Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Thrombosis and Haemostasis

• Publication date

  2007-01-06

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1160/TH06-03-0181PMID 17264962
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2006cited by this paper
• Guidelines for implementation of patient self-testing and patient self-management of oral anticoagulation. International consensus guidelines prepared by International Self-Monitoring Association for Oral Anticoagulation.

  2005cited by this paper
• Poor agreement among prothrombin time international normalized ratio methods: comparison of seven commercial reagents.

  2005cited by this paper
• Short-term venous stasis influences routine coagulation testing

  2005cited by this paper
• Importance of device evaluation for point-of-care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs.

  2005cited by this paper
• Agreement of a new whole-blood PT/INR test using capillary samples with plasma INR determinations.

  2005cited by this paper
• Systematic review of studies of self-management of oral anticoagulation

  2004cited by this paper
• INR comparison between the CoaguChek Pro PT(N) and a standard laboratory method.

  2004cited by this paper
• Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the near-patient testing CoaguChek S international normalised ratio monitor in rural medical practice.

  2004cited by this paper
• Accuracy, Precision, and Quality Control for Point-of-Care Testing of Oral Anticoagulation

  2001cited by this paper
• Clinical outcome of self-management of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation or deep vein thrombosis.

  2000cited by this paper
• A Prospective Controlled Trial Comparing Weekly Self-testing and Self-dosing with the Standard Management of Patients on Stable Oral Anticoagulation

  2000cited by this paper
• [Optimizing long-term anticoagulation by patient self-management?].

  1998cited by this paper
• Self management of oral anticoagulant therapy after heart valve replacement.

  1997cited by this paper
• Biological variation of International Normalized Ratio for prothrombin times, and consequences in monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy: computer simulation of serial measurements with goal-setting for analytical quality.

  1997cited by this paper
• Two Recombinant Tissue Factor Reagents Compared to Conventional Thromboplastins for Determination of International Normalised Ratio: A Thirty-three-laboratory Collaborative Study

  1996cited by this paper
• Multicenter evaluation of a new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring system

  1995cited by this paper
• Multicentric Evaluation of a New PT Reagent Based on Recombinant Human Tissue Factor and Synthetic Phospholipids

  1994cited by this paper
• Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

  1986cited by this paper
• A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I

  1983cited by this paper

• CoaguChek® XS versus standard laboratory prothrombin time for anticoagulant monitoring in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

  2022cites this paper
• Performance of the microINR Point-of-Care System Used by Self-Testing Patients: A Multicenter Clinical Trial

  2021cites this paper
• Performance evaluation of coaguchek pro II in comparison with coaguchek XS plus and sta‐r Max using a sta‐neoplastine CI plus

  2021cites this paper
• Benefit of Self-Managed Anticoagulation in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device

  2020cites this paper
• Evaluation of the Accuracy of the LumiraDx INR Test Using Patients in Receipt of Phenprocoumon Anticoagulation Therapy

  2020cites this paper
• (2017). An evaluation of a coagulation system (Xprecia Stride) for utilisation in anticoagulation management. Clinical

  2018cites this paper
• Effects of home prothrombin international ratio (PT-INR) management in children with mechanical prosthetic valves - Importance of individual correlations between laboratory and CoaguChek device PT-INRs.

  2018cites this paper
• Assessment of whole blood coagulation with a microfluidic dielectric sensor

  2018cites this paper
• An evaluation of a coagulation system (Xprecia Stride) for utilisation in anticoagulation management

  2017cites this paper
• Clinical evaluation of whole blood prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) using a Laser Speckle Rheology sensor

  2017cites this paper
• Accuracy of point of care coagulometers compared to reference laboratory measurements in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.

  2016cites this paper
• Point-of-care testing and INR within-subject variation in patients receiving a constant dose of vitamin K antagonist

  2015cites this paper
• The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care tests (CoaguChek system, INRatio2 PT/INR monitor and ProTime Microcoagulation system) for the self-monitoring of the coagulation status of people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy, compared with standard UK practice: s

  2015cites this paper
• Preparation of control blood for external quality assessment of point-of-care international normalized ratio testing in the Netherlands.

