A 9-Year Analysis of Bibliographical Trends for Journals in the Subject Category of General and Internal Medicine

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  Accountability in Research

• Publication date

  2009-05-29

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/08989620902984080PMID 20183158
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000–2004

  2008cited by this paper
• Should we ditch impact factors?

  2007cited by this paper
• Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access Intra-cluster Correlation Coefficients in Adults with Diabetes in Primary Care Practices: the Vermont Diabetes Information System Field Survey

  2006cited by this paper
• The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

  2006cited by this paper
• Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.

  2006cited by this paper
• Making an impact: the rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal quality.

  2005cited by this paper
• How Citation Analysis Can Monitor the Progress of Research in Clinical Medicine

  2004cited by this paper
• Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality

  2003cited by this paper
• Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor.

  2003cited by this paper
• Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?

  2003cited by this paper
• Citation analysis: The counting house

  2002cited by this paper
• Impact factors: uses and abuses

  2002cited by this paper
• Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals.

  2002cited by this paper
• Impact factor: the numbers game.

  2002cited by this paper
• The "impact factor" in the evaluation of research.

  2002cited by this paper
• Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?

  2001cited by this paper
• Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact

  2001cited by this paper
• Journal impact factor: a brief review.

  1999cited by this paper
• Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

  1997cited by this paper
• Journal accused of manipulating impact factor

  1997cited by this paper
• Sense and nonsense about the impact factor.

  1997cited by this paper

• The mediating impact of citation scope: Evidence from China's ESI publications

  2024cites this paper
• Research development, current hotspots, and future directions of water research based on MODIS images: a critical review with a bibliometric analysis

  2017cites this paper
• Impact of Article Language in Multi-Language Medical Journals - a Bibliometric Analysis of Self-Citations and Impact Factor

  2013cites this paper
• Referees Often Miss Obvious Errors in Computer and Electronic Publications

  2013cites this paper
• Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: merits and demerits of citation analysis.

  2012cites this paper
• High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information

  2011cites this paper
• A longitudinal analysis of bibliometric and impact factor trends among the core international journals of nursing, 1977-2008.

  2010cites this paper