Caveats for the spatial arrangement method: Comment on Hout, Goldinger, and Ferguson (2013).

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Journal of experimental psychology. General

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/a0039758PMID 26881991
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Invalid assumptions in clustering analyses of category fluency data: Reply to Sung, Gordon and Schretlen (2015).

  2016cited by this paper
• The Role of Semantic Clustering in Optimal Memory Foraging

  2015cited by this paper
• Non-Bayesian Noun Generalization in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children: Probing the Role of Prior Knowledge in the Suspicious Coincidence Effect

  2015cited by this paper
• The Perception of Naturalness Correlates with Low-Level Visual Features of Environmental Scenes

  2014cited by this paper
• Visual similarity is stronger than semantic similarity in guiding visual search for numbers

  2014cited by this paper
• Problems of reliability and validity with similarity derived from category fluency.

  2014cited by this paper
• MM-MDS: A Multidimensional Scaling Database with Similarity Ratings for 240 Object Categories from the Massive Memory Picture Database

  2014influential reference
• Deriving semantic structure from category fluency: clustering techniques and their pitfalls.

  2014cited by this paper
• Revealing human inductive biases for category learning by simulating cultural transmission

  2014cited by this paper
• Journal of Experimental Psychology : General The Versatility of SpAM : A Fast , Efficient , Spatial Method of Data Collection for Multidimensional Scaling

  2012influential reference
• A visual object stimulus database with standardized similarity information

  2012cited by this paper
• Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements

  2012cited by this paper
• Comparison of Methods for Collecting and Modeling Dissimilarity Data: Applications to Complex Sound Stimuli

  2011cited by this paper
• Similar but not the same: A comparison of the utility of directly rated and feature-based similarity measures for generating spatial models of conceptual data

  2009cited by this paper
• The discovery of structural form

  2008cited by this paper
• Determining the dimensionality in spatial representations of semantic concepts

  2007cited by this paper
• 11 Applications of Multidimensional Scaling in Psychometrics

  2006cited by this paper
• Using multidimensional scaling for the analysis of sexual offence behaviour: A replication and some cautionary notes

  2006cited by this paper
• Information content versus relational knowledge: semantic deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

  2006cited by this paper
• Organization of semantic category exemplars in schizophrenia.

  2005cited by this paper
• Applications of Multidimensional Scaling in Psychometrics

  2005cited by this paper
• Avoiding the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling

  2003cited by this paper
• Too Many Questions? The Uses of Incomplete Cyclic Designs for Paired Comparisons

  2003influential reference
• Determining the Dimensionality of Multidimensional Scaling Representations for Cognitive Modeling.

  2001cited by this paper
• Well-organized conceptual domains in Alzheimer's disease

  1999cited by this paper
• Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications

  1999cited by this paper
• Distance Representations of Consumer Perceptions: Evaluating Appropriateness by Using Diagnostics

  1998cited by this paper
• Analysis of similarity data and Tversky's contrast model

  1995cited by this paper
• Nearest neighbor analysis in one dimension

  1995cited by this paper
• On the Dangers of Averaging Across Subjects When Using Multidimensional Scaling or the Similarity-Choice Model

  1994cited by this paper
• An efficient method for obtaining similarity data

  1994cited by this paper
• Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification

  1991cited by this paper
• The Robustness of MDS Configurations in the Case of Incomplete Data

  1988cited by this paper
• Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

  1986cited by this paper
• Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces.

  1986cited by this paper
• Overall similarity and the identification of separable-dimension stimuli: A choice model analysis

  1985cited by this paper
• Representations of perceptions of risks

  1984cited by this paper
• Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data

  1982cited by this paper
• Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering

  1980cited by this paper
• Recovery of structure in incomplete data by alscal

  1979cited by this paper
• Using Distance Information in the Design of Large Multidimensional Scaling Experiments

  1979cited by this paper
• Three-Way Multidimensional Scaling

  1978cited by this paper
• Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features

  1977cited by this paper
• The approximation of a group stimulus space by averaging responses to selected subsets of the stimuli

  1977cited by this paper
• Additive similarity trees

  1977cited by this paper
• A monte carlo evaluation of interactive multidimensional scaling

  1976cited by this paper
• Tables of two-associate-class partially balanced designs

  1975cited by this paper
• A note on an empirical evaluation of the isis procedure

  1975cited by this paper
• Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling

  1974cited by this paper
• Interactive scaling with individual subjects

  1972cited by this paper
• Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.

  1971cited by this paper
• Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition

  1970cited by this paper

• A tutorial review on methods for collecting similarity judgments from human observers

  2025cites this paper
• Neural representations underlying psychological responses to natural and artificial features in indoor architecture.

  2025cites this paper
• Cheaper Spaces

  2024cites this paper
• Similarity ratings for basic-level categories from the Nosofsky et al. (2018) database of rock images

  2024cites this paper
• Similarity-based reasoning in conceptual spaces

  2023cites this paper
• Plainware and Polychrome: Quantifying Perceptual Differences in Ceramic Classification Between Diverse Groups to Further a Strong Objectivity

  2020cites this paper
• The validated circular shape space: Quantifying the visual similarity of shape.

  2020cites this paper
• Q-SpAM: How to Efficiently Measure Similarity in Online Research

  2020cites this paper
• A Comparison of the Spatial Arrangement Method and the Total-Set Pairwise Rating Method for Obtaining Similarity Data in the Conceptual Domain

  2020influential citation
• Whether the Pairwise Rating Method and the Spatial Arrangement Method Yield Comparable Dimensionalities Depends on the Dimensionality Choice Procedure

  2020cites this paper
• Similarity Judgment Within and Across Categories: A Comprehensive Model Comparison

  2020cites this paper
• SOLID-Similar object and lure image database

  2019cites this paper
• The spatial arrangement method of measuring similarity can capture high-dimensional semantic structures

  2019cites this paper
• Visual interference can help and hinder memory: Capturing representational detail using the Validated Circular Shape Space

  2019cites this paper
• Simulating the Fidelity of Data for Large Stimulus Set Sizes and Variable Dimension Estimation in Multidimensional Scaling

  2018cites this paper
• Reconstruction and Visualization of Archaeological Networks

  2018cites this paper
• Toward the development of a feature-space representation for a complex natural category domain

  2017cites this paper
• SpAM is convenient but also satisfying: Reply to Verheyen et al. (2016).

  2016influential citation
• Problems of reliability and validity with similarity derived from category fluency.

  2014cites this paper