Differences and similarities in European railway disruption management practices

D. Schipper,Lasse Gerrits

Published 2018 in Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management

ABSTRACT

textabstractDisruptions severely undermine the reliability of railway systems. Consequently, a lot of investments are made to improve disruption management. Much has already been written about disruption management, often with the purpose of supporting operators in their decision making. However, to the best of our knowledge, this literature doesn't consider the structural differences of disruption management in different countries. An overview of the various ways in which disruptions are solved and conditions under which that happens could help rail infrastructure managers and train operating companies to reconsider the ways in which they operate. This paper takes stock of the similarities and differences in how disruptions are managed in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. Of importance is not only how these systems work on paper, but above all what happens in practice, i.e. the habits and routines that operators have developed for solving disruptions.

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Venue

    Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management

  • Publication date

    2018-01-04

  • Fields of study

    Business, Engineering, Computer Science

  • Identifiers
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-38 of 38 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-30 of 30 citing papers · Page 1 of 1