Emergency managers who work on floods and other weather-related hazards constitute critical frontline responders to disasters. Yet, while these professionals operate in a realm rife with uncertainty related to forecasts and other unknowns, the influence of uncertainty on their decision-making is poorly understood. Consequently, a national-level survey of county emergency managers in the United States was administered to examine how they interpret forecast information, using hypothetical climate, flood, and weather scenarios to simulate their responses to uncertain information. The study revealed that even emergency managers with substantial experience take decision shortcuts and make biased choices, just as do members of the general population. Their choices vary depending on such features as the format in which probabilistic forecasts are presented and whether outcomes are represented as gains or losses. In sum, forecast producers who consider these decision processes when developing and communicating forecasts could help to improve flood preparation and potentially reduce disaster losses.
How emergency managers (mis?)interpret forecasts.
K. Wernstedt,P. Roberts,J. Arvai,K. Redmond
Published 2018 in Disasters. The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
Disasters. The Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management
- Publication date
2018-06-12
- Fields of study
Political Science, Medicine, Business, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-73 of 73 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-33 of 33 citing papers · Page 1 of 1