  2014cites this paper
• Patient self‐testing and self‐management of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists: guidance from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology

  2014cites this paper
• I-STAT, COAGUCHEK XS PLUS, AND HEMOCHRON VERSUS REFERENCE LABORATORY INRS: PHARMACIST-MANAGED CLINICS

  2014cites this paper
• [Evaluation of an educational program for oral anticoagulation in children with the INR home-monitoring CoaguChek XS(®)].

  2013cites this paper
• Comparison of point-of-care analysis using Coaguchek XS and standard laboratory-measured prothrombin time in dogs

  2013cites this paper
• The Unique Challenges of Hemostatic Testing in Children

  2013cites this paper
• Accuracy of the point‐of‐care coagulometer CoaguChek XS in the hands of patients

  2013cites this paper
• [Evaluation of an educational program for oral anticoagulation in children with the INR home-monitoring CoaguChek XS(®)].

  2013cites this paper
• Precision and accuracy of point‐of‐care testing coagulometers used for self‐testing and self‐management of oral anticoagulation therapy

  2012cites this paper
• Point-of-care INR coagulometers for self-management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update.

  2012cites this paper
• Point-of-care monitoring of vitamin K-antagonists: validation of CoaguChek XS test strips with International Standard thromboplastin

  2012cites this paper
• Telemedicine improves the monitoring process in anticoagulant treatment

  2012cites this paper
• Self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy--methodological and clinical aspects.

  2011influential citation
• Comparison of point‐of‐care testing (POCT): i‐STAT® international normalized ratio (INR) vs reference laboratory INR in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery

  2011cites this paper
• Home Management of Oral Anticoagulation via Telemedicine Versus Conventional Hospital-Based Treatment

  2011cites this paper
• Self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy in children

  2011cites this paper
• External quality assessment (EQA) for CoaguChek monitors

  2010influential citation
• Stability of CoaguChek XS test strip is not effected by frequency of air exposure

  2010influential citation
• Patient self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation

  2009cites this paper
• Comparative study of accuracy and clinical agreement of the CoaguChek XS portable device versus standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients

  2009cites this paper
• Clinical Utility and Accuracy of Coaguchek® XS, a Reliable Alternative to Laboratory International Normalized Ratio Monitoring in Korean Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

  2009cites this paper
• Precision and accuracy of CoaguChek S and XS monitors: The need for external quality assessment

  2009cites this paper
• Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.

  2009cites this paper
• Thrombin generation and coagulation factor activities: evaluation and comparison with the international normalized ratio

  2009cites this paper
• International normalised ratio (INR) measured on the CoaguChek S and XS compared with the laboratory for determination of precision and accuracy

  2009cites this paper
• Validation of the international normalized ratio (INR) in a new point‐of‐care system designed for home monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy

  2009cites this paper
• Laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation: where do we stand?

  2009cites this paper
• Assessment of International Normalized Ratio Using CoaguChek XS and CoaguChek S as Compared With Central Laboratory Testing

  2009cites this paper
• Aktualisierte Leitlinie „Gerinnungsselbstmanagement”

  2009cites this paper
• Laboratory Monitoring of Anticoagulation: Where Do We Stand?

  2009cites this paper
• Influence of haematocrit on international normalised ratio (INR) differences between a whole blood point-of-care coagulation monitor and reference prothrombin time in plasma

  2008cites this paper
• Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin

  2008cites this paper
• A randomized trial comparing INR monitoring devices in patients with anticoagulation self-management: evaluation of a novel error-grid approach

  2008cites this paper
• Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.

  2008cites this paper
• Utility of CoaguChek XS for Monitoring the Prothrombin Time

  2008cites this paper
• Performance evaluation of a new small-volume coagulation monitor: the SmartCheck INR system.

  2008cites this paper
• Evaluation of the Roche CoaguChek XS handheld coagulation analyzer in a cardiac outpatient clinic.

  2008cites this paper
• Feasibility, cost-effectiveness and patients’ acceptance of point-of-care INR testing in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic

  2008cites this paper
• Neue Aspekte des INR-Selbstmonitorings

  2008cites this paper
• ProTime self-management yielding improvement of fluency and quality of life

  2007cites this paper
• Evaluation of the CoaguChek XS Plus system in a Swiss community setting

  2007cites this paper