The existing factoid QA systems often lack a post-inspection component that can help models recover from their own mistakes. In this work, we propose to crosscheck the corresponding KB relations behind the predicted answers and identify potential inconsistencies. Instead of developing a new model that accepts evidences collected from these relations, we choose to plug them back to the original questions directly and check if the revised question makes sense or not. A bidirectional LSTM is applied to encode revised questions. We develop a scoring mechanism over the revised question encodings to refine the predictions of a base QA system. This approach can improve the F1 score of STAGG (Yih et al., 2015), one of the leading QA systems, from 52.5% to 53.9% on WEBQUESTIONS data.
Recovering Question Answering Errors via Query Revision
Semih Yavuz,Izzeddin Gur,Yu Su,Xifeng Yan
Published 2017 in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2017
- Venue
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
- Publication date
2017-09-01
- Fields of study
Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-43 of 43 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-8 of 8 citing papers · Page 1 of 1