Practices in forensic neuropsychology: perspectives of neuropsychologists and trial attorneys.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1999

• Venue

  Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

• Publication date

  1999-11-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00065-7PMID 14590178
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

  2002cited by this paper
• The use of neuropsychology test technicians in clinical practice: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Approved 5/15/99.

  2000influential reference
• Presence of third party observers during neuropsychological testing: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Approved 5/15/99.

  2000cited by this paper
• Presence of Third Party Observers During Neuropsychological Testing Official Statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology

  2000influential reference
• NAN membership survey on third party observers during neuropsychological testing

  1999cited by this paper
• Ethical Issues Related to the Presence of Third Party Observers in Clinical Neuropsychological Evaluations

  1998cited by this paper
• Regarding ethics in forensic neuropsychological consultation: A comment on guilmette and hagan

  1997influential reference
• Ethical considerations in forensic neuropsychological consultation.

  1997cited by this paper
• Attorneys Influence Expert Evidence in Forensic Psychological and Neuropsychological Cases

  1997influential reference
• Comment on ethical considerations in forensic neuropsychological consultation

  1997cited by this paper
• Potential sources of bias in forensic neuropsychological evaluations

  1997influential reference
• Forensic neuropsychological test usage: An empirical survey

  1996cited by this paper
• Five-year follow-up survey of practices and beliefs of clinical neuropsychologists

  1996cited by this paper
• Presence of third parties during neuropsychological evaluations: Who is evaluating whom?

  1996cited by this paper
• PROVIDING INFORMATION TO CLIENTS ABOUT PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS : A SURVEY OF ATTORNEYS' AND LAW STUDENTS' ATTITUDES

  1995cited by this paper
• Confirmed Attorney Coaching Prior to Neuropsychological Evaluation

  1995cited by this paper
• The Aleutian Enterprise sinking and posttraumatic stress disorder: Misdiagnosis in clinical and forensic settings.

  1995cited by this paper
• Psychological report standards in neuropsychology

  1995cited by this paper
• On the practice of routinely appending neuropsychological data to reports

  1995cited by this paper
• Observer Effects on Neuropsychological Performance: A Case Report

  1995cited by this paper
• The Ethics Code and neuropsychological assessment practices.

  1995cited by this paper
• Ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices.

  1995cited by this paper
• The second TCN salary survey: A survey of neuropsychologists part I

  1994cited by this paper
• Proposed standard of professional practice: Neuropsychological reports display all quantitative data.

  1993cited by this paper
• Neuropsychologists as expert witnesses: Issues of admissibility

  1992cited by this paper
• A survey of practices and beliefs among ABPP and Non-ABPP clinical neuropsychologists

  1990cited by this paper
• A national survey of psychologists who offer neuropsychological services.

  1990cited by this paper
• The TCN professional practice survey: Part I: General practices of neuropsychologists in primary employment and private practice settings

  1990influential reference
• The TCN salary survey: A salary survey of neuropsychologists

  1989cited by this paper
• Limitations on neuropsychological testimony by the florida appellate decisions: Action, reaction, and counteraction

  1987cited by this paper
• Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony, 3rd ed., Vol. I; Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony, 3rd ed., Vol. II; Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 347, June 20, 1980

  1983cited by this paper

• IOPC survey of test security practices and perspectives of licensed psychologists.

  2025cites this paper
• The Memory Integrated Language Test (MIL Test): Initial Validation of a Novel Web-Based Performance Validity Test

  2024cites this paper
• Attorney demands for protected psychological test information: Is access necessary for cross examination or does it lead to misinformation? An interorganizational* position paper

  2024cites this paper
• Release of Protected Test Information Under Protective Order: Viable Solution or Illusory Safeguard? An Interorganizational† Position Paper.

  2024cites this paper
• Threats to the integrity of psychological assessment: The misuse of test raw data and materials

  2023cites this paper
• Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on test security

  2022cites this paper
• Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29

  2022cites this paper
• Preliminary validation of the computerized N-Tri - A Tri-Choice naming and response bias test

  2022cites this paper
• Aminoglycoside-induced lipotoxicity and its reversal in kidney on chip.

  2022cites this paper
• Time and money: Exploring enhancements to performance validity research designs

  2021cites this paper
• Mechanism and reversal of drug-induced nephrotoxicity on a chip

  2021cites this paper
• Utility of the Rey 15-Item Test for Detecting Memory Malingering

  2021cites this paper
• The Eyes Never Lie: Detecting Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury With Eye-Tracking

  2020cites this paper
• Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide “evidence” for “good effort"

  2020cites this paper
• Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury: Combining response time with performance validity test accuracy

  2019cites this paper
• What types of recommendations are we giving patients? A survey of clinical neuropsychologists

  2019cites this paper
• Symptom validity in clinical assessments

  2018cites this paper
• Zur Leistungsvalidierung neuropsychologischer Testergebnisse – eine Übersicht

  2018cites this paper
• Recommendations for Driving After Neuropsychological Assessment: A Survey of Neuropsychologists

  2018cites this paper
• Dissimulation strategies on standard neuropsychological tests: A qualitative investigation

  2017cites this paper
• Detection Of Malingering In Bona Fide Traumatic Brain Injury And Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury: Combining Response Time With Pvt Accuracy Results

