Relevance Judgments for Image Retrieval Evaluation

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  ImageCLEF

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-15181-1_4
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• How reliable are annotations via crowdsourcing: a study about inter-annotator agreement for multi-label image annotation

  2010cited by this paper
• Overview of the WikipediaMM Task at ImageCLEF 2009

  2009cited by this paper
• The ImageCLEFmed Medical Image Retrieval Task Test Collection

  2009cited by this paper
• Overview of the CLEF 2009 Medical Image Retrieval Track

  2009cited by this paper
• Retrieval sensitivity under training using different measures

  2008cited by this paper
• LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation

  2008cited by this paper
• Bias and the limits of pooling

  2006cited by this paper
• Model Formulation: Advancing Biomedical Image Retrieval: Development and Analysis of a Test Collection

  2006cited by this paper
• Estimating average precision with incomplete and imperfect judgments

  2006cited by this paper
• Enhancing access to the Bibliome: the TREC 2004 Genomics Track

  2006cited by this paper
• DIRECT: A System for Evaluating Information Access Components of Digital Libraries

  2005cited by this paper
• Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information

  2004cited by this paper
• The CLEF Cross Language Image Retrieval Track (ImageCLEF) 2004

  2004cited by this paper
• Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques

  2002cited by this paper
• The Philosophy of Information Retrieval Evaluation

  2001influential reference
• Do batch and user evaluations give the same results?

  2000cited by this paper
• Efficient construction of large test collections

  1998cited by this paper
• Overview of the Seventh Text REtrieval Conference

  1998cited by this paper
• How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments?

  1998influential reference
• OHSUMED: an interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research

  1994cited by this paper
• The significance of the Cranfield tests on index languages

  1991cited by this paper
• Report on the need for and provision of an 'ideal' information retrieval test collection

  1975cited by this paper
• Aslib Cranfield research project: report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems

  1962cited by this paper

• A Comparative Study of Similarity Measures for Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval

  2012cites this paper