Maturation of effect size during enrollment of prospective randomized trials.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Journal of Surgical Research

• Publication date

  2018-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.082PMID 29433883
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Terminated Trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database: Evaluation of Availability of Primary Outcome Data and Reasons for Termination

  2015cited by this paper
• Saline vs Tissue Plasminogen Activator Irrigations after Drain Placement for Appendicitis-Associated Abscess: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

  2015cited by this paper
• Sample size calculations in pediatric clinical trials conducted in an ICU: a systematic review

  2014cited by this paper
• Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

  2013cited by this paper
• Topical silver sulfadiazine vs collagenase ointment for the treatment of partial thickness burns in children: a prospective randomized trial.

  2012cited by this paper
• Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough.

  2012cited by this paper
• Epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain after pectus excavatum repair: a prospective, randomized trial.

  2012cited by this paper
• Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial

  2012cited by this paper
• Minimal vs extensive esophageal mobilization during laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective randomized trial.

  2011cited by this paper
• Single Incision Versus Standard 3-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives

  2010cited by this paper
• A complete course of intravenous antibiotics vs a combination of intravenous and oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective, randomized trial.

  2010cited by this paper
• Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.

  2010cited by this paper
• Thoracoscopic decortication vs tube thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children: a prospective, randomized trial.

  2009cited by this paper
• Barriers encountered during enrollment in an internet-mediated randomized controlled trial

  2009cited by this paper
• Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial.

  2008cited by this paper
• Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric Stenosis: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

  2006cited by this paper
• Reliability, effect size, and responsiveness of health status measures in the design of randomized and cluster-randomized trials.

  2004cited by this paper
• For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from Elsevier Ltd. Components of Sample Size Calculations Epidemiology 1 Sample Size Calculations in Randomised Trials: Mandatory and Mystical

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Evolving a national clinical trials learning health system

  2022cites this paper
• Ethics of randomized trials in pediatric surgery

  2020cites this paper
• Estimating the rate and reasons of clinical trial failure in urologic oncology.

  2020cites this paper