Large marine protected areas (LMPAs) are increasingly being established and have a high profile in marine conservation. LMPAs are expected to achieve multiple objectives, and because of their size are postulated to avoid trade-offs that are common in smaller MPAs. However, evaluations across multiple outcomes are lacking. We used a systematic approach to code several social and ecological outcomes of 12 LMPAs. We found evidence of three types of trade-offs: trade-offs between different ecological resources (supply trade-offs); trade-offs between ecological resource conditions and the well-being of resource users (supply-demand trade-offs); and trade-offs between the well-being outcomes of different resource users (demand trade-offs). We also found several divergent outcomes that were attributed to influences beyond the scope of the LMPA. We suggest that despite their size, trade-offs can develop in LMPAs and should be considered in planning and design. LMPAs may improve their performance across multiple social and ecological objectives if integrated with larger-scale conservation efforts.
Assessing trade-offs in large marine protected areas
T. Davies,G. Epstein,Stacy E. Aguilera,C. Brooks,Michael E. Cox,L. Evans,S. Maxwell,M. Nenadović,Natalie Ban
Published 2018 in PLoS ONE
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2018
- Venue
PLoS ONE
- Publication date
2018-04-18
- Fields of study
Medicine, Business, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-70 of 70 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-39 of 39 citing papers · Page 1 of 1