by this paper
• Quality indicators for general practice: which ones can general practitioners and health authority managers agree are important and how useful are they?

  1998cited by this paper
• Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

  1998cited by this paper
• A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations.

  1998cited by this paper
• Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey

  1996cited by this paper
• EuroQol: the current state of play.

  1996cited by this paper
• About the authors

  1995cited by this paper
• The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs

  1993cited by this paper
• Measuring health — A review of quality of life measurement scales

  1993cited by this paper
• Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales: by Ann Bowling

  1992cited by this paper
• Scale Development: Theory and Applications.

  1992cited by this paper
• The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection

  1992cited by this paper
• The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

  1992cited by this paper
• The Duke Health Profile: A 17-ltem Measure of Health and Dysfunction

  1990cited by this paper
• The quality of care: how can it be assessed?

  1989cited by this paper
• The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

  1988cited by this paper
• An experimental study of group opinion

  1969cited by this paper
• Constitution of the World Health Organization.

  1946cited by this paper

• Assessing Older Adults' Adherence to Appropriate Polypharmacy: Selection of Outcome Measures for Intervention Trials

  2026cites this paper
• Developing core indicators for identifying people at risk of delayed heart failure diagnosis

  2025cites this paper
• Measure selection for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for CAR T-cell therapy patients: a modified Delphi consensus study

  2025cites this paper
• Revisiting the Delphi technique - Research thinking and practice: A discussion paper.

  2025cites this paper
• Protocol for a mixed-methods study to develop and feasibility test a digital system for the capture of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (the PRO-CAR-T study)

  2024cites this paper
• Academic pharmacist competencies in ordinary and emergency situations: content validation and pilot description in Lebanese academia

  2023cites this paper
• Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of digital health literacy for chronic patients: results of a French international online Delphi study

  2023cites this paper
• Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children’s research involvement group and expert item generation

  2023cites this paper
• The Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Recessive Ataxias: The Person-Reported Ataxia Impact Scale

  2023cites this paper
• Developing a core risk factors set for assessment of breast cancer risk in Iranian females: A qualitative Delphi consensus.

  2022cites this paper
• Establishing the content validity of a new emergency department patient-reported experience measure (ED PREM): a Delphi study

  2022cites this paper
• Developing a core outcome set for patient-reported symptom monitoring to reduce hospital admissions for patients with heart failure.

  2022cites this paper
• Primary care physician’s (PCP) perceived value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: a mixed methods study

  2021cites this paper
• Evaluating the content of a patient-reported outcome measure for people with multimorbidity: a Delphi consensus

  2021cites this paper
• Expert consensus on information sheet proposals for patients under treatment with lithium

  2021cites this paper
• Expert consensus on information sheet proposals for patients under treatment with lithium.

  2019cites this paper
• General practitioners’ views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study

  2019cites this paper
• Qualitative assessment of the primary care outcomes questionnaire: a cognitive interview study

  2018cites this paper
• Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument

  2018cites this paper
• The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study

  2018cites this paper
• Neurocognitive disorders: what are the prioritized caregiver needs? A consensus obtained by the Delphi method

  2018cites this paper
• Patient understanding of two commonly used patient reported outcome measures for primary care: a cognitive interview study

  2018cites this paper
• Psychometric Testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire

  2017cites this paper