  2016cites this paper
• Policy Statement of the American Board of Professional Neuropsychology regarding Third Party Observation and the recording of psychological test administration in neuropsychological evaluations

  2016cites this paper
• The Impact of Coaching on Faking-Good/Under-Reporting on the PAI

  2016cites this paper
• Forensic neuropsychological assessment: a review of its scope

  2015cites this paper
• Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Negative Response Bias: The Temporal Memory Sequence Test

  2015cites this paper
• Using a supportive second interviewer to elicit cues to deceit

  2015cites this paper
• Eye-movement-based detection of relational memory despite attempts to simulate memory impairment

  2014cites this paper
• guide for clinicians Evaluating malingering in cognitive and memory examinations: a

  2014cites this paper
• The guilty adjustment: Response trends on the symptom validity test

  2014cites this paper
• Evaluating malingering in cognitive and memory examinations: a guide for clinicians

  2014cites this paper
• Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: a survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries.

  2013cites this paper
• Dissimulation strategies on neuropsychological tests: A qualitative investigation

  2013cites this paper
• Compensation neurosis: a too quickly forgotten concept?

  2012cites this paper
• Use of the Multiple Errands Test – Simplified Version in the assessment of suboptimal effort

  2012cites this paper
• Detecting Suboptimal Cognitive Effort: Classification Accuracy of the Conner's Continuous Performance Test-II, Brief Test of Attention, and Trail Making Test

  2012cites this paper
• Noncredible Performance in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

  2012cites this paper
• [Symptom validation: an overview].

  2012cites this paper
• Beschwerdenvalidierung: Ein aktueller Überblick

  2012cites this paper
• Detecting Response Bias on the MindStreams Battery

  2012cites this paper
• The relationship between scores on the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status and the test of memory malingering

  2011cites this paper
• Assessment Of Memory Function And Effort Using The Wechsler Memory Scale - 4th Edition

  2010cites this paper
• AN EXAMINATION OF TASK AND RESPONSE INFLUENCES ON EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) CORRELATES OF RECOLLECTION AND FAMILIARITY

  2010cites this paper
• Posttraumatic stress disorder can easily be faked, but faking can be detected in most cases.

  2010cites this paper
• Maar niet heus

  2010cites this paper
• La simulación de disfunción neurocognitiva en el campo de la neuropsicología forense. Aproximaciones teóricas

  2009cites this paper
• Traumatic Brain Injury and Forensic Neuropsychology

  2009cites this paper
• Protecting Raw Data and Psychological Tests from Wrongful Disclosure: A Primer on the Law and Other Persuasive Strategies

  2009cites this paper
• The Vulnerability to Coaching across Measures of Effort

  2009cites this paper
• Test security in medicolegal cases: proposed guidelines for attorneys utilizing neuropsychology practice.

  2009cites this paper
• The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment

  2008cites this paper
• Effects of a third party observer and anxiety on tests of executive function.

  2008cites this paper
• Symptom Validity Testing for the detection of simulated amnesia: Not robust to coaching

  2008cites this paper
• Memory for Complex Pictures: Development and Validation of Digit Test of Effort

  2007cites this paper
• [A review of methods for the assessment of symptom validity: an update 2002 to 2005].

  2007cites this paper
• The vulnerability to coaching across measures of malingering

  2007influential citation
• Malingering: Traumatic Brain Injury

  2007cites this paper
• Probable Malingering and Performance on the Continuous Visual Memory Test

  2007cites this paper
• Malingering: Overview and Basic Concepts

  2007cites this paper
• Symptom Information—Warning—Coaching

  2006cites this paper
• Comparison of various RAVLT scores in the detection of noncredible memory performance.

  2005cites this paper
• PROBABLE MALINGERING AND PERFORMANCE ON THE TEST OF VARIABLES OF ATTENTION

  2005cites this paper
• Forensische Neuropsychologie - Aufgaben, Anwendungsfelder und Methoden

  2005cites this paper
• The influence of instruction set and test format on the detection of malingering

  2005cites this paper
• Malingering Indexes for the Halstead Category Test

  2004cites this paper
• Methodological Problems in the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effects of Exposure to Welding Fumes and Manganese

  2004cites this paper
• Release of Test Data Under the 2002 Ethics Code and the HIPAA Privacy Rule: A Raw Deal or Just a Half-Baked Idea?

  2004cites this paper
• Relationships Between Eight Measures of Suspect Effort

  2003cites this paper
• Neuropsychological Profiling of Symptom Exaggeration and Malingering

  2003cites this paper
• The reliability of production strategy scores for the Ruff Figural Fluency Test.

  2003cites this paper
• Specificity of Malingering Detection Strategies in Older Adults Using the CVLT and WCST

  2003cites this paper
• The Portland Digit Recognition Test: A review of validation data and clinical use

  2003cites this paper
• Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exeggeration

  2002cites this paper
• Referring Physicians' Perceptions of the Neuropsychological Evaluation: How are we Doing?

  2002cites this paper
• Portland Digit Recognition Test the Test of Memory Malingering and standard neuropsychological measures: Comparing efficacy the effects of coaching and face validity

  2002cites this paper
• Assessment of Feigned Neurocognitive Impairment in Retired Athletes in a Monetarily Incentivized Forensic Setting

  year unknowncites this